From: "Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add WC store functions
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 10:15:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3ca8034-9b25-be38-8808-269506a545c3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wS-pnYk37q6mK7MgVsK3qBre78VWBecpDUKfaBticWOA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David, thanks for reviewing!
Some comments inline.
On 7/3/2020 4:19 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:24 AM Radu Nicolau<radu.nicolau@intel.com> wrote:
>> +static inline void
>> +rte_write32_wc(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr);
> This is a new API, and even if inlined, it should be marked experimental.
Will do.
> Is volatile necessary?
Yes, most of these functions will be called on mmio addresses/volatile
pointers. All other io functions have it.
>
> +static inline void
> +rte_write32_wc_relaxed(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr);
> +
> +
> Double empty line (there are some other in this patch that I won't flag again).
I will check all occurrences.
>
>
>> #endif /* __DOXYGEN__ */
>>
>> #ifndef RTE_OVERRIDE_IO_H
>> @@ -345,6 +378,20 @@ rte_write64(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> rte_write64_relaxed(value, addr);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifndef RTE_NATIVE_WRITE32_WC
> Missing return type, this causes build failure on anything but x86.
Yes, got lost in the copy/paste. I will fix it in the next version
>
>
>> +rte_write32_wc(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> +{
>> + rte_write32(value, addr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __rte_always_inline void
>> +rte_write32_wc_relaxed(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> +{
>> + rte_write32_relaxed(value, addr);
>> +}
>> +#endif /* RTE_NATIVE_WRITE32_WC */
>> +
>> +
>> #endif /* RTE_OVERRIDE_IO_H */
>>
>> #endif /* _RTE_IO_H_ */
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_io.h b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_io.h
>> index 2db71b1..c95ed67 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_io.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_io.h
>> @@ -9,8 +9,64 @@
>> extern "C" {
>> #endif
>>
>> +#include "rte_cpuflags.h"
> Inclusion of this header should be out of the extern "C" block.
Why? It is used elsewhere inside the extern "C" block e.g.
x86/rte_spinlock.h
>
>
>> +
>> +#define RTE_NATIVE_WRITE32_WC
>> #include "generic/rte_io.h"
>>
>> +/**
>> + * @internal
>> + * MOVDIRI wrapper.
>> + */
>> +static __rte_always_inline void
>> +_rte_x86_movdiri(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> +{
>> + asm volatile(
>> + /* MOVDIRI */
>> + ".byte 0x40, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf9, 0x02"
>> + :
>> + : "a" (value), "d" (addr));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __rte_always_inline void
>> +rte_write32_wc(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> +{
>> + static int _x86_movdiri_flag = -1;
>> + if (_x86_movdiri_flag == 1) {
>> + rte_wmb();
>> + _rte_x86_movdiri(value, addr);
>> + } else if (_x86_movdiri_flag == 0) {
>> + rte_write32(value, addr);
>> + } else {
>> + _x86_movdiri_flag =
>> + (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_MOVDIRI) > 0);
> Can't this cpu flag check be moved in a constructor?
> This would avoid this copy/paste.
We evaluated this approach but it creates more problems than if fixes -
it will need a variable that needs to be exported and there is no good
place to put it.
>
>
>> + if (_x86_movdiri_flag == 1) {
>> + rte_wmb();
>> + _rte_x86_movdiri(value, addr);
>> + } else {
>> + rte_write32(value, addr);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __rte_always_inline void
>> +rte_write32_wc_relaxed(uint32_t value, volatile void *addr)
>> +{
>> + static int _x86_movdiri_flag = -1;
> Same check with a static variable with the same name.
It should be no problem, they are static local variables.
>
>
> I wonder if wrapping all of this in a single function would be more elegant.
> Then rte_write32_wc(|_relaxed) would call it with a flag.
Yes, it will be more elegant but also it will cost more, it was written
like this to minimize the number of branches taken for the movdiri path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-06 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 10:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] eal/x86: add WC store function Radu Nicolau
2020-06-11 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] net/i40e: use movdiri to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-06-11 12:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] eal/x86: add WC store function Jerin Jacob
2020-06-11 13:56 ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-06-11 15:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-06-15 11:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-06-19 12:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-06-19 12:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-01 13:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-01 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: add WC store functions Bruce Richardson
2020-07-01 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-01 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-01 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-02 9:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-02 9:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-03 15:19 ` David Marchand
2020-07-06 9:15 ` Nicolau, Radu [this message]
2020-07-02 9:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-06 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-06 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-06 12:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-13 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-13 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-13 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-13 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-13 12:44 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-13 12:52 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-07-13 12:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-07-13 12:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/ixgbe: use WC store to update doorbell register Radu Nicolau
2020-07-16 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-16 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-16 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-16 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-16 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/ixgbe: use WC store to update doorbell register Radu Nicolau
2020-07-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 6:42 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-20 8:52 ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-07-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 6:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-20 8:54 ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-07-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-17 16:42 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-07-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-17 11:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-20 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 12:20 ` David Marchand
2020-07-21 8:56 ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-07-20 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-20 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-21 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/4] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-07-21 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/4] " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-21 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/4] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-07-21 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/4] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-07-21 11:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Radu Nicolau
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/5] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/5] " Radu Nicolau
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 2/5] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 1:19 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 3/5] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 1:20 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2020-08-26 9:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 5/5] net/ice: " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 1:20 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/5] eal: add WC store functions Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 1/5] " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 2/5] net/i40e: use WC store to update queue tail registers Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 3/5] common/qat: " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 5/5] net/ice: " Radu Nicolau
2020-10-08 7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/5] eal: add WC store functions David Marchand
2020-10-08 9:51 ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-10-13 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-13 12:50 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3ca8034-9b25-be38-8808-269506a545c3@intel.com \
--to=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).