From: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] ring: change head and tail to pointer-width size
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:52:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190115235227.14013-2-gage.eads@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190115235227.14013-1-gage.eads@intel.com>
For 64-bit architectures, doubling the head and tail index widths greatly
increases the time it takes for them to wrap-around (with current CPU
speeds, it won't happen within the author's lifetime). This is important in
avoiding the ABA problem -- in which a thread mistakes reading the same
tail index in two accesses to mean that the ring was not modified in the
intervening time -- in the upcoming non-blocking ring implementation. Using
a 64-bit index makes the possibility of this occurring effectively zero.
I tested this commit's performance impact with an x86_64 build on a
dual-socket Xeon E5-2699 v4 using ring_perf_autotest, and the change made
no significant difference -- the few differences appear to be system noise.
(The test ran on isolcpus cores using a tickless scheduler, but some
variation was stll observed.) Each test was run three times and the results
were averaged:
| 64b head/tail cycle cost minus
Test | 32b head/tail cycle cost
------------------------------------------------------------------
SP/SC single enq/dequeue | 0.33
MP/MC single enq/dequeue | 0.00
SP/SC burst enq/dequeue (size 8) | 0.00
MP/MC burst enq/dequeue (size 8) | 1.00
SP/SC burst enq/dequeue (size 32) | 0.00
MP/MC burst enq/dequeue (size 32) | -1.00
SC empty dequeue | 0.01
MC empty dequeue | 0.00
Single lcore:
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | -0.36
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | 0.99
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -0.40
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -0.57
Two physical cores:
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | -0.49
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | 0.19
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -0.28
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -0.62
Two NUMA nodes:
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | 3.25
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 8) | 1.87
SP/SC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -0.44
MP/MC bulk enq/dequeue (size 32) | -1.10
An earlier version of this patch changed the head and tail indexes to
uint64_t, but that caused a performance drop on 32-bit builds. With
size_t, no performance difference is observed on an i686 build.
Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_ring.h | 6 +++---
lib/librte_ring/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_ring/meson.build | 2 +-
lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c | 10 +++++-----
lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h | 16 +++++++++-------
6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_ring.h b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_ring.h
index 827a3209e..da8886c08 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_ring.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_ring.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright(c) 2016-2017 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright(c) 2016-2019 Intel Corporation
*/
/**
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ rte_event_ring_enqueue_burst(struct rte_event_ring *r,
const struct rte_event *events,
unsigned int n, uint16_t *free_space)
{
- uint32_t prod_head, prod_next;
+ size_t prod_head, prod_next;
uint32_t free_entries;
n = __rte_ring_move_prod_head(&r->r, r->r.prod.single, n,
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ rte_event_ring_dequeue_burst(struct rte_event_ring *r,
struct rte_event *events,
unsigned int n, uint16_t *available)
{
- uint32_t cons_head, cons_next;
+ size_t cons_head, cons_next;
uint32_t entries;
n = __rte_ring_move_cons_head(&r->r, r->r.cons.single, n,
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/Makefile b/lib/librte_ring/Makefile
index 21a36770d..c106f9908 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/Makefile
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
EXPORT_MAP := rte_ring_version.map
-LIBABIVER := 2
+LIBABIVER := 3
# all source are stored in SRCS-y
SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RING) := rte_ring.c
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/meson.build b/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
index ab8b0b469..3603fdb7a 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
# Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation
-version = 2
+version = 3
sources = files('rte_ring.c')
headers = files('rte_ring.h',
'rte_ring_c11_mem.h',
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
index d215acecc..b15ee0eb3 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*
- * Copyright (c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (c) 2010-2019 Intel Corporation
* Copyright (c) 2007,2008 Kip Macy kmacy@freebsd.org
* All rights reserved.
* Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
@@ -227,10 +227,10 @@ rte_ring_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_ring *r)
fprintf(f, " flags=%x\n", r->flags);
fprintf(f, " size=%"PRIu32"\n", r->size);
fprintf(f, " capacity=%"PRIu32"\n", r->capacity);
- fprintf(f, " ct=%"PRIu32"\n", r->cons.tail);
- fprintf(f, " ch=%"PRIu32"\n", r->cons.head);
- fprintf(f, " pt=%"PRIu32"\n", r->prod.tail);
- fprintf(f, " ph=%"PRIu32"\n", r->prod.head);
+ fprintf(f, " ct=%"PRIuPTR"\n", r->cons.tail);
+ fprintf(f, " ch=%"PRIuPTR"\n", r->cons.head);
+ fprintf(f, " pt=%"PRIuPTR"\n", r->prod.tail);
+ fprintf(f, " ph=%"PRIuPTR"\n", r->prod.head);
fprintf(f, " used=%u\n", rte_ring_count(r));
fprintf(f, " avail=%u\n", rte_ring_free_count(r));
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
index af5444a9f..213c50708 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*
- * Copyright (c) 2010-2017 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (c) 2010-2019 Intel Corporation
* Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Kip Macy kmacy@freebsd.org
* All rights reserved.
* Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
@@ -63,11 +63,18 @@ enum rte_ring_queue_behavior {
struct rte_memzone; /* forward declaration, so as not to require memzone.h */
+/* Verify that size_t is the same as uintptr_t, which rte_ring (among other
+ * components) assumes.
+ */
+#if UINTPTR_MAX != SIZE_MAX
+#error "DPDK requires sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(uintptr_t)"
+#endif
+
/* structure to hold a pair of head/tail values and other metadata */
struct rte_ring_headtail {
- volatile uint32_t head; /**< Prod/consumer head. */
- volatile uint32_t tail; /**< Prod/consumer tail. */
- uint32_t single; /**< True if single prod/cons */
+ volatile size_t head; /**< Prod/consumer head. */
+ volatile size_t tail; /**< Prod/consumer tail. */
+ uint32_t single; /**< True if single prod/cons */
};
/**
@@ -242,7 +249,7 @@ void rte_ring_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_ring *r);
#define ENQUEUE_PTRS(r, ring_start, prod_head, obj_table, n, obj_type) do { \
unsigned int i; \
const uint32_t size = (r)->size; \
- uint32_t idx = prod_head & (r)->mask; \
+ size_t idx = prod_head & (r)->mask; \
obj_type *ring = (obj_type *)ring_start; \
if (likely(idx + n < size)) { \
for (i = 0; i < (n & ((~(unsigned)0x3))); i+=4, idx+=4) { \
@@ -272,7 +279,7 @@ void rte_ring_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_ring *r);
* single and multi consumer dequeue functions */
#define DEQUEUE_PTRS(r, ring_start, cons_head, obj_table, n, obj_type) do { \
unsigned int i; \
- uint32_t idx = cons_head & (r)->mask; \
+ size_t idx = cons_head & (r)->mask; \
const uint32_t size = (r)->size; \
obj_type *ring = (obj_type *)ring_start; \
if (likely(idx + n < size)) { \
@@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ __rte_ring_do_enqueue(struct rte_ring *r, void * const *obj_table,
unsigned int n, enum rte_ring_queue_behavior behavior,
unsigned int is_sp, unsigned int *free_space)
{
- uint32_t prod_head, prod_next;
+ size_t prod_head, prod_next;
uint32_t free_entries;
n = __rte_ring_move_prod_head(r, is_sp, n, behavior,
@@ -380,7 +387,7 @@ __rte_ring_do_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_table,
unsigned int n, enum rte_ring_queue_behavior behavior,
unsigned int is_sc, unsigned int *available)
{
- uint32_t cons_head, cons_next;
+ size_t cons_head, cons_next;
uint32_t entries;
n = __rte_ring_move_cons_head(r, (int)is_sc, n, behavior,
@@ -681,9 +688,9 @@ rte_ring_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p)
static inline unsigned
rte_ring_count(const struct rte_ring *r)
{
- uint32_t prod_tail = r->prod.tail;
- uint32_t cons_tail = r->cons.tail;
- uint32_t count = (prod_tail - cons_tail) & r->mask;
+ size_t prod_tail = r->prod.tail;
+ size_t cons_tail = r->cons.tail;
+ size_t count = (prod_tail - cons_tail) & r->mask;
return (count > r->capacity) ? r->capacity : count;
}
diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
index ea7dbe5b9..31e38adcc 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_generic.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*
- * Copyright (c) 2010-2017 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (c) 2010-2019 Intel Corporation
* Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Kip Macy kmacy@freebsd.org
* All rights reserved.
* Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#define _RTE_RING_GENERIC_H_
static __rte_always_inline void
-update_tail(struct rte_ring_headtail *ht, uint32_t old_val, uint32_t new_val,
+update_tail(struct rte_ring_headtail *ht, size_t old_val, size_t new_val,
uint32_t single, uint32_t enqueue)
{
if (enqueue)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ update_tail(struct rte_ring_headtail *ht, uint32_t old_val, uint32_t new_val,
static __rte_always_inline unsigned int
__rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sp,
unsigned int n, enum rte_ring_queue_behavior behavior,
- uint32_t *old_head, uint32_t *new_head,
+ size_t *old_head, size_t *new_head,
uint32_t *free_entries)
{
const uint32_t capacity = r->capacity;
@@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sp,
if (is_sp)
r->prod.head = *new_head, success = 1;
else
- success = rte_atomic32_cmpset(&r->prod.head,
+ /* Built-in used to handle variable-sized head index. */
+ success = __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&r->prod.head,
*old_head, *new_head);
} while (unlikely(success == 0));
return n;
@@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sp,
static __rte_always_inline unsigned int
__rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sc,
unsigned int n, enum rte_ring_queue_behavior behavior,
- uint32_t *old_head, uint32_t *new_head,
+ size_t *old_head, size_t *new_head,
uint32_t *entries)
{
unsigned int max = n;
@@ -161,8 +162,9 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sc,
if (is_sc)
r->cons.head = *new_head, success = 1;
else
- success = rte_atomic32_cmpset(&r->cons.head, *old_head,
- *new_head);
+ /* Built-in used to handle variable-sized head index. */
+ success = __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(&r->cons.head,
+ *old_head, *new_head);
} while (unlikely(success == 0));
return n;
}
--
2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-10 21:01 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Add non-blocking ring Gage Eads
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ring: change head and tail to pointer-width size Gage Eads
2019-01-11 4:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-11 19:07 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-11 10:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-01-11 19:12 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-11 19:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-15 15:48 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-11 10:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-01-11 10:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-01-11 11:30 ` Burakov, Anatoly
[not found] ` <20190111115851.GC3336@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
2019-01-11 19:27 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-21 14:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-01-22 18:27 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] ring: add a non-blocking implementation Gage Eads
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] test_ring: add non-blocking ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] test_ring_perf: add non-blocking ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] mempool/ring: add non-blocking ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-01-13 13:43 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-01-10 21:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] doc: add NB ring comment to EAL "known issues" Gage Eads
2019-01-11 2:51 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-11 19:30 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-14 0:07 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-01-15 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add non-blocking ring Gage Eads
2019-01-15 23:52 ` Gage Eads [this message]
2019-01-15 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] ring: add a non-blocking implementation Gage Eads
2019-01-15 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] test_ring: add non-blocking ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-01-15 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] test_ring_perf: add non-blocking ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-01-15 23:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] mempool/ring: add non-blocking ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-01-16 0:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add non-blocking ring Stephen Hemminger
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] ring: add 64-bit headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] ring: add a non-blocking implementation Gage Eads
2019-01-22 10:12 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-22 14:49 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-22 21:31 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-23 10:16 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-25 17:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-28 10:35 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 18:54 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-28 22:31 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 13:34 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-28 13:43 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 14:04 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-28 14:06 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 18:59 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] test_ring: add non-blocking ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] test_ring_perf: add non-blocking ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-01-18 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] mempool/ring: add non-blocking ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-01-22 9:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] Add non-blocking ring Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-22 10:15 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-22 19:15 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-23 16:02 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-23 16:29 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 13:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-01-25 5:20 ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-25 17:42 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-25 17:56 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-28 10:41 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Gage Eads
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] ring: add 64-bit headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-01-29 12:56 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-01-30 4:26 ` Eads, Gage
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] ring: add a non-blocking implementation Gage Eads
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] test_ring: add non-blocking ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] test_ring_perf: add non-blocking ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-01-28 18:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] mempool/ring: add non-blocking ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] Add lock-free ring and mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] ring: add a pointer-width headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] ring: add a ring start marker Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] ring: add a lock-free implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] test_ring: add lock-free ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] test_ring_perf: add lock-free ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 17:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] mempool/ring: add lock-free ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] Add lock-free ring and mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] ring: add a pointer-width headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] ring: add a ring start marker Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] ring: add a lock-free implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] test_ring: add lock-free ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] test_ring_perf: add lock-free ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-06 15:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] mempool/ring: add lock-free ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Add lock-free ring and mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] ring: add a pointer-width headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] ring: add a ring start marker Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] ring: add a lock-free implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-19 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] test_ring: add lock-free ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] test_ring_perf: add lock-free ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] mempool/ring: add lock-free ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:35 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-18 21:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] Add lock-free ring and mempool handler Eads, Gage
2019-03-18 21:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-19 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-19 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-01 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-02 10:16 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-04-02 10:16 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-04-04 22:28 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 22:28 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] ring: add a pointer-width headtail structure Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/6] ring: add a ring start marker Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/6] ring: add a lock-free implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/6] test_ring: add lock-free ring autotest Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/6] test_ring_perf: add lock-free ring perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/6] mempool/ring: add lock-free ring handlers Gage Eads
2019-03-19 1:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 16:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/6] Add lock-free ring and mempool handler Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 16:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190115235227.14013-2-gage.eads@intel.com \
--to=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).