DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/7] e1000: add rx interrupt support
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:48:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F35289@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562DD7D0.8060808@intel.com>

Thanks Cunming, I'll send out v2 patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liang, Cunming
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 3:36 PM
> To: Liu, Yong; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/7] e1000: add rx interrupt support
> 
> Hi Yong,
> 
> On 9/25/2015 4:28 PM, Yong Liu wrote:
> > From: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > Enable rx interrupt support on e1000 PF non-IOV mode.
> As I know, e1000 hasn't IOV mode. It's not necessary to mention PF
> non-IOV mode or not.
> In addition, it's necessary to mention the patch series is to support
> uio/vfio or both? To allow physical/emulation or both?
> >
The patch work with uio and vfio+msi mode. It support both physical device and qemu emulated device. 
This information will be added into cover letter.

> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > index 912f5dd..99beb9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_ethdev.c
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static int eth_em_flow_ctrl_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> >   static int eth_em_flow_ctrl_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >   				struct rte_eth_fc_conf *fc_conf);
> >   static int eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > +static int eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >   static int eth_em_interrupt_get_status(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >   static int eth_em_interrupt_action(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >   static void eth_em_interrupt_handler(struct rte_intr_handle *handle,
> > @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ static void em_vlan_hw_strip_disable(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >   static void eth_em_vlan_filter_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >   					uint16_t vlan_id, int on);
> >   */
> > +static void em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw);
> >   static int eth_em_led_on(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >   static int eth_em_led_off(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> >
> > @@ -608,6 +610,9 @@ eth_em_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >   			return ret;
> >   		}
> >   	}
> > +	/* check if rxq interrupt is enabled */
> > +	if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq != 0)
> > +		eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(dev);
> >
> >   	adapter->stopped = 0;
> >
> > @@ -1276,6 +1281,39 @@ eth_em_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >   	return (0);
> >   }
> >
> > +/* It clears the interrupt causes and enables the interrupt.
> Comments start from next line of '/*' or '/**'?
> > + * It will be called once only during nic initialized.
> > + *
> > + * @param dev
> > + *  Pointer to struct rte_eth_dev.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + *  - On success, zero.
> > + *  - On failure, a negative value.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +eth_em_rxq_interrupt_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct e1000_hw *hw =
> > +	E1000_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > +
> > +	E1000_READ_REG(hw, E1000_ICR);
> > +	em_rxq_intr_enable(hw);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* It enable receive packet interrupt.
> The same.
> > + * @param hw
> > + * Pointer to struct e1000_hw
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +em_rxq_intr_enable(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > +	E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, E1000_IMS, E1000_IMS_RXT0);
> To make sure post-write be finished immediately, E1000_WRITE_FLUSH()
> shall add behind.

Thanks, will added into v2 patch.
> > +}
> > +
> >   /*
> >    * It reads ICR and gets interrupt causes, check it and set a bit flag
> >    * to update link status.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-27 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-25  8:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/7] interrupt mode for e1000 Yong Liu
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/7] e1000: add rx interrupt support Yong Liu
2015-10-26  7:35   ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-27 14:48     ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/7] e1000: separate lsc and rxq interrupt function Yong Liu
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/7] e1000: add ethdev rxq enable and disable function Yong Liu
2015-10-26  7:37   ` Liang, Cunming
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/7] e1000: add rxq interrupt handler Yong Liu
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/7] e1000: check lsc and rxq not enable in the same time Yong Liu
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/7] e1000: lsc interrupt setup only enable itself Yong Liu
2015-09-25  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 7/7] l3fwd-power: disable interrupt when wake up from sleep Yong Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E10F35289@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).