DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
To: santosh <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	<dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/test: support default mempool autotest
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:51:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7bce97e-72e3-b342-f55b-7e3625ceb58a@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4cec74d-685e-0f7d-b499-640e1ed39156@caviumnetworks.com>

Hi Santosh,

On Wednesday 05 April 2017 12:32 PM, santosh wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2017 11:27 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>
>> From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
>>
>> Mempool test currently supports:
>>  * ring_mp_mc
>>  * stack
>>
>> Adding a new default pool options. So, ring* + stack + default
>> (which can be 'stack' or 'ring')
>>  * This way, whatever the value of RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS is set,
>>    it would be verified.
>>  * even if that means duplicating some test (for example when "stack" is
>>    set as default and it already part of standard test)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> v3: fix the incorrect split
>> v2: split the fix from change
>>
>>  test/test/test_mempool.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/test/test/test_mempool.c b/test/test/test_mempool.c
>> index 715b250..6f0ca84 100644
>> --- a/test/test/test_mempool.c
>> +++ b/test/test/test_mempool.c
>> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
>>  	struct rte_mempool *mp_cache = NULL;
>>  	struct rte_mempool *mp_nocache = NULL;
>>  	struct rte_mempool *mp_stack = NULL;
>> +	struct rte_mempool *default_pool = NULL;
>>
>>  	rte_atomic32_init(&synchro);
>>
>> @@ -562,6 +563,30 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
>>  	}
>>  	rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp_stack, my_obj_init, NULL);
>>
>> +	/* Create a mempool based on Default handler, if not "stack" */
>> +	printf("Testing %s mempool handler\n",
>> +	       RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS);
>> +	default_pool = rte_mempool_create_empty("default_pool",
>> +						MEMPOOL_SIZE,
>> +						MEMPOOL_ELT_SIZE,
>> +						RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0,
>> +						SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
>> +
>> +	if (default_pool == NULL) {
>> +		printf("cannot allocate default mempool\n");
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +	if (rte_mempool_set_ops_byname(default_pool,
>> +				RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS, NULL) < 0) {
>> +		printf("cannot set default handler\n");
>
> Few nits:
>
> printf("cannot allocate %s mempool\n",
> 	RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS)

Ok. I will change this.

>
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +	if (rte_mempool_populate_default(default_pool) < 0) {
>> +		printf("cannot populate default mempool\n");
>
> ditto..

ok

>
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +	rte_mempool_obj_iter(default_pool, my_obj_init, NULL);
>> +
>>  	/* retrieve the mempool from its name */
>>  	if (rte_mempool_lookup("test_nocache") != mp_nocache) {
>>  		printf("Cannot lookup mempool from its name\n");
>> @@ -606,6 +631,9 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
>>  	if (test_mempool_basic(mp_stack, 1) < 0)
>>  		goto err;
>>
>> +	if (test_mempool_basic(default_pool, 1) < 0)
>> +		goto err;
>> +
>>  	rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
>>
>>  	ret = 0;
>> @@ -614,6 +642,8 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
>>  	rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
>>  	rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
>>  	rte_mempool_free(mp_stack);
>> +	rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
>> +
>
> Rest looks okay to me:
> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>

Thanks. I will send v4 of this.

>
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 10:17 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] " Shreyansh Jain
2017-03-31 13:59 ` Olivier Matz
2017-03-31 14:11   ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-03-31 15:11 ` Santosh Shukla
2017-04-03  9:27   ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-03  9:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/test: free mempool on exit Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-03  9:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/test: support default mempool autotest Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-04  5:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/test: free mempool on exit Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-04  5:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/test: support default mempool autotest Hemant Agrawal
2017-04-05  7:02       ` santosh
2017-04-05  7:21         ` Shreyansh Jain [this message]
2017-04-04 15:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/test: free mempool on exit santosh
2017-04-05  9:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Shreyansh Jain
2017-04-05  9:35       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/test: support default mempool autotest Shreyansh Jain
2017-04-07 15:42         ` Olivier Matz
2017-04-19 13:10           ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-07 15:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] test/test: free mempool on exit Olivier Matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7bce97e-72e3-b342-f55b-7e3625ceb58a@nxp.com \
    --to=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).