From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:31:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CBDF69B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712195846.65286-1-jblunck@infradead.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:59 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2
>
> This series is a preparation to move the vdev bus out of librte_eal. For that
> the newly added cryptodev vdev functions need to change signature to not
> require the rte_vdev.h header.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - move params parsing into new header
> - make rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() static inline
>
> Jan Blunck (4):
> cryptodev: remove obsolete include
> cryptodev: move initialization
> cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h
> cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header
>
> lib/librte_cryptodev/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 3 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 1 -
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.c | 37 +---------
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h | 71 ++++++++-----------
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h | 89
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map | 1 -
> 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h
>
> --
> 2.13.2
Hi Jan,
Since there are some issues in this patchset and knowing that these changes are required
for work to be done in 17.11 (vdev moving out of EAL), let's postpone this for the next release,
as also there is no API breakage in this (correct me if I am wrong).
Thanks,
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-19 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 7:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] " Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:35 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cryptodev: rework cryptodev PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 13:07 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-15 11:04 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-04 14:32 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-05 14:52 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-05 15:19 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-07-19 13:31 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2017-07-27 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-08-01 10:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 Jan Blunck
2017-10-25 14:33 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-25 16:05 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:47 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-10 11:29 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 12:49 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-11 14:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:48 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CBDF69B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).