DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
	dev@dpdk.org, ray.kinsella@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: fix soname info for 19.11 compatiblity
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:14:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211111405.GB407@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1899696.lD3V72zqS8@xps>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:08:25PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 11/12/2019 12:04, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 10:26 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > The soname for each stable ABI version should be just the ABI version
> > > major
> > > number without the minor number. Unfortunately both major and minor
> > > were
> > > used causing version 20.1 to be incompatible with 20.0.
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes the issue by switching from 2-part to 3-part ABI
> > > version
> > > numbers so that we can keep 20.0 as soname and using the final digits
> > > to
> > > identify the 20.x releases which are ABI compatible. This requires
> > > changes
> > > to both make and meson builds to handle the three-digit version and
> > > shrink
> > > it to 2-digit for soname.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: cba806e07d6f ("build: change ABI versioning to global")
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <
> > > thomas@monjalon.net
> > > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <
> > > bruce.richardson@intel.com
> > > >
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > This patch contains an alternative fix to that implied by the
> > > previous patches:
> > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63726/
> > > 
> > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/63728/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  ABI_VERSION         | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/meson.build | 4 ++--
> > >  lib/meson.build     | 4 ++--
> > >  mk/rte.lib.mk       | 5 ++++-
> > >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> > 
> > Thank you! I've set a reminder in my calendar for September to revert
> > it :-)
> 
> I don't think we need to revert it.
> The ABI version will have only 2 numbers (21.0).
> In makefile there is no change.
> What needs to be changed in meson?
> 
We need to remove the explicit use of so_version, and let meson just do the
right thing with the lib version. That being said, I can see about having
meson behave as make so that it will work even if we forget (i.e. even with
changed behaviour we should still remove the explicit soversion usage when
it's no longer needed).

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11 10:26 Bruce Richardson
2019-12-11 11:04 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-12-11 11:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-11 11:14     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-12-11 11:19       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-12 11:07         ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-11 11:11   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-11 11:25     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-12 11:14     ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-12 13:58       ` Luca Boccassi
2019-12-12 14:05         ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-12 15:08           ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-11 11:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-11 13:14   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-11 15:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12  8:27   ` David Marchand
2019-12-12  8:57     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-12 11:44       ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12 11:59         ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12 13:41           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-12 11:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12 12:30   ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-12 13:02     ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12 15:25       ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-12 15:34         ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-12 14:45   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-12-12 16:34   ` Ray Kinsella
2019-12-13 11:38   ` Neil Horman
2019-12-16 11:21   ` Laatz, Kevin
2019-12-19 12:42   ` David Marchand
2019-12-19 15:19     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191211111405.GB407@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).