DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function
@ 2019-10-11 12:14 Morten Brørup
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev,
	mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko,
	Morten Brørup

Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs.

Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs.

---

v8:
* Add unit test, covering both bulk alloc and bulk free.
v7:
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v6:
* Remove __rte_always_inline from static function.
  The compiler will inline anyway.
v5:
* Rename variables from "free" to "pending" for improved readability.
* Add prefix __ to rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Add array size parameter to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
  The compiler will optimize the parameter away anyway.
* Add description to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Minor description updates.
v4:
* Mark as experimental by adding __rte_experimental.
* Add function to experimental section of map file.
* Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer.
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v3:
* Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments.
* Add inline helper function, mainly for readability.
* Fix source code formatting regarding indentation.
v2:
* Function is not inline.
* Optimize to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in
  bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers
  in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer.
* Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but
  mismatches the original coding style of the modified files.
* Fix a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural.


Morten Brørup (2):
  mbuf: add bulk free function
  mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions

 app/test/test_mbuf.c                 | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c           |  66 +++++++++++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h           |  15 +++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map |   1 +
 4 files changed, 253 insertions(+)

-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mbuf: add bulk free function
  2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup
@ 2019-10-11 12:14 ` Morten Brørup
  2019-10-16  7:35   ` Olivier Matz
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev,
	mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko,
	Morten Brørup

Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs.

Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

---

v8:
* Add unit test, covering both bulk alloc and bulk free.
v7:
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v6:
* Remove __rte_always_inline from static function.
  The compiler will inline anyway.
v5:
* Rename variables from "free" to "pending" for improved readability.
* Add prefix __ to rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Add array size parameter to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
  The compiler will optimize the parameter away anyway.
* Add description to __rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array().
* Minor description updates.
v4:
* Mark as experimental by adding __rte_experimental.
* Add function to experimental section of map file.
* Fix source code formatting regarding pointer to pointer.
* Squash multiple modifications into one.
v3:
* Bugfix: Handle pakets with multiple segments.
* Add inline helper function, mainly for readability.
* Fix source code formatting regarding indentation.
v2:
* Function is not inline.
* Optimize to free multible mbufs belonging to the same mempool in
  bulk. Inspired by ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(), but allowing NULL pointers
  in the array, just like rte_pktmbuf_free() can take a NULL pointer.
* Use unsigned int instead of unsigned. Passes checkpatch, but
  mismatches the original coding style of the modified files.
* Fix a typo in the description headline: mempools is plural.
---
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c           | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h           | 15 +++++++
 lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map |  1 +
 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
index 37718d49c..854af1104 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
@@ -245,6 +245,72 @@ int rte_mbuf_check(const struct rte_mbuf *m, int is_header,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * @internal helper function for freeing a bulk of packet mbuf segments
+ * via an array holding the packet mbuf segments from the same mempool
+ * pending to be freed.
+ *
+ * @param m
+ *  The packet mbuf segment to be freed.
+ * @param pending
+ *  Pointer to the array of packet mbuf segments pending to be freed.
+ * @param nb_pending
+ *  Pointer to the number of elements held in the array.
+ * @param pending_sz
+ *  Number of elements the array can hold.
+ *  Note: The compiler should optimize this parameter away when using a
+ *  constant value, such as RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ.
+ */
+static void
+__rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(struct rte_mbuf *m,
+	struct rte_mbuf ** const pending, unsigned int * const nb_pending,
+	const unsigned int pending_sz)
+{
+	m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m);
+	if (likely(m != NULL)) {
+		if (*nb_pending == pending_sz ||
+		    (*nb_pending > 0 && m->pool != pending[0]->pool)) {
+			rte_mempool_put_bulk(pending[0]->pool,
+					(void **)pending, *nb_pending);
+			*nb_pending = 0;
+		}
+
+		pending[(*nb_pending)++] = m;
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Size of the array holding mbufs from the same membool pending to be freed
+ * in bulk.
+ */
+#define RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ 64
+
+/* Free a bulk of packet mbufs back into their original mempools. */
+void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count)
+{
+	struct rte_mbuf *m, *m_next, *pending[RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ];
+	unsigned int idx, nb_pending = 0;
+
+	for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
+		m = mbufs[idx];
+		if (unlikely(m == NULL))
+			continue;
+
+		__rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1);
+
+		do {
+			m_next = m->next;
+			__rte_pktmbuf_free_seg_via_array(m,
+					pending, &nb_pending,
+					RTE_PKTMBUF_FREE_PENDING_SZ);
+			m = m_next;
+		} while (m != NULL);
+	}
+
+	if (nb_pending > 0)
+		rte_mempool_put_bulk(pending[0]->pool, (void **)pending, nb_pending);
+}
+
 /* dump a mbuf on console */
 void
 rte_pktmbuf_dump(FILE *f, const struct rte_mbuf *m, unsigned dump_len)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
index 98225ec80..a02c8b12c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
@@ -1907,6 +1907,21 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * Free a bulk of packet mbufs back into their original mempools.
+ *
+ * Free a bulk of mbufs, and all their segments in case of chained buffers.
+ * Each segment is added back into its original mempool.
+ *
+ *  @param mbufs
+ *    Array of pointers to packet mbufs.
+ *    The array may contain NULL pointers.
+ *  @param count
+ *    Array size.
+ */
+__rte_experimental
+void rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned int count);
+
 /**
  * Creates a "clone" of the given packet mbuf.
  *
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
index 2662a37bf..cd6154ef2 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
@@ -50,4 +50,5 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
 	global:
 
 	rte_mbuf_check;
+	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk;
 } DPDK_18.08;
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions
  2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup
@ 2019-10-11 12:14 ` Morten Brørup
  2019-10-16  7:54   ` Olivier Matz
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2019-10-11 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: olivier.matz, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev,
	mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko,
	Morten Brørup

Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs.

Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
---
 app/test/test_mbuf.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
index 2a97afe20..fbce0ca7c 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <sys/queue.h>
 
 #include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_errno.h>
 #include <rte_debug.h>
 #include <rte_log.h>
 #include <rte_memory.h>
@@ -545,6 +546,170 @@ test_pktmbuf_pool(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * test bulk allocation and bulk free of mbufs
+ */
+static int
+test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk(void)
+{
+	struct rte_mempool *pool = NULL;
+	struct rte_mempool *pool2 = NULL;
+	unsigned int i;
+	struct rte_mbuf *m;
+	struct rte_mbuf *mbufs[NB_MBUF];
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	/* We cannot use the preallocated mbuf pools because their caches
+	 * prevent us from bulk allocating all objects in them.
+	 * So we create our own mbuf pools without caches.
+	 */
+	printf("Create mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n");
+	pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk",
+			NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+	if (pool == NULL) {
+		printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
+		       rte_errno);
+		goto err;
+	}
+	pool2 = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk2",
+			NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
+	if (pool2 == NULL) {
+		printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
+		       rte_errno);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	/* Preconditions: Mempools must be full. */
+	if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
+		printf("Test precondition failed: mempools not full\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+	if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == NB_MBUF &&
+			rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == NB_MBUF)) {
+		printf("Test precondition failed: mempools: %u+%u != %u+%u",
+		       rte_mempool_avail_count(pool),
+		       rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2),
+		       NB_MBUF, NB_MBUF);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	printf("Test single bulk alloc, followed by multiple bulk free.\n");
+
+	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
+	ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
+	if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
+		printf("mempool not empty\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Bulk free all mbufs, in four steps. */
+	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {
+		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
+		/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+		if (rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) != i + NB_MBUF / 4) {
+			printf("mempool avail count incorrect\n");
+			goto err;
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("Test multiple bulk alloc, followed by single bulk free.\n");
+
+	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in four steps. */
+	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {
+		ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, &mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
+		if (ret != 0) {
+			printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+			goto err;
+		}
+	}
+	/* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
+	if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
+		printf("mempool not empty\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Bulk free all mbufs, in one go. */
+	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+	/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+	if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
+		printf("mempool not full\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	printf("Test bulk free of single long chain.\n");
+
+	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
+	ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Create a long mbuf chain. */
+	for (i = 1; i < NB_MBUF; i++) {
+		ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[0], mbufs[i]);
+		if (ret != 0) {
+			printf("rte_pktmbuf_chain() failed: %d\n", ret);
+			goto err;
+		}
+		mbufs[i] = NULL;
+	}
+	/* Free the mbuf chain containing all the mbufs. */
+	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
+	/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
+	if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
+		printf("mempool not full\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	printf("Test bulk free of multiple chains using multiple pools.\n");
+
+	/* Create mbuf chains containing mbufs from different pools. */
+	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF * 2; i++) {
+		m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc((i & 4) ? pool2 : pool);
+		if (m == NULL) {
+			printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc() failed (%u)\n", i);
+			goto err;
+		}
+		if ((i % 16) == 0) {
+			mbufs[i / 16] = m;
+		} else {
+			rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[i / 16], m);
+		}
+	}
+	/* Test that both pools have been emptied. */
+	if (!(rte_mempool_empty(pool) && rte_mempool_empty(pool2))) {
+		printf("mempools not empty\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Free one mbuf chain. */
+	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
+	/* Test that the segments have been returned to the pools. */
+	if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == 8 &&
+			rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == 8)) {
+		printf("all segments of first mbuf have not been returned\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+	/* Free the remaining mbuf chains. */
+	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[1], NB_MBUF * 2 / 16 - 1);
+	/* Test that they have been returned to the pools. */
+	if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
+		printf("mempools not full\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	rte_mempool_free(pool);
+	rte_mempool_free(pool2);
+	return 0;
+
+err:
+	rte_mempool_free(pool);
+	rte_mempool_free(pool2);
+	return -1;
+}
+
 /*
  * test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly
  */
@@ -1162,6 +1327,12 @@ test_mbuf(void)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	/* test bulk mbuf alloc and free */
+	if (test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() < 0) {
+		printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() failed\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	/* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */
 	if (test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr(pktmbuf_pool) < 0) {
 		printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr() failed\n");
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] mbuf: add bulk free function
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup
@ 2019-10-16  7:35   ` Olivier Matz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Matz @ 2019-10-16  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup
  Cc: dev, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev,
	mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14:57PM +0000, Morten Brørup wrote:
> Add function for freeing a bulk of mbufs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

[...]

> +/**
> + * Size of the array holding mbufs from the same membool pending to be freed
> + * in bulk.
> + */

Minor typo: membool -> mempool

Apart from that,
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions
  2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup
@ 2019-10-16  7:54   ` Olivier Matz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Matz @ 2019-10-16  7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Morten Brørup
  Cc: dev, stephen, harry.van.haaren, konstantin.ananyev,
	mattias.ronnblom, bruce.richardson, arybchenko

Hi Morten,

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:14:58PM +0000, Morten Brørup wrote:
> Add unit test for functions for allocating and freeing a bulk of mbufs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>

Few minor comments below. You can add my ack in the next version.

> ---
>  app/test/test_mbuf.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 171 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> index 2a97afe20..fbce0ca7c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <sys/queue.h>
>  
>  #include <rte_common.h>
> +#include <rte_errno.h>
>  #include <rte_debug.h>
>  #include <rte_log.h>
>  #include <rte_memory.h>
> @@ -545,6 +546,170 @@ test_pktmbuf_pool(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * test bulk allocation and bulk free of mbufs
> + */
> +static int
> +test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mempool *pool = NULL;
> +	struct rte_mempool *pool2 = NULL;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *m;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *mbufs[NB_MBUF];
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* We cannot use the preallocated mbuf pools because their caches
> +	 * prevent us from bulk allocating all objects in them.
> +	 * So we create our own mbuf pools without caches.
> +	 */
> +	printf("Create mbuf pools for bulk allocation.\n");
> +	pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk",
> +			NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
> +	if (pool == NULL) {
> +		printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
> +		       rte_errno);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	pool2 = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("test_pktmbuf_bulk2",
> +			NB_MBUF, 0, 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, SOCKET_ID_ANY);
> +	if (pool2 == NULL) {
> +		printf("rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() failed. rte_errno %d\n",
> +		       rte_errno);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Preconditions: Mempools must be full. */
> +	if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
> +		printf("Test precondition failed: mempools not full\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == NB_MBUF &&
> +			rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == NB_MBUF)) {
> +		printf("Test precondition failed: mempools: %u+%u != %u+%u",
> +		       rte_mempool_avail_count(pool),
> +		       rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2),
> +		       NB_MBUF, NB_MBUF);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Test single bulk alloc, followed by multiple bulk free.\n");
> +
> +	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
> +	ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
> +	if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
> +		printf("mempool not empty\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Bulk free all mbufs, in four steps. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {

Maybe add a RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % 4 == 0)

> +		rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
> +		/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
> +		if (rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) != i + NB_MBUF / 4) {
> +			printf("mempool avail count incorrect\n");
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Test multiple bulk alloc, followed by single bulk free.\n");
> +
> +	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in four steps. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF; i += NB_MBUF / 4) {
> +		ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, &mbufs[i], NB_MBUF / 4);
> +		if (ret != 0) {
> +			printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/* Test that they have been removed from the pool. */
> +	if (!rte_mempool_empty(pool)) {
> +		printf("mempool not empty\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Bulk free all mbufs, in one go. */
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, NB_MBUF);
> +	/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
> +	if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
> +		printf("mempool not full\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Test bulk free of single long chain.\n");
> +
> +	/* Bulk allocate all mbufs in the pool, in one go. */
> +	ret = rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(pool, mbufs, NB_MBUF);
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Create a long mbuf chain. */
> +	for (i = 1; i < NB_MBUF; i++) {
> +		ret = rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[0], mbufs[i]);
> +		if (ret != 0) {
> +			printf("rte_pktmbuf_chain() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		mbufs[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +	/* Free the mbuf chain containing all the mbufs. */
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
> +	/* Test that they have been returned to the pool. */
> +	if (!rte_mempool_full(pool)) {
> +		printf("mempool not full\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("Test bulk free of multiple chains using multiple pools.\n");
> +
> +	/* Create mbuf chains containing mbufs from different pools. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < NB_MBUF * 2; i++) {
> +		m = rte_pktmbuf_alloc((i & 4) ? pool2 : pool);
> +		if (m == NULL) {
> +			printf("rte_pktmbuf_alloc() failed (%u)\n", i);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		if ((i % 16) == 0) {
> +			mbufs[i / 16] = m;
> +		} else {
> +			rte_pktmbuf_chain(mbufs[i / 16], m);
> +		}
> +	}

The 16 could be a #define CHAIN_LEN.

Maybe another bug_on:
RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(NB_MBUF % (CHAIN_LEN / 2) == 0)


> +	/* Test that both pools have been emptied. */
> +	if (!(rte_mempool_empty(pool) && rte_mempool_empty(pool2))) {
> +		printf("mempools not empty\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Free one mbuf chain. */
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbufs, 1);
> +	/* Test that the segments have been returned to the pools. */
> +	if (!(rte_mempool_avail_count(pool) == 8 &&
> +			rte_mempool_avail_count(pool2) == 8)) {
> +		printf("all segments of first mbuf have not been returned\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	/* Free the remaining mbuf chains. */
> +	rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(&mbufs[1], NB_MBUF * 2 / 16 - 1);
> +	/* Test that they have been returned to the pools. */
> +	if (!(rte_mempool_full(pool) && rte_mempool_full(pool2))) {
> +		printf("mempools not full\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}

Use CHAIN_LEN in the code above.

> +
> +	rte_mempool_free(pool);
> +	rte_mempool_free(pool2);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	rte_mempool_free(pool);
> +	rte_mempool_free(pool2);
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly
>   */
> @@ -1162,6 +1327,12 @@ test_mbuf(void)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* test bulk mbuf alloc and free */
> +	if (test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() < 0) {
> +		printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_bulk() failed\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* test that the pointer to the data on a packet mbuf is set properly */
>  	if (test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr(pktmbuf_pool) < 0) {
>  		printf("test_pktmbuf_pool_ptr() failed\n");
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Thanks!
Olivier

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-16  7:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-11 12:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] mbuf: add bulk free function Morten Brørup
2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] " Morten Brørup
2019-10-16  7:35   ` Olivier Matz
2019-10-11 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] mbuf: add unit test for bulk alloc/free functions Morten Brørup
2019-10-16  7:54   ` Olivier Matz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).