DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 14/14] Fix the compiling of test-pmd on IBM Power Architecture
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:17:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416953837-15894-15-git-send-email-chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416953837-15894-1-git-send-email-chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch fixes compiling problems on IBM Power architecture and turn
on the test-pmd compiling option in configuration file. Actually, this
is an big endian compiling fix.

Signed-off-by: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/config.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index 9bc08f4..4fee6c0 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -612,8 +612,13 @@ ring_dma_zone_lookup(const char *ring_name, uint8_t port_id, uint16_t q_id)
 union igb_ring_dword {
 	uint64_t dword;
 	struct {
+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_BIG_ENDIAN
+		uint32_t lo;
+		uint32_t hi;
+#else
 		uint32_t hi;
 		uint32_t lo;
+#endif
 	} words;
 };
 
@@ -656,23 +661,29 @@ ring_rx_descriptor_display(const struct rte_memzone *ring_mz,
 		/* 32 bytes RX descriptor, i40e only */
 		struct igb_ring_desc_32_bytes *ring =
 			(struct igb_ring_desc_32_bytes *)ring_mz->addr;
+		ring[desc_id].lo_dword.dword =
+			rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].lo_dword.dword);
+		ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].lo_dword);
+		ring[desc_id].hi_dword.dword =
+			rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].hi_dword.dword);
+		ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].hi_dword);
+		ring[desc_id].resv1.dword =
+			rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].resv1.dword);
+		ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].resv1);
+		ring[desc_id].resv2.dword =
+			rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].resv2.dword);
+		ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].resv2);
 
-		ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-				ring[desc_id].lo_dword));
-		ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-				ring[desc_id].hi_dword));
-		ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-				ring[desc_id].resv1));
-		ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-				ring[desc_id].resv2));
 		return;
 	}
 #endif
 	/* 16 bytes RX descriptor */
-	ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-			ring[desc_id].lo_dword));
-	ring_rxd_display_dword(rte_le_to_cpu_64(
-			ring[desc_id].hi_dword));
+	ring[desc_id].lo_dword.dword =
+		rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].lo_dword.dword);
+	ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].lo_dword);
+	ring[desc_id].hi_dword.dword =
+		rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].hi_dword.dword);
+	ring_rxd_display_dword(ring[desc_id].hi_dword);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -682,8 +693,8 @@ ring_tx_descriptor_display(const struct rte_memzone *ring_mz, uint16_t desc_id)
 	struct igb_ring_desc_16_bytes txd;
 
 	ring = (struct igb_ring_desc_16_bytes *)ring_mz->addr;
-	txd.lo_dword = rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].lo_dword);
-	txd.hi_dword = rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].hi_dword);
+	txd.lo_dword.dword = rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].lo_dword.dword);
+	txd.hi_dword.dword = rte_le_to_cpu_64(ring[desc_id].hi_dword.dword);
 	printf("    0x%08X - 0x%08X / 0x%08X - 0x%08X\n",
 			(unsigned)txd.lo_dword.words.lo,
 			(unsigned)txd.lo_dword.words.hi,
-- 
1.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-25 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25 22:17 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/14] Patches for DPDK to support Power architecture Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/14] Add compiling definations for IBM " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/14] Add atomic operations " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/14] Add byte order " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/14] Add CPU cycle " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/14] Add prefetch operation " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/14] Add spinlock " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/14] Add vector memcpy " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/14] Add CPU flag checking " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/14] Remove iopl operation " Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/14] Add cache size define for IBM Power Architecture Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/14] Add huge page size define for IBM Power architecture Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 12/14] Add eal memory support for IBM Power Architecture Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 13/14] test_memzone:fix finding the second smallest segment Chao Zhu
2014-11-25 22:17 ` Chao Zhu [this message]
2014-11-26  9:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/14] Patches for DPDK to support Power architecture David Marchand
2014-11-26 20:57   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1416953837-15894-15-git-send-email-chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).