* [dpdk-dev] i40e & ixgbe xmit issue: txe->next_id
@ 2016-03-03 19:17 Zhe Tao
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Zhe Tao @ 2016-03-03 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi all,
I have a question about why we need the txe->next_id field in the i40e&ixgbe Tx
function?
>From the current implementation, all the txe is initialized and free sequentially,
so we don't need this "next_id" field in our TX function, and when we decide the
"last_id" for txe, we assume the txe is sequential. So I suggest deprecate using
this next_id field.
Any comments will be welcome!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-03-04 3:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-03 19:17 [dpdk-dev] i40e & ixgbe xmit issue: txe->next_id Zhe Tao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).