From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, reshma.pattan@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH / RFC ] ethdev: Allow rte_eth_dev_configure with zero RX/TX queues
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:33:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160516113349.7d2a992f@miho> (raw)
This allows releasing RX/TX queue memory.
---
We're using DPDK 16.04 and have a test suite which performs a sequence
of separate tests of the type
allocate mempool
rte_eth_dev_configure(port, n_rxq, n_txq, ...)
setup rx/tx queues
rte_eth_dev_start(port)
<perform actual test>
stop rx/tx queues
rte_eth_dev_stop(port)
-> rte_eth_dev_configure(port, 0, 0, ...)
check that there are no leaks from the mempool
The crucial point is the marked line above. This is done so that the
rx_queue_release/tx_queue_release callbacks in the PMD is called, so
that mbufs allocated by the driver is released.
Without this patch, this explicitly isn't allowed. Is there a particular
reason why it shouldn't? It was introduced in
d505ba80a165a9735f3d9d3c6ab68a7bd85f271b
"ethdev: support unidirectional configuration"
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index a31018e..5481d45 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -944,11 +944,6 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
*/
(*dev->dev_ops->dev_infos_get)(dev, &dev_info);
- if (nb_rx_q == 0 && nb_tx_q == 0) {
- RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d both rx and tx queue cannot be 0\n", port_id);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
if (nb_rx_q > dev_info.max_rx_queues) {
RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d nb_rx_queues=%d > %d\n",
port_id, nb_rx_q, dev_info.max_rx_queues);
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 9:33 Simon Kagstrom [this message]
2016-05-16 10:24 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-05-16 10:32 ` Simon Kågström
2016-05-16 12:43 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-05-16 13:16 ` Simon Kågström
2016-05-20 6:29 ` Simon Kågström
2016-05-20 8:26 ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-06-23 15:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-20 23:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160516113349.7d2a992f@miho \
--to=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).