DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 00/11] ixgbe/mbuf: add TSO support
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:04:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509100431.7af69959@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399647038-15095-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

On Fri,  9 May 2014 16:50:27 +0200
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote:

> This series add TSO support in ixgbe DPDK driver. As discussed
> previously on the list [1], one problem is that there is not enough room
> in rte_mbuf today to store the required information to implement this
> feature:
>   - a new ol_flag
>   - the MSS
>   - the L4 header len
> 
> A solution would be to increase the size of the mbuf to 2 cache lines
> but it could have a bad impact on performance. This series proposes some
> rework to drastically reduce the size of the rte_mbuf structures before
> implementing the TSO, avoiding to change the mbuf size to 128 bytes.
> 
> After the rework of mbuf structures, the size of rte_mbuf structure is
> reduced by 9 bytes. The implementation of TSO requires to double the
> size of ol_flags (16 to 32 bits) and to double the size of offload
> information in order to add the mss and the l4 header length (32 to 64
> bits). At the end of the whole series, sizeof(rte_mbuf) is still 64
> bytes and 4 bytes are available for future use.
> 
> This rework causes a lot of modifications in the mbuf structure,
> implying some changes in the applications that directly use the mbuf
> structure fields instead of using the API functions (sometimes there is
> no function). That's why this series is a RFC. In my opinion, it's the
> proper moment for this evolution as the 1.7.0 window is open.
> 
> About TSO, the new fields in mbuf try to be generic enough to apply to
> other hardware in the future. To delegate the TCP segmentation to the
> hardware, the user has to:
> 
>   - set the PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag in mbuf->ol_flags (this flag implies
>     PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM and PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM)
>   - fill the mbuf->hw_offload information: l2_len, l3_len, l4_len, mss
>   - calculate the pseudo header checksum and set it in the TCP header,
>     as required when doing hardware TCP checksum offload
>   - set the IP checksum to 0
> 
> Compilation of DPDK and examples is tested for the following
> targets: x86_64-*-linuxapp-gcc, i686-*-linuxapp-gcc, x86_64-*-bsdapp-gcc
> 
> The mbuf rework series is validated with autotests:
> 
>   cd dpdk.org/
>   make install T=x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc
>   cd x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc/
>   modprobe uio
>   insmod kmod/igb_uio.ko
>   python ../tools/igb_uio_bind.py -b igb_uio 0000:02:00.0
>   echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
>   echo 1000 > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>   echo 1000 > /sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>   mount -t hugetlbfs none /mnt/huge
>   make test
> 
> TSO is validated with IPv4 and IPv6 with testpmd (see the commit log of
> last patch for details).
> 
> The performance non-regression has been tested with 6WINDGate fast path.
> 
> Note: this patches may conflict with patch [2] which is pushed yet, but
> will probably be integrated before this series.
> 
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-October/thread.html#572
> [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-April/002166.html
> 

I would also like to propose changing the checksum offload flags.
Many devices can indicate good checksum in some cases but can't test
for many other types of packets. By changing the flags to be:
 PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD and PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD

It is then possible to support devices where some cases (IPv4 + TCP)
are supported but others are not.

This also better aligns with Linux checksum code for cases where mbuf
and meta data are being passed into kernel.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-09 14:50 Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 01/11] igb/ixgbe: fix IP checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-05-15 10:40   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 02/11] mbuf: rename RTE_MBUF_SCATTER_GATHER into RTE_MBUF_REFCNT Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 03/11] mbuf: remove rte_ctrlmbuf Olivier Matz
2014-05-25 21:39   ` Gilmore, Walter E
2014-05-26 12:23     ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-26 16:40     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2014-05-26 22:43     ` Neil Horman
2014-05-27  0:17   ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-28  9:45     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 04/11] mbuf: remove the rte_pktmbuf structure Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 05/11] mbuf: merge physaddr and buf_len in a bitfield Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 15:39   ` Shaw, Jeffrey B
2014-05-09 16:06     ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-09 16:11       ` Shaw, Jeffrey B
2014-05-14 14:07         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-15  9:53           ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19  7:27         ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19  8:25           ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-05-19  9:30             ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-19  9:57               ` Richardson, Bruce
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 06/11] mbuf: replace data pointer by an offset Olivier Matz
2014-05-12 14:12   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-12 14:36     ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-12 14:41       ` Neil Horman
2014-05-12 15:07         ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 15:59           ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-12 16:13             ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 17:13               ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-13 13:29                 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-12 16:06           ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-12 18:39             ` Neil Horman
2014-05-13 13:54               ` Venkatesan, Venky
2014-05-13 14:09                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 07/11] mbuf: add functions to get the name of an ol_flag Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 08/11] mbuf: change ol_flags to 32 bits Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 09/11] mbuf: rename vlan_macip_len in hw_offload and increase its size Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 10/11] testpmd: modify source address to validate checksum calculation Olivier Matz
2014-05-09 14:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 11/11] ixgbe/mbuf: add TSO support Olivier Matz
2014-05-12 14:30   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-15 15:09   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-15 15:39     ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-15 16:30       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-16 12:11         ` Olivier MATZ
2014-05-16 17:01           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-05-19 12:32             ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-09 17:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2014-05-09 21:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC 00/11] " Olivier MATZ
2014-05-10  0:39     ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-19 12:47 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140509100431.7af69959@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).