From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Hiroyuki Mikita <h.mikita89@gmail.com>,
"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: decrease refcnt when detaching
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:44:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B518CE@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1709340.0fJkCxgyM5@xps13>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:40 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hiroyuki Mikita; olivier.matz@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: decrease refcnt when detaching
>
> 2016-05-17 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > > > The rte_pktmbuf_detach() function should decrease refcnt on a direct
> > > > buffer.
> > >
> > > As you have noticed, "whenever the indirect buffer is detached,
> > > the reference counter on the direct buffer is decremented."
> > > So the current behaviour of rte_pktmbuf_detach() is buggy.
> > > Why not fix it without renaming?
> > > If you consider this behavioral bug is part of the API, we
> > > can fix it in a new function unattach and deprecate detach.
> > > But Konstantin, why do you want to keep a restore function?
> > > What is the need?
> >
> > I think it might be a useful functionality in some situations:
> > some users can attach/detach to external memory buffers (no mbufs)
> > and similar functionality is required.
>
> Attach to external memory buffer (raw buffer) is not currently supported.
>
> > Let say right now examples/vhost/main.c has its own pktmbuf_detach_zcp()
>
> You should look at the commit http://dpdk.org/commit/68363d85
> "examples/vhost: remove the non-working zero copy code"
>
> > which is doing pretty much the same - restore original values, after detaching
> > mbuf from external (virtio) memory buffer.
> > Would be good if we'll use a standard API function here.
>
> You are welcome to implement mbuf attach to raw buffer.
> But it is not a requirement for this fix.
Hmm, still not sure why we can't keep an existing function?
Obviously it wouldn't cost anything and I still think might be useful.
Konstantin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-15 15:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Hiroyuki Mikita
2016-05-16 0:05 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-16 2:46 ` Hiroyuki MIKITA
2016-05-16 8:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-16 9:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-16 16:24 ` Hiroyuki MIKITA
2016-05-16 8:52 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-16 16:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Hiroyuki Mikita
2016-05-17 10:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-05-17 11:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-17 12:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-17 12:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-17 13:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-17 13:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2016-05-17 14:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-17 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-05-17 16:12 ` Hiroyuki MIKITA
2016-05-17 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Hiroyuki Mikita
2016-05-18 11:58 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-18 14:29 ` Hiroyuki Mikita
2016-05-18 14:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Hiroyuki Mikita
2016-05-18 15:51 ` Olivier Matz
2016-05-19 12:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B518CE@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=h.mikita89@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).