patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>,
	Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx5: fix secondary process resource	leakage
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 08:01:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB7PR05MB4426B7258025DF0B9EE657A0C32D0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533076684-19078-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com>

Hi Ophir,

Wednesday, August 1, 2018 1:38 AM, Ophir Munk:
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/mlx5: fix secondary process resource
> leakage
> 
> When running testpmd with an mlx5 device and then executing at testpmd
> prompt in a raw: "port start all" followed by "port stop all"
> a new file named /var/tmp/net_mlx5_<socket num> is created as a result of
> creating a new unix domain socket (used for communication between the
> primary and secondary processes).
> When the new unix socket file is created the old unix socket file should have
> been removed. This commit fixes it by closing the old unix socket just before
> creating the new one in function mlx5_socket_init()
> 
> Fixes: f8b9a3bad467 ("net/mlx5: install a socket to exchange a file
> descriptor")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_socket.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_socket.c
> b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_socket.c index 99297d5..a3a5229 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_socket.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_socket.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
>  	int flags;
> 
>  	/*
> +	 * Close the last socket that was used to communicate
> +	 * with the secondary process
> +	 */
> +	if (priv->primary_socket)
> +		mlx5_socket_uninit(dev);

On the current code the primary socket is created on port start and removed on port close (this is the bug you address).
Wouldn't it be better to just create it on probe?
This way the primary sets up its socket when the ethdev is created and removes it when it is destroyed. The handling of the socket event still happen only when the primary ports start because only then the interrupt handler is installed.  

> +	/*
>  	 * Initialise the socket to communicate with the secondary
>  	 * process.
>  	 */
> --
> 1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-01  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31 22:38 [dpdk-stable] " Ophir Munk
2018-08-01  8:01 ` Shahaf Shuler [this message]
2018-08-02 10:40   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Shahaf Shuler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB7PR05MB4426B7258025DF0B9EE657A0C32D0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).