* [PATCH v1] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
@ 2022-06-09 2:39 Huichao Cai
2022-06-09 14:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Huichao Cai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-06-09 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 8 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 26 ++++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index 610a86b..e565e86 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -408,10 +408,16 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..767320b 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,32 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * <errno>.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index a562424..1142b5a 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -262,3 +262,168 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * <errno>.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
+ unlikely(pkt_in->pool == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate buffer from pkt_in->pool*/
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pkt_in->pool);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ rte_memcpy(
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ out_pkt, char *, out_pkt->pkt_len),
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
+ len);
+ out_pkt->data_len = (uint16_t)(len +
+ out_pkt->data_len);
+
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = (uint16_t)(len +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len);
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index e537224..4aa66bc 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-06-09 2:39 [PATCH v1] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API Huichao Cai
@ 2022-06-09 14:19 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-10 23:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
0 siblings, 2 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-06-09 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 8 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 26 ++++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index 610a86b..e565e86 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -408,10 +408,16 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..3e1a9ac 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,32 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index a562424..9e050cc 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -262,3 +262,168 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
+ unlikely(pkt_in->pool == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate buffer from pkt_in->pool*/
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pkt_in->pool);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ rte_memcpy(
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ out_pkt, char *, out_pkt->pkt_len),
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
+ len);
+ out_pkt->data_len = (uint16_t)(len +
+ out_pkt->data_len);
+
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = (uint16_t)(len +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len);
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index e537224..4aa66bc 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-06-09 14:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-10 23:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-11 9:14 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-07-10 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chcchc88; +Cc: dev
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> Add some test data for this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
...
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,32 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf
> *pkt_in,
> struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
>
> /**
> + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> + *
> + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
> + *
> + * @param pkt_in
> + * The input packet.
> + * @param pkts_out
> + * Array storing the output fragments.
> + * @param nb_pkts_out
> + * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
> + * @param mtu_size
> + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing
> IPv4
> + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> + * @return
> + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> + * in the pkts_out array.
> + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int32_t
> +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> + uint16_t mtu_size);
> +
> +/**
> * This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
> * Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index a562424..9e050cc 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -262,3 +262,168 @@ static inline uint16_t
> __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
>
> return out_pkt_pos;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> + *
> + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
> + *
> + * @param pkt_in
> + * The input packet.
> + * @param pkts_out
> + * Array storing the output fragments.
> + * @param nb_pkts_out
> + * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
> + * @param mtu_size
> + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing
> IPv4
> + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> + * @return
> + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> + * in the pkts_out array.
> + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> + */
> +int32_t
> +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> + uint16_t mtu_size)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
> + uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
> + uint32_t more_in_segs;
> + uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
> + uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
> + uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
> + uint16_t ipopt_len;
> +
> + /*
> + * Formal parameter checking.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
> + unlikely(pkt_in->pool == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
> + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
> +
> + /* Check IP header length */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
> + * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
> + */
> + frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
> + IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
> +
> + flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
> +
> + /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
> + if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> +
> + /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
> + if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
> + (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + in_seg = pkt_in;
> + in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
> + out_pkt_pos = 0;
> + fragment_offset = 0;
> +
> + ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
> + if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + more_in_segs = 1;
> + while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
> + uint32_t more_out_segs;
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
> +
> + /* Allocate buffer from pkt_in->pool*/
> + out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pkt_in->pool);
Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
parameter for that function.
In a same way we have it for rte_ipv4_fragment_packet().
> + if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
> + __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
> + out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
> + out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
> + frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
> +
> + more_out_segs = 1;
> + while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
If I understand correctly, here you assume that out_pkt will always
be big enough to hold entire fragment, right?
But that can not always be the case and probably we shouldn't assume
that for generic function.
I suppose safest way would be either use rte_pktmbuf_copy() here
directly or do something similar to what that function doing ourselves here.
> + uint32_t len;
> +
> + len = frag_bytes_remaining;
> + if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
> + len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
> +
> + rte_memcpy(
> + rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
> + out_pkt, char *, out_pkt->pkt_len),
> + rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
> + in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
> + len);
> + out_pkt->data_len = (uint16_t)(len +
> + out_pkt->data_len);
> +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len = (uint16_t)(len +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len);
> + in_seg_data_pos += len;
> + frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
> +
> + /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
> + if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
> + more_out_segs = 0;
> +
> + /* Current input segment done ? */
> + if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
> + in_seg = in_seg->next;
> + in_seg_data_pos = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
> + more_in_segs = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Build the IP header */
> +
> + out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> +
> + __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
> + (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
> + flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
> +
> + if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
> + ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
> + ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
> + ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
> + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> +
> + header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
> + in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
> + } else {
> + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> + }
> +
> + /* Write the fragment to the output list */
> + pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
> + out_pkt_pos++;
> + }
> +
> + return out_pkt_pos;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> index e537224..4aa66bc 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> global:
>
> rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
> + rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-10 23:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-07-11 9:14 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-15 8:05 ` Huichao Cai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-07-11 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chcchc88; +Cc: dev
11/07/2022 00:35, Konstantin Ananyev пишет:
> > Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> > for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> > per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> > offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> > Add some test data for this API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> > ---
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> > +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> > @@ -179,6 +179,32 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf
> > *pkt_in,
> > struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
> >
> > /**
> > + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> > + *
> > + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
> > + *
> > + * @param pkt_in
> > + * The input packet.
> > + * @param pkts_out
> > + * Array storing the output fragments.
> > + * @param nb_pkts_out
> > + * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
> > + * @param mtu_size
> > + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing
> > IPv4
> > + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> > + * @return
> > + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> > + * in the pkts_out array.
> > + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +int32_t
> > +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> > + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> > + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> > + uint16_t mtu_size);
> > +
> > +/**
> > * This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
> > * Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup
> correctly.
> > *
> > diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> > b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> > index a562424..9e050cc 100644
> > --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> > +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> > @@ -262,3 +262,168 @@ static inline uint16_t
> > __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
> >
> > return out_pkt_pos;
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> > + *
> > + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
> > + *
> > + * @param pkt_in
> > + * The input packet.
> > + * @param pkts_out
> > + * Array storing the output fragments.
> > + * @param nb_pkts_out
> > + * The size of the array that stores the output fragments.
> > + * @param mtu_size
> > + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing
> > IPv4
> > + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> > + * @return
> > + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> > + * in the pkts_out array.
> > + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> > + */
> > +int32_t
> > +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> > + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> > + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> > + uint16_t mtu_size)
Forgot to mention, new API has to be experimental.
> > +{
> > + struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
> > + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
> > + uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
> > + uint32_t more_in_segs;
> > + uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
> > + uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
> > + uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
> > + uint16_t ipopt_len;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Formal parameter checking.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
> > + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
> > + unlikely(pkt_in->pool == NULL) ||
> > + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> > + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
> > + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
> > +
> > + /* Check IP header length */
> > + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
> > + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
> > + * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
> > + */
> > + frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
> > + IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
> > +
> > + flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
> > +
> > + /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
> > + if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > +
> > + /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
> > + if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
> > + (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + in_seg = pkt_in;
> > + in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
> > + out_pkt_pos = 0;
> > + fragment_offset = 0;
> > +
> > + ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
> > + if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + more_in_segs = 1;
> > + while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
> > + struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
> > + uint32_t more_out_segs;
> > + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
> > +
> > + /* Allocate buffer from pkt_in->pool*/
> > + out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pkt_in->pool);
>
>
> Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
> from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
> parameter for that function.
> In a same way we have it for rte_ipv4_fragment_packet().
>
> > + if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
> > + __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
> > + out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
> > + out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
> > + frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
> > +
> > + more_out_segs = 1;
> > + while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
>
>
> If I understand correctly, here you assume that out_pkt will always
> be big enough to hold entire fragment, right?
> But that can not always be the case and probably we shouldn't assume
> that for generic function.
> I suppose safest way would be either use rte_pktmbuf_copy() here
> directly or do something similar to what that function doing ourselves
> here.
>
>
> > + uint32_t len;
> > +
> > + len = frag_bytes_remaining;
> > + if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
> > + len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
> > +
> > + rte_memcpy(
> > + rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
> > + out_pkt, char *, out_pkt->pkt_len),
> > + rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
> > + in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
> > + len);
> > + out_pkt->data_len = (uint16_t)(len +
> > + out_pkt->data_len);
> > +
> > + out_pkt->pkt_len = (uint16_t)(len +
> > + out_pkt->pkt_len);
> > + in_seg_data_pos += len;
> > + frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
> > +
> > + /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
> > + if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
> > + more_out_segs = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Current input segment done ? */
> > + if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
> > + in_seg = in_seg->next;
> > + in_seg_data_pos = 0;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
> > + more_in_segs = 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Build the IP header */
> > +
> > + out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> > +
> > + __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
> > + (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
> > + flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
> > + ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
> > + ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
> > + ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
> > + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> > + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> > + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> > +
> > + header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
> > + in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
> > + } else {
> > + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> > + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> > + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Write the fragment to the output list */
> > + pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
> > + out_pkt_pos++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return out_pkt_pos;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> > index e537224..4aa66bc 100644
> > --- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> > +++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> > @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > global:
> >
> > rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
> > + rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
> > };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re:Re: [PATCH v2] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-11 9:14 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-07-15 8:05 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-19 8:19 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-15 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ananyev; +Cc: dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 904 bytes --]
Hi Konstantin,
I've been busy lately, sorry to reply to you late.
> Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
> from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
> parameter for that function.
> In a same way we have it for rte_ipv4_fragment_packet().
> If I understand correctly, here you assume that out_pkt will always
> be big enough to hold entire fragment, right?
> But that can not always be the case and probably we shouldn't assume
> that for generic function.
> I suppose safest way would be either use rte_pktmbuf_copy() here
> directly or do something similar to what that function doing ourselves here.
reply: Thanks for the reminder, I will use explicit parameters and rte_pktmbuf_copy();
> Forgot to mention, new API has to be experimental.
reply: Does this mean adding _rte_experimental when declaring a function?
Huichao,Cai
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4648 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-15 8:05 ` Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-19 8:19 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-07-19 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev
Hi Huichao,
>
> I've been busy lately, sorry to reply to you late.
No worries at all.
>
>> Instead of implicitly assuming that output mbufs will be allocated
>
>> from pkt_in pool, it would be better to have output_pool as explicit
>> parameter for that function.
>> In a same way we have it for rte_ipv4_fragment_packet().
>
>> If I understand correctly, here you assume that out_pkt will always
>> be big enough to hold entire fragment, right?
>> But that can not always be the case and probably we shouldn't assume
>> that for generic function.
>> I suppose safest way would be either use rte_pktmbuf_copy() here
>> directly or do something similar to what that function doing ourselves here.
>
> reply: Thanks for the reminder, I will use explicit parameters and rte_pktmbuf_copy();
>> Forgot to mention, new API has to be experimental.
>
> reply: Does this mean adding _rte_experimental when declaring a function?
>
Yes, I meant _rte_experimental tag.
Thanks
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-06-09 14:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-10 23:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-07-22 13:01 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 14:42 ` Morten Brørup
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-22 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 8 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 27 +++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index ba0ffd0..bb7c4d3 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -418,10 +418,16 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size,
+ pkt_pool);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..c2a7e1e 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,33 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index 27a8ad2..cb15781 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -83,6 +83,48 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return ipopt_len;
}
+static struct rte_mbuf *
+__copy_to_pktmbuf(char *src, struct rte_mbuf *m_head,
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_tail, struct rte_mempool *mp, uint32_t len)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_last, **prev;
+
+ m_last = m_tail;
+ prev = &m_last->next;
+ while (len > 0) {
+ uint32_t copy_len;
+
+ /* current buffer is full, chain a new one */
+ if (unlikely(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last) == 0)) {
+ m_last = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
+ if (unlikely(m_last == NULL))
+ return NULL;
+
+ ++m_head->nb_segs;
+ *prev = m_last;
+ prev = &m_last->next;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * copy the min of data in len
+ * vs space available in output (m_last)
+ */
+ copy_len = RTE_MIN(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last), len);
+
+ /* append from seg to m_last */
+ memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m_last, char *, m_last->data_len),
+ src, copy_len);
+
+ /* update offsets and lengths */
+ m_last->data_len += copy_len;
+ m_head->pkt_len += copy_len;
+ src += copy_len;
+ len -= copy_len;
+ }
+
+ return m_last;
+}
+
/**
* IPv4 fragmentation.
*
@@ -259,3 +301,169 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
+ unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(pool_direct != pkt_in->pool) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL, *tail_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate direct buffer */
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+ tail_pkt = out_pkt;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ tail_pkt = __copy_to_pktmbuf(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
+ out_pkt, tail_pkt, pool_direct, len);
+ if (unlikely(!tail_pkt)) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index b9c1cca..122ae8d 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-22 14:42 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH v4] " Huichao Cai
2 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-07-22 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai, dev, konstantin.v.ananyev; +Cc: Olivier Matz
> From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 15.02
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru
> Subject: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
>
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> Add some test data for this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 8 +-
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 27 +++++
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 208
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> index ba0ffd0..bb7c4d3 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,16 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> }
>
> if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
> - len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
> + if (i % 2)
> + len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out,
> BURST,
> tests[i].mtu_size,
> direct_pool,
> indirect_pool);
> + else
> + len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(b,
> pkts_out,
> + BURST,
> + tests[i].mtu_size,
> + pkt_pool);
> else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
> len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
> tests[i].mtu_size,
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> index 7d2abe1..c2a7e1e 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,33 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf
> *pkt_in,
> struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
>
> /**
> + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> + *
> + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
> + *
> + * @param pkt_in
> + * The input packet.
> + * @param pkts_out
> + * Array storing the output fragments.
> + * @param mtu_size
> + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing
> IPv4
> + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> + * @param pool_direct
> + * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output
> fragments.
> + * @return
> + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> + * in the pkts_out array.
> + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int32_t
> +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> + uint16_t mtu_size,
> + struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
> +
> +/**
> * This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
> * Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup
> correctly.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index 27a8ad2..cb15781 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,48 @@ static inline uint16_t
> __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
> return ipopt_len;
> }
>
> +static struct rte_mbuf *
> +__copy_to_pktmbuf(char *src, struct rte_mbuf *m_head,
> + struct rte_mbuf *m_tail, struct rte_mempool *mp, uint32_t len)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *m_last, **prev;
> +
> + m_last = m_tail;
> + prev = &m_last->next;
> + while (len > 0) {
> + uint32_t copy_len;
> +
> + /* current buffer is full, chain a new one */
> + if (unlikely(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last) == 0)) {
> + m_last = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> + if (unlikely(m_last == NULL))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + ++m_head->nb_segs;
> + *prev = m_last;
> + prev = &m_last->next;
> + }
I think that MBUF_FAST_FREE also requires non-segmented packets, although this requirement is missing in the documentation. I have asked Olivier (as MBUF maintainer) to confirm this requirement [1].
[1] http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D871C5@smartserver.smartshare.dk/
> +
> + /*
> + * copy the min of data in len
> + * vs space available in output (m_last)
> + */
> + copy_len = RTE_MIN(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last), len);
> +
> + /* append from seg to m_last */
> + memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m_last, char *, m_last-
> >data_len),
> + src, copy_len);
> +
> + /* update offsets and lengths */
> + m_last->data_len += copy_len;
> + m_head->pkt_len += copy_len;
> + src += copy_len;
> + len -= copy_len;
> + }
> +
> + return m_last;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * IPv4 fragmentation.
> *
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 14:42 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2022-07-22 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-22 15:52 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH v4] " Huichao Cai
2 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2022-07-22 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, konstantin.v.ananyev
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> Add some test data for this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is independent
of the fast free optimization.
Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 14:42 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2022-07-22 14:49 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-24 4:50 ` [PATCH v5] " Huichao Cai
2 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-22 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 8 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 29 +++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index ba0ffd0..8eddbe9 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -418,10 +418,16 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(b, pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size,
+ direct_pool);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..a84e5f7 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,35 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index 27a8ad2..326c640 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -83,6 +83,48 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return ipopt_len;
}
+static struct rte_mbuf *
+__copy_to_pktmbuf(char *src, struct rte_mbuf *m_head,
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_tail, struct rte_mempool *mp, uint32_t len)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *m_last, **prev;
+
+ m_last = m_tail;
+ prev = &m_last->next;
+ while (len > 0) {
+ uint32_t copy_len;
+
+ /* current buffer is full, chain a new one */
+ if (unlikely(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last) == 0)) {
+ m_last = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
+ if (unlikely(m_last == NULL))
+ return NULL;
+
+ ++m_head->nb_segs;
+ *prev = m_last;
+ prev = &m_last->next;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * copy the min of data in len
+ * vs space available in output (m_last)
+ */
+ copy_len = RTE_MIN(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(m_last), len);
+
+ /* append from seg to m_last */
+ memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m_last, char *, m_last->data_len),
+ src, copy_len);
+
+ /* update offsets and lengths */
+ m_last->data_len += copy_len;
+ m_head->pkt_len += copy_len;
+ src += copy_len;
+ len -= copy_len;
+ }
+
+ return m_last;
+}
+
/**
* IPv4 fragmentation.
*
@@ -259,3 +301,169 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL, *tail_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate direct buffer */
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+ tail_pkt = out_pkt;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ tail_pkt = __copy_to_pktmbuf(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(
+ in_seg, char *, in_seg_data_pos),
+ out_pkt, tail_pkt, pool_direct, len);
+ if (unlikely(!tail_pkt)) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index b9c1cca..122ae8d 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2022-07-22 15:52 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 15:58 ` Huichao Cai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-07-22 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, konstantin.v.ananyev, Olivier Matz
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>
> > Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> > for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> > per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> > offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> > Add some test data for this API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
>
> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
>
> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is independent
> of the fast free optimization.
>
> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet documented.
This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an appropriate errno.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re:RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 15:52 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2022-07-22 15:58 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-22 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Morten Brørup
Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, konstantin.v.ananyev, Olivier Matz
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1406 bytes --]
At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
>> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
>> > for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
>> > per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
>> > offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
>> > Add some test data for this API.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
>>
>> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
>>
>> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is independent
>> of the fast free optimization.
>>
>> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
>
>Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet documented.
>
>This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an appropriate errno.
When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments when it is released.Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1985 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* RE: RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 15:58 ` Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-22 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 22:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-07-22 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, konstantin.v.ananyev, Olivier Matz
From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 17.59
> At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> >> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
> >>
> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
> >> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> >> > for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> >> > per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
> >> > offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
> >> > Add some test data for this API.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> >>
> >> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
> >>
> >> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is independent
> >> of the fast free optimization.
> >>
> >> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
> >
> >Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet documented.
> >
> >This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an appropriate errno.
>
> When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments when it is released. Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
Only if the bnxt driver also resets the segmentation fields (nb_segs and next) in those mbufs, which I suppose it does, if it supports MBUF_FAST_FREE with segmented packets.
However, other Ethernet drivers don't do that, so a generic library function cannot rely on it. These missing requirements for MBUF_FAST_FREE is a bug, either in the MBUF_FAST_FREE documentation, or in the drivers where MBUF_FAST_FREE only works correctly with direct and non-segmented mbufs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2022-07-22 22:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-23 8:24 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-07-22 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Morten Brørup, Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Olivier Matz
22/07/2022 17:14, Morten Brørup пишет:
> From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 17.59
>
>> At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
>>>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
>>>> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
>>>>> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
>>>>> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt = 1)
>>>>> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this API.
>>>>> Add some test data for this API.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
>>>>
>>>> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
>>>>
>>>> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is independent
>>>> of the fast free optimization.
>>>>
>>>> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
>>>
>>> Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet documented.
>>>
>>> This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an appropriate errno.
>>
>> When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments when it is released. Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
>
> Only if the bnxt driver also resets the segmentation fields (nb_segs and next) in those mbufs, which I suppose it does, if it supports MBUF_FAST_FREE with segmented packets.
>
> However, other Ethernet drivers don't do that, so a generic library function cannot rely on it. These missing requirements for MBUF_FAST_FREE is a bug, either in the MBUF_FAST_FREE documentation, or in the drivers where MBUF_FAST_FREE only works correctly with direct and non-segmented mbufs.
>
I believe multi-segment packets work ok with MBUF_FAST_FREE
(as long as other requirements are met).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 22:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-07-23 8:24 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-23 18:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-07-23 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ananyev, Huichao Cai
Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Olivier Matz, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing,
Matan Azrad, Viacheslav Ovsiienko
+CC: i40e maintainers
+CC: mlx5 maintainers
> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2022 00.35
>
> 22/07/2022 17:14, Morten Brørup пишет:
> > From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 17.59
> >
> >> At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
> >>>> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports
> optimization
> >>>>> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee
> that
> >>>>> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt =
> 1)
> >>>>> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this
> API.
> >>>>> Add some test data for this API.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
> >>>>
> >>>> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is
> independent
> >>>> of the fast free optimization.
> >>>>
> >>>> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
> >>>
> >>> Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs
> are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet
> documented.
> >>>
> >>> This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this
> patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an
> appropriate errno.
> >>
> >> When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments
> apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments when
> it is released. Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
> >
> > Only if the bnxt driver also resets the segmentation fields (nb_segs
> and next) in those mbufs, which I suppose it does, if it supports
> MBUF_FAST_FREE with segmented packets.
> >
> > However, other Ethernet drivers don't do that, so a generic library
> function cannot rely on it. These missing requirements for
> MBUF_FAST_FREE is a bug, either in the MBUF_FAST_FREE documentation, or
> in the drivers where MBUF_FAST_FREE only works correctly with direct
> and non-segmented mbufs.
> >
>
> I believe multi-segment packets work ok with MBUF_FAST_FREE
> (as long as other requirements are met).
Looking at the i40e and mlx5 drivers, they both seem to call rte_mempool_put_bulk() without first calling rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(). So segmented packets freed with MBUF_FAST_FREE, will be stored in the mbuf pool without m->nb_segs and m->next being reset first.
I don't have deep knowledge of these drivers, so maybe I have overlooked something.
The point of MBUF_FAST_FREE is to bypass a lot of code under certain conditions. So I believe that these two undocumented requirements should remain, so the drivers can bypass this code. Otherwise, don't use MBUF_FAST_FREE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-23 8:24 ` Morten Brørup
@ 2022-07-23 18:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-23 22:27 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-07-23 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Morten Brørup, Huichao Cai
Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Olivier Matz, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing,
Matan Azrad, Viacheslav Ovsiienko
23/07/2022 09:24, Morten Brørup пишет:
> +CC: i40e maintainers
> +CC: mlx5 maintainers
>
>> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru]
>> Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2022 00.35
>>
>> 22/07/2022 17:14, Morten Brørup пишет:
>>> From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 17.59
>>>
>>>> At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
>>>>>> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports
>> optimization
>>>>>>> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee
>> that
>>>>>>> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt =
>> 1)
>>>>>>> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this
>> API.
>>>>>>> Add some test data for this API.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is
>> independent
>>>>>> of the fast free optimization.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the mbufs
>> are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not yet
>> documented.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this
>> patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an
>> appropriate errno.
>>>>
>>>> When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments
>> apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments when
>> it is released. Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
>>>
>>> Only if the bnxt driver also resets the segmentation fields (nb_segs
>> and next) in those mbufs, which I suppose it does, if it supports
>> MBUF_FAST_FREE with segmented packets.
>>>
>>> However, other Ethernet drivers don't do that, so a generic library
>> function cannot rely on it. These missing requirements for
>> MBUF_FAST_FREE is a bug, either in the MBUF_FAST_FREE documentation, or
>> in the drivers where MBUF_FAST_FREE only works correctly with direct
>> and non-segmented mbufs.
>>>
>>
>> I believe multi-segment packets work ok with MBUF_FAST_FREE
>> (as long as other requirements are met).
>
> Looking at the i40e and mlx5 drivers, they both seem to call rte_mempool_put_bulk() without first calling rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(). So segmented packets freed with MBUF_FAST_FREE, will be stored in the mbuf pool without m->nb_segs and m->next being reset first.
>
> I don't have deep knowledge of these drivers, so maybe I have overlooked something.
>
> The point of MBUF_FAST_FREE is to bypass a lot of code under certain conditions. So I believe that these two undocumented requirements should remain, so the drivers can bypass this code. Otherwise, don't use MBUF_FAST_FREE.
>
Actually, after another look, I think you and Olivier are right -
multi-seg packets should not be used together with MBUF_FAST_FREE.
I forgot that mbuf_prefree() is responsible to reset both 'next'
and 'nb_segs' fields of the mbuf.
It might keep working for some simple forwarding app (like l3fwd),
as most PMDs reset these fields at RX path anyway, but that's just a
coincidence we shouldn't rely on.
We probably need to update l3fwd (and other examples) to dis-allow
MBUF_FAST_FREE when TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS is selected.
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v3] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-23 18:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-07-23 22:27 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2022-07-23 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ananyev, Huichao Cai
Cc: dev, Stephen Hemminger, Olivier Matz, Yuying Zhang, Beilei Xing,
Matan Azrad, Viacheslav Ovsiienko
> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2022 20.25
>
> 23/07/2022 09:24, Morten Brørup пишет:
> > +CC: i40e maintainers
> > +CC: mlx5 maintainers
> >
> >> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru]
> >> Sent: Saturday, 23 July 2022 00.35
> >>
> >> 22/07/2022 17:14, Morten Brørup пишет:
> >>> From: Huichao Cai [mailto:chcchc88@163.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 17.59
> >>>
> >>>> At 2022-07-22 23:52:28, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2022 16.49
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:01:50 +0800
> >>>>>> Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports
> >> optimization
> >>>>>>> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee
> >> that
> >>>>>>> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool and has refcnt
> =
> >> 1)
> >>>>>>> offload. In order to adapt to this offload function, add this
> >> API.
> >>>>>>> Add some test data for this API.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The code should just be checking that refcnt == 1 directly.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There are cases where sender passes a cloned mbuf. This is
> >> independent
> >>>>>> of the fast free optimization.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Similar to what Linux kernel does with skb_cow().
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Olivier just confirmed that MBUF_FAST_FREE requires that the
> mbufs
> >> are direct and non-segmented, although these requirements are not
> yet
> >> documented.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This means that you should not generate segmented mbufs with this
> >> patch. I don't know what to do instead; probably fail with an
> >> appropriate errno.
> >>>>
> >>>> When the bnxt driver sends mbuf, it will take the mbuf segments
> >> apart and hang it to the tx_buf_ring, so there is no mbuf segments
> when
> >> it is released. Does this mean that there can be mbuf segments?
> >>>
> >>> Only if the bnxt driver also resets the segmentation fields
> (nb_segs
> >> and next) in those mbufs, which I suppose it does, if it supports
> >> MBUF_FAST_FREE with segmented packets.
> >>>
> >>> However, other Ethernet drivers don't do that, so a generic library
> >> function cannot rely on it. These missing requirements for
> >> MBUF_FAST_FREE is a bug, either in the MBUF_FAST_FREE documentation,
> or
> >> in the drivers where MBUF_FAST_FREE only works correctly with direct
> >> and non-segmented mbufs.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I believe multi-segment packets work ok with MBUF_FAST_FREE
> >> (as long as other requirements are met).
> >
> > Looking at the i40e and mlx5 drivers, they both seem to call
> rte_mempool_put_bulk() without first calling rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg().
> So segmented packets freed with MBUF_FAST_FREE, will be stored in the
> mbuf pool without m->nb_segs and m->next being reset first.
> >
> > I don't have deep knowledge of these drivers, so maybe I have
> overlooked something.
> >
> > The point of MBUF_FAST_FREE is to bypass a lot of code under certain
> conditions. So I believe that these two undocumented requirements
> should remain, so the drivers can bypass this code. Otherwise, don't
> use MBUF_FAST_FREE.
> >
>
> Actually, after another look, I think you and Olivier are right -
> multi-seg packets should not be used together with MBUF_FAST_FREE.
> I forgot that mbuf_prefree() is responsible to reset both 'next'
> and 'nb_segs' fields of the mbuf.
> It might keep working for some simple forwarding app (like l3fwd),
> as most PMDs reset these fields at RX path anyway, but that's just a
> coincidence we shouldn't rely on.
I hope the PMDs don't reset these fields in their RX path, unless they are creating multi-seg packets and therefore must. It might cause an extra cache miss per packet, if the PMD unnecessarily sets m->next, which is in the second cache line of the mbuf.
Or perhaps everyone has forgotten about this RX/TX split of the first/second cache line of the mbufs, because all tests are based on run-to-completion, where the second cache line will be written shortly afterwards anyway. :-(
> We probably need to update l3fwd (and other examples) to dis-allow
> MBUF_FAST_FREE when TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS is selected.
+1
>
> Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH v4] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-24 4:50 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-24 8:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-24 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
add this API. Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 9 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 34 +++++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index ba0ffd0..88cc4cd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -418,10 +418,17 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(b,
+ pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size,
+ direct_pool);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..4a2b150 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,40 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index 27a8ad2..4009d26 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -259,3 +259,177 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate direct buffer */
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt->buf_len < frag_size)) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(out_pkt, char *,
+ out_pkt->data_len),
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(in_seg, char *,
+ in_seg_data_pos),
+ len);
+
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+ out_pkt->data_len += len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = out_pkt->data_len;
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index b9c1cca..8aad839 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-24 4:50 ` [PATCH v5] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-24 8:10 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-24 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
add this API. Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 9 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 34 +++++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index ba0ffd0..88cc4cd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -418,10 +418,17 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(b,
+ pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size,
+ direct_pool);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..4a2b150 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,40 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index 27a8ad2..e6ec408 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -259,3 +259,178 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate direct buffer */
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt->buf_len - rte_pktmbuf_headroom(out_pkt) <
+ frag_size)) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(out_pkt, char *,
+ out_pkt->data_len),
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(in_seg, char *,
+ in_seg_data_pos),
+ len);
+
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+ out_pkt->data_len += len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = out_pkt->data_len;
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index b9c1cca..8aad839 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-24 8:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-26 1:22 ` Huichao Cai
2022-08-07 11:45 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-08 1:48 ` [PATCH v7] " Huichao Cai
2 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2022-07-25 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, konstantin.v.ananyev
On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:10:03 +0800
Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * Formal parameter checking.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
> + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
> +
> + /* Check IP header length */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
My suspicions are all this input parameter checking probably costs more
than any performance gain of having a non-segmented fast path.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re:Re: [PATCH v6] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2022-07-26 1:22 ` Huichao Cai
2022-08-07 11:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-07-26 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev, konstantin.v.ananyev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]
At 2022-07-25 23:42:06, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:10:03 +0800
>Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Formal parameter checking.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
>> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
>> + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
>> + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
>> + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
>> +
>> + /* Check IP header length */
>> + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
>> + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
>My suspicions are all this input parameter checking probably costs more
>than any performance gain of having a non-segmented fast path.
These checks are consistent with the rte_ipv4_fragment_packet function.
I think these have been tested for performance.If these checks do affect performance,
perhaps the legitimacy of the variable is better guaranteed by the caller
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1791 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-24 8:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
@ 2022-08-07 11:45 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-08 1:48 ` [PATCH v7] " Huichao Cai
2 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-08-07 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai, dev
24/07/2022 09:10, Huichao Cai пишет:
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
> and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
> add this API. Add some test data for this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 9 +-
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 34 +++++++
> lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> index ba0ffd0..88cc4cd 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,17 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
> }
>
> if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
> - len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
> + if (i % 2)
> + len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
> tests[i].mtu_size,
> direct_pool,
> indirect_pool);
> + else
> + len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(b,
> + pkts_out,
> + BURST,
> + tests[i].mtu_size,
> + direct_pool);
> else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
> len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
> tests[i].mtu_size,
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> index 7d2abe1..4a2b150 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,40 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
>
> /**
> + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> + *
> + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
> + * non-segmented mbuf.
> + * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
> + * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
> + * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
> + * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
> + *
> + * @param pkt_in
> + * The input packet.
> + * @param pkts_out
> + * Array storing the output fragments.
> + * @param nb_pkts_out
> + * Number of fragments.
> + * @param mtu_size
> + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
> + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> + * @param pool_direct
> + * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
> + * @return
> + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> + * in the pkts_out array.
> + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int32_t
> +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> + uint16_t mtu_size,
> + struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
> +
> +/**
> * This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
> * Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index 27a8ad2..e6ec408 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -259,3 +259,178 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
>
> return out_pkt_pos;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
> + *
> + * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
> + * non-segmented mbuf.
> + * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
> + * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
> + * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
> + * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
> + *
> + * @param pkt_in
> + * The input packet.
> + * @param pkts_out
> + * Array storing the output fragments.
> + * @param nb_pkts_out
> + * Number of fragments.
> + * @param mtu_size
> + * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
> + * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
> + * @param pool_direct
> + * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
> + * @return
> + * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
> + * in the pkts_out array.
> + * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
> + */
> +int32_t
> +rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> + struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
> + uint16_t mtu_size,
> + struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
> +{
> + struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
> + uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
> + uint32_t more_in_segs;
> + uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
> + uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
> + uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
> + uint16_t ipopt_len;
> +
> + /*
> + * Formal parameter checking.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
> + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
> +
> + /* Check IP header length */
> + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
> + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
> + * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
> + */
> + frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
> + IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
> +
> + flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
> +
> + /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
> + if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
> + return -ENOTSUP;
> +
> + /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
> + if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
> + (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + in_seg = pkt_in;
> + in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
> + out_pkt_pos = 0;
> + fragment_offset = 0;
> +
> + ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
> + if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + more_in_segs = 1;
> + while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
> + uint32_t more_out_segs;
> + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
> +
> + /* Allocate direct buffer */
> + out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
> + if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
> + __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + if (unlikely(out_pkt->buf_len - rte_pktmbuf_headroom(out_pkt) <
> + frag_size)) {
As a nit, might be better;
if (rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(out_pkt) < frag_size) {...}
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
> + __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
> + out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
> + out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
> + frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
> +
> + more_out_segs = 1;
> + while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
> + uint32_t len;
> +
> + len = frag_bytes_remaining;
> + if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
> + len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
> +
> + memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(out_pkt, char *,
> + out_pkt->data_len),
> + rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(in_seg, char *,
> + in_seg_data_pos),
> + len);
> +
> + in_seg_data_pos += len;
> + frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
> + out_pkt->data_len += len;
> +
> + /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
> + if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
> + more_out_segs = 0;
> +
> + /* Current input segment done ? */
> + if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
> + in_seg = in_seg->next;
> + in_seg_data_pos = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
> + more_in_segs = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Build the IP header */
> +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len = out_pkt->data_len;
> + out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
> +
> + __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
> + (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
> + flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
> +
> + if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
> + ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
> + ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
> + ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
> + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> +
> + header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
> + in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
> + } else {
> + fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
> + out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
> + out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
> + }
> +
> + /* Write the fragment to the output list */
> + pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
> + out_pkt_pos++;
> + }
> +
> + return out_pkt_pos;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> index b9c1cca..8aad839 100644
> --- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> +++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
> @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> global:
>
> rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
> + rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet;
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-26 1:22 ` Huichao Cai
@ 2022-08-07 11:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-08-07 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai, Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev
>
> At 2022-07-25 23:42:06, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>>On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 16:10:03 +0800
>>Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Formal parameter checking.
>>> + */
>>> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
>>> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
>>> + unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
>>> + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
>>> + RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
>>> +
>>> + /* Check IP header length */
>>> + if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
>>> + unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>
>>My suspicions are all this input parameter checking probably costs more
> >than any performance gain of having a non-segmented fast path.
I think checks are not that expensive.
My guess - actual copying will be the main cycles eater here.
Though if percentage of packets that need to be fragmented is tiny,
might be it is still worth it.
Though yes, I still think better would be not to use MBUF_FAST_FREE at
all, but we are where we are.
> These checks are consistent with the rte_ipv4_fragment_packet function.
> I think these have been tested for performance.If these checks do affect
> performance,
> perhaps the legitimacy of the variable is better guaranteed by the caller
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v7] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-07-24 8:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-07 11:45 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-08-08 1:48 ` Huichao Cai
2022-08-08 22:29 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Huichao Cai @ 2022-08-08 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: konstantin.v.ananyev
Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
add this API. Add some test data for this API.
Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
---
app/test/test_ipfrag.c | 9 +-
lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h | 34 +++++++
lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/ip_frag/version.map | 1 +
4 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
index ba0ffd0..88cc4cd 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipfrag.c
@@ -418,10 +418,17 @@ static void ut_teardown(void)
}
if (tests[i].ipv == 4)
- len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
+ if (i % 2)
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
direct_pool,
indirect_pool);
+ else
+ len = rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(b,
+ pkts_out,
+ BURST,
+ tests[i].mtu_size,
+ direct_pool);
else if (tests[i].ipv == 6)
len = rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(b, pkts_out, BURST,
tests[i].mtu_size,
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
index 7d2abe1..4a2b150 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
@@ -179,6 +179,40 @@ int32_t rte_ipv4_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
struct rte_mempool *pool_indirect);
/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct);
+
+/**
* This function implements reassembly of fragmented IPv4 packets.
* Incoming mbufs should have its l2_len/l3_len fields setup correctly.
*
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
index 27a8ad2..ef5e1c5 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
@@ -259,3 +259,177 @@ static inline uint16_t __create_ipopt_frag_hdr(uint8_t *iph,
return out_pkt_pos;
}
+
+/**
+ * IPv4 fragmentation by copy.
+ *
+ * This function implements the fragmentation of IPv4 packets by copy
+ * non-segmented mbuf.
+ * This function is mainly used to adapt TX MBUF_FAST_FREE offload.
+ * MBUF_FAST_FREE: Device supports optimization for fast release of mbufs.
+ * When set application must guarantee that per-queue all mbufs comes from
+ * the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct and non-segmented.
+ *
+ * @param pkt_in
+ * The input packet.
+ * @param pkts_out
+ * Array storing the output fragments.
+ * @param nb_pkts_out
+ * Number of fragments.
+ * @param mtu_size
+ * Size in bytes of the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) for the outgoing IPv4
+ * datagrams. This value includes the size of the IPv4 header.
+ * @param pool_direct
+ * MBUF pool used for allocating direct buffers for the output fragments.
+ * @return
+ * Upon successful completion - number of output fragments placed
+ * in the pkts_out array.
+ * Otherwise - (-1) * errno.
+ */
+int32_t
+rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
+ struct rte_mbuf **pkts_out,
+ uint16_t nb_pkts_out,
+ uint16_t mtu_size,
+ struct rte_mempool *pool_direct)
+{
+ struct rte_mbuf *in_seg = NULL;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *in_hdr;
+ uint32_t out_pkt_pos, in_seg_data_pos;
+ uint32_t more_in_segs;
+ uint16_t fragment_offset, flag_offset, frag_size, header_len;
+ uint16_t frag_bytes_remaining;
+ uint8_t ipopt_frag_hdr[IPV4_HDR_MAX_LEN];
+ uint16_t ipopt_len;
+
+ /*
+ * Formal parameter checking.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) || unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt_in, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+ header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) *
+ RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER;
+
+ /* Check IP header length */
+ if (unlikely(pkt_in->data_len < header_len) ||
+ unlikely(mtu_size < header_len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments is aligned to a
+ * multiple of 8 bytes as per RFC791 section 2.3.
+ */
+ frag_size = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR((mtu_size - header_len),
+ IPV4_HDR_FO_ALIGN);
+
+ flag_offset = rte_cpu_to_be_16(in_hdr->fragment_offset);
+
+ /* If Don't Fragment flag is set */
+ if (unlikely((flag_offset & IPV4_HDR_DF_MASK) != 0))
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+
+ /* Check that pkts_out is big enough to hold all fragments */
+ if (unlikely(frag_size * nb_pkts_out <
+ (uint16_t)(pkt_in->pkt_len - header_len)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ in_seg = pkt_in;
+ in_seg_data_pos = header_len;
+ out_pkt_pos = 0;
+ fragment_offset = 0;
+
+ ipopt_len = header_len - sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr);
+ if (unlikely(ipopt_len > RTE_IPV4_HDR_OPT_MAX_LEN))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ more_in_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_in_segs)) {
+ struct rte_mbuf *out_pkt = NULL;
+ uint32_t more_out_segs;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *out_hdr;
+
+ /* Allocate direct buffer */
+ out_pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(pool_direct);
+ if (unlikely(out_pkt == NULL)) {
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(out_pkt) < frag_size)) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(out_pkt);
+ __free_fragments(pkts_out, out_pkt_pos);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Reserve space for the IP header that will be built later */
+ out_pkt->data_len = header_len;
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = header_len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining = frag_size;
+
+ more_out_segs = 1;
+ while (likely(more_out_segs && more_in_segs)) {
+ uint32_t len;
+
+ len = frag_bytes_remaining;
+ if (len > (in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos))
+ len = in_seg->data_len - in_seg_data_pos;
+
+ memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(out_pkt, char *,
+ out_pkt->data_len),
+ rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(in_seg, char *,
+ in_seg_data_pos),
+ len);
+
+ in_seg_data_pos += len;
+ frag_bytes_remaining -= len;
+ out_pkt->data_len += len;
+
+ /* Current output packet (i.e. fragment) done ? */
+ if (unlikely(frag_bytes_remaining == 0))
+ more_out_segs = 0;
+
+ /* Current input segment done ? */
+ if (unlikely(in_seg_data_pos == in_seg->data_len)) {
+ in_seg = in_seg->next;
+ in_seg_data_pos = 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(in_seg == NULL))
+ more_in_segs = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Build the IP header */
+
+ out_pkt->pkt_len = out_pkt->data_len;
+ out_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(out_pkt, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *);
+
+ __fill_ipv4hdr_frag(out_hdr, in_hdr, header_len,
+ (uint16_t)out_pkt->pkt_len,
+ flag_offset, fragment_offset, more_in_segs);
+
+ if (unlikely((fragment_offset == 0) && (ipopt_len) &&
+ ((flag_offset & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK) == 0))) {
+ ipopt_len = __create_ipopt_frag_hdr((uint8_t *)in_hdr,
+ ipopt_len, ipopt_frag_hdr);
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+
+ header_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr) + ipopt_len;
+ in_hdr = (struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)ipopt_frag_hdr;
+ } else {
+ fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
+ out_pkt->pkt_len - header_len);
+ out_pkt->l3_len = header_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Write the fragment to the output list */
+ pkts_out[out_pkt_pos] = out_pkt;
+ out_pkt_pos++;
+ }
+
+ return out_pkt_pos;
+}
diff --git a/lib/ip_frag/version.map b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
index b9c1cca..8aad839 100644
--- a/lib/ip_frag/version.map
+++ b/lib/ip_frag/version.map
@@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
global:
rte_ip_frag_table_del_expired_entries;
+ rte_ipv4_fragment_copy_nonseg_packet;
};
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v7] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-08-08 1:48 ` [PATCH v7] " Huichao Cai
@ 2022-08-08 22:29 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-29 14:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 26+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2022-08-08 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai, dev
08/08/2022 02:48, Huichao Cai пишет:
> Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
> and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
> add this API. Add some test data for this API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v7] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API
2022-08-08 22:29 ` Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2022-08-29 14:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2022-08-29 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huichao Cai; +Cc: dev, Konstantin Ananyev
09/08/2022 00:29, Konstantin Ananyev:
> 08/08/2022 02:48, Huichao Cai пишет:
> > Some NIC drivers support MBUF_FAST_FREE(Device supports optimization
> > for fast release of mbufs. When set application must guarantee that
> > per-queue all mbufs comes from the same mempool,has refcnt = 1,direct
> > and non-segmented.)offload. In order to adapt to this offload function,
> > add this API. Add some test data for this API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-29 14:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-09 2:39 [PATCH v1] ip_frag: add IPv4 fragment copy packet API Huichao Cai
2022-06-09 14:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-10 23:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-11 9:14 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-15 8:05 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-19 8:19 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-22 13:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 14:42 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-22 15:52 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 15:58 ` Huichao Cai
2022-07-22 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 22:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-23 8:24 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-23 18:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-23 22:27 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-22 14:49 ` [PATCH v4] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-24 4:50 ` [PATCH v5] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-24 8:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
2022-07-25 15:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-26 1:22 ` Huichao Cai
2022-08-07 11:49 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-07 11:45 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-08 1:48 ` [PATCH v7] " Huichao Cai
2022-08-08 22:29 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-29 14:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).