DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	"Vargas, Hernan" <hernan.vargas@intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"gakhil@marvell.com" <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: "mdr@ashroe.eu" <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:52:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44510D4608F9EF928191C081F8689@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <819762f1-fd1f-9af3-e8db-97dab06aadc6@redhat.com>

Hi Tom, 
I had answered all of your comments from v4 before I went on time off. 
Let me know if any concern acking that v5, thanks
Nic

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 1:20 PM
> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Chautru, Nicolas
> <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net;
> gakhil@marvell.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
> Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> david.marchand@redhat.com; stephen@networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200
> 
> Hernan
> 
> The changes I requested in v4, were not addressed in v5.
> 
> Can you make these changes for v6?
> 
> Tom
> 
> On 7/22/22 11:29 AM, Vargas, Hernan wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > The patch series for the ACC200 can wait until Nic's back.
> > Our priority are the changes for the bbdev API here:
> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23912
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hernan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2022 8:08 AM
> > To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin
> > <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Chautru, Nicolas
> > <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net;
> > gakhil@marvell.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
> > Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> > david.marchand@redhat.com; stephen@networkplumber.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200
> >
> >
> > On 7/14/22 11:49 AM, Vargas, Hernan wrote:
> >> Hi Tom, Maxime,
> >>
> >> Could you please review the v5 series that Nic submitted last week?
> >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23912
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hernan
> > Hernan,
> >
> > For this patch series for the acc200, will you be able to refactor it so acc
> has a common base ?
> >
> > Or will this be on hold until Nic is back ?
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 8:49 AM
> >> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> >> thomas@monjalon.net; gakhil@marvell.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com;
> >> trix@redhat.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> >> Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> >> david.marchand@redhat.com; stephen@networkplumber.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200
> >>
> >> Hi Nicolas, Hernan,
> >>
> >> (Adding Hernan in the recipients list)
> >>
> >> On 7/8/22 02:01, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> >>> This is targeting 22.11 and includes the PMD for the integrated
> >>> accelerator on Intel Xeon SPR-EEC.
> >>> There is a dependency on that parallel serie still in-flight which
> >>> extends the bbdev api
> >>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23894
> >>>
> >>> I will be offline for a few weeks for the summer break but Hernan
> >>> will cover for me during that time if required.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Nic
> >>>
> >>> Nicolas Chautru (10):
> >>>      baseband/acc200: introduce PMD for ACC200
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add HW register definitions
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add info get function
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add queue configuration
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add LDPC processing functions
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add LTE processing functions
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add support for FFT operations
> >>>      baseband/acc200: support interrupt
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add device status and vf2pf comms
> >>>      baseband/acc200: add PF configure companion function
> >>>
> >>>     MAINTAINERS                              |    3 +
> >>>     app/test-bbdev/meson.build               |    3 +
> >>>     app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c         |   76 +
> >>>     doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst             |  244 ++
> >>>     doc/guides/bbdevs/index.rst              |    1 +
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h |  468 +++
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h     |  690 ++++
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h |   89 +
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build      |    8 +
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h |  115 +
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c | 5403
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>     drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map      |   10 +
> >>>     drivers/baseband/meson.build             |    1 +
> >>>     13 files changed, 7111 insertions(+)
> >>>     create mode 100644 doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c
> >>>     create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map
> >>>
> >> Comparing ACC200 & ACC100 header files, I understand ACC200 is an
> evolution of the ACC10x family. The FEC bits are really close, ACC200 main
> addition seems to be FFT acceleration which could be handled in ACC10x
> driver based on device ID.
> >>
> >> I think both drivers have to be merged in order to avoid code duplication.
> That's how other families of devices (e.g. i40e) are handled.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Maxime
> >>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-08  0:01 Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] baseband/acc200: introduce PMD for ACC200 Nicolas Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08   ` [PATCH v2 00/11] baseband/acc200 Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 01/11] baseband/acc100: refactory to segregate common code Nic Chautru
2022-09-12 15:19       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 02/11] baseband/acc200: introduce PMD for ACC200 Nic Chautru
2022-09-12 15:41       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 03/11] baseband/acc200: add HW register definitions Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 04/11] baseband/acc200: add info get function Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 05/11] baseband/acc200: add queue configuration Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 06/11] baseband/acc200: add LDPC processing functions Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 07/11] baseband/acc200: add LTE " Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 08/11] baseband/acc200: add support for FFT operations Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 09/11] baseband/acc200: support interrupt Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 10/11] baseband/acc200: add device status and vf2pf comms Nic Chautru
2022-09-12  1:08     ` [PATCH v2 11/11] baseband/acc200: add PF configure companion function Nic Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] baseband/acc200: add HW register definitions Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] baseband/acc200: add info get function Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] baseband/acc200: add queue configuration Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] baseband/acc200: add LDPC processing functions Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] baseband/acc200: add LTE " Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] baseband/acc200: add support for FFT operations Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] baseband/acc200: support interrupt Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] baseband/acc200: add device status and vf2pf comms Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-08  0:01 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] baseband/acc200: add PF configure companion function Nicolas Chautru
2022-07-12 13:48 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200 Maxime Coquelin
2022-07-14 18:49   ` Vargas, Hernan
2022-07-17 13:08     ` Tom Rix
2022-07-22 18:29       ` Vargas, Hernan
2022-07-22 20:19         ` Tom Rix
2022-08-15 17:52           ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2022-08-30  7:44   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-08-30 19:45     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-08-31 16:43       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-08-31 19:20         ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-31 19:26       ` Tom Rix
2022-08-31 22:37         ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-09-01  0:28           ` Tom Rix
2022-09-01  1:26             ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-09-01 13:49               ` Tom Rix
2022-09-01 20:34                 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-09-06 12:51                   ` Tom Rix
2022-09-14 10:35                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-14 11:50                       ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-14 13:19                         ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-14 13:27                           ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-09-14 13:44                           ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-09-14 14:23                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-14 19:57                               ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-09-14 20:08                                 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44510D4608F9EF928191C081F8689@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).