DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: wathsala.vithanage@arm.com, jspewock@iol.unh.edu,
	probb@iol.unh.edu,  Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
	lijuan.tu@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,  dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dts: fabric requirements
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:42:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOb5WZYEtgAzWZp5oO13hZ1ex-p9Qec8FPqQQXx1aOtoJm6V5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5667444.DvuYhMxLoT@thomas>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:48 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 04/04/2023 13:51, Juraj Linkeš:
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:18 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > 03/04/2023 16:56, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 03/04/2023 13:46, Juraj Linkeš:
> > > > > > Replace pexpect with Fabric.
> > > > >
> > > > > You should squash these lines with the move to Fabric.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  dts/poetry.lock    | 553
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > > >
> > > > > Do we really need *all* these lines?
> > > > > I see a lot of lines about Windows and MacOSX which are not supported
> > > in
> > > > > DTS.
> > > > > It is so long that it looks impossible to review.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > This is a generated file and doesn't need to be reviewed.
> > >
> > > In general, I don't like storing generated files.
> > >
> >
> > Me neither, but this one is specifically designed to be stored in a
> > repository:
> > https://python-poetry.org/docs/basic-usage/#commit-your-poetrylock-file-to-version-control
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > I separated the
> > > > dependencies part so that the code part is easier to review. If you
> > > want, I
> > > > can squash the two commits.
> > >
> > > What happens if we manually remove the useless lines?
> > >
> > >
> > The lock file is there so that everyone installs exactly the same versions
> > of dependencies. We can specify the versions of dependencies in
> > pyproject.toml, but we won't control the versions of dependencies of
> > dependencies this way. If we remove the changes to the lock file, then we
> > won't be storing tested versions, everyone would be using slightly
> > different versions and we may potentially need to address versioning issues
> > in the future - best to prevent that with a lock file.
>
> You didn't answer about removing the usuless lines, like unneeded Windows support.
>

Do you mean the list of files from macos and windows? I tried removing
those from mypy and testing it and it looks like it didn't have an
impact, but I don't know the inner workings of poetry and the lock
file to test it properly (i.e. to rule out any breakages). What would
be the reason for removing those? Seems like it has more downsides (we
could potentially break something and it's extra work) than updsides
(as this is a generated file, I don't really see any).

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-03 11:46 Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-03 11:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] dts: replace pexpect with fabric Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-24 13:35   ` [PATCH v2] " Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-28 19:03     ` Jeremy Spewock
2023-05-02 13:00       ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-05-03 17:54         ` Jeremy Spewock
2023-06-09  9:46     ` [PATCH v3] " Juraj Linkeš
2023-06-21 18:33       ` Jeremy Spewock
2023-07-05 19:59         ` Jeremy Spewock
2023-07-12 16:34         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-07-09  1:45       ` Patrick Robb
2023-04-03 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] dts: fabric requirements Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-03 14:56   ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-03 15:17     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-04 11:51       ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-11 14:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-12 13:42           ` Juraj Linkeš [this message]
2023-04-12 15:24             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-12 15:38               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-04-13  6:50                 ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-13  7:49                   ` Juraj Linkeš

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOb5WZYEtgAzWZp5oO13hZ1ex-p9Qec8FPqQQXx1aOtoJm6V5A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).