From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: patrick.fu@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: fix wrong async completion of multi-seg packets
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:40:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145b4c3e-970f-ae39-2ea4-accc8f95c151@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721054720.3417804-1-patrick.fu@intel.com>
On 7/21/20 7:47 AM, patrick.fu@intel.com wrote:
> From: Patrick Fu <patrick.fu@intel.com>
>
> In async enqueue copy, a packet could be split into multiple copy
> segments. When polling the copy completion status, current async data
> path assumes the async device callbacks are aware of the packet
> boundary and return completed segments only if all segments belonging
> to the same packet are done. Such assumption are not generic to common
> async devices and may degrees the copy performance if async callbacks
s/degrees/degrades/
> have to implement it in software manner.
>
> This patch adds tracking of the completed copy segments at vhost side.
> If async copy device reports partial completion of a packets, only
> vhost internal record is updated and vring status keeps unchanged
> until remaining segments of the packet are also finished. The async
> copy device is no longer necessary to care about the packet boundary.
>
> Fixes: cd6760da1076 ("vhost: introduce async enqueue for split ring")
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Fu <patrick.fu@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix an issue that can stuck async poll when packets buffer is full
> v3:
> - revise commit message and title
> - rename a local variable to better reflect its usage
>
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h | 3 +++
> lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
With above typo fixed (can be done when applying, no need to resend):
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 7:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] vhost: support async copy free segmentations patrick.fu
2020-07-15 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " patrick.fu
2020-07-17 3:21 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-07-17 11:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-20 14:58 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-20 16:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-07-21 5:52 ` Fu, Patrick
2020-07-21 5:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] vhost: fix wrong async completion of multi-seg packets patrick.fu
2020-07-21 8:40 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2020-07-21 14:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145b4c3e-970f-ae39-2ea4-accc8f95c151@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=patrick.fu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).