DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Van Haaren Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	 Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>,
	Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
	 Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	 Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
	 Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: promote some service core functions to stable
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 22:16:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xV1dXz3=a5pzyKvnUAqKMZWxQp0f+tTtEAz=ofWYrc0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x7L8UjcjSX=JdG4Vv3nvdpS=TNzHCkaBHNOqTXf13RsQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:45 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:26 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> writes:
>>
>> > The functions rte_service_may_be_active(), rte_service_lcore_attr_get(),
>> > and rte_service_attr_reset_all() were introduced nearly a year ago in
>> DPDK
>> > 18.08. They can be considered non-experimental for the 19.08 release.
>> >
>> > rte_service_may_be_active() is used by eventdev and the sw PMD, and this
>> > commit allows them to not need any experimental API.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/event/sw/Makefile                   |  1 -
>> >  drivers/event/sw/meson.build                |  1 -
>> >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_service.h | 15 +++------------
>> >  lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c         |  6 +++---
>> >  lib/librte_eal/rte_eal_version.map          |  6 +++---
>> >  lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile                |  1 -
>> >  lib/librte_eventdev/meson.build             |  1 -
>> >  7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/Makefile b/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
>> > index 81236a392..c6600e836 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
>> > +++ b/drivers/event/sw/Makefile
>> > @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.vars.mk
>> >  LIB = librte_pmd_sw_event.a
>> >
>> >  # build flags
>> > -CFLAGS += -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
>> >  CFLAGS += -O3
>> >  CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
>> >  # for older GCC versions, allow us to initialize an event using
>> > diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/meson.build b/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
>> > index 30d221647..985012219 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
>> > +++ b/drivers/event/sw/meson.build
>> > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> >  # Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation
>> >
>> > -allow_experimental_apis = true
>>
>> I don't think you can remove these.  There are still some experimental
>> APIs (f.e. the rename for rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_private_data
>> marked that function as experimental and it will cause build breakage).
>>
>> Maybe I'm mis understanding it?  It would be good to get verification
>> from Bruce whether that API should not be marked as experimental (it was
>> just a rename, so not sure...) - maybe that's a follow up for this
>> patch?
>>
>> See: https://travis-ci.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/209722145 for an example
>>
>> The odd thing is I only see it on the clang builds - perhaps it's a
>> missing definition for the clang compiler.
>>
>
> Erf, it looks like the __rte_experimental tag is affected by the order in
> the declaration of the symbol.
>
> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h
> @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev_asym_session *
> __rte_experimental
>   *  - On success return pointer to user data.
>   *  - On failure returns NULL.
>   */
> -void * __rte_experimental
> +__rte_experimental void *
>  rte_cryptodev_sym_session_get_user_data(
>                                         struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session
> *sess);
>
>
https://hastebin.com/micomogoqi.cs

Does it mean that the "void *" type had been marked as deprecated with the
previous syntax?
Requesting compiler experts assistance :-)


-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 16:42 Gage Eads
2019-06-20 18:25 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-20 18:39   ` Eads, Gage
2019-06-20 19:45   ` David Marchand
2019-06-20 20:16     ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-06-21 12:45       ` David Marchand
2019-06-21 16:27         ` Neil Horman
2019-06-21 16:47           ` David Marchand
2019-06-21 17:40             ` Neil Horman
2019-06-21 19:58               ` David Marchand
2019-06-22 16:17                 ` Neil Horman
2019-06-22 17:51                   ` David Marchand
2019-06-22 19:33                     ` Neil Horman
2019-06-20 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gage Eads
2019-06-27 12:48   ` David Marchand
2019-06-27 16:25     ` Eads, Gage
2019-07-08 10:23   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xV1dXz3=a5pzyKvnUAqKMZWxQp0f+tTtEAz=ofWYrc0A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).