DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	dev@dpdk.org, pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: remove register from function parameter in headers
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:04:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511090438.GB1957@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a08b2690-7a7e-7212-6353-13a785eb636c@intel.com>

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:56:10AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 09-May-20 12:25 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Compiling a C++ application that includes directly or indirectly
> > rte_common.h will cause a warning:
> > 
> > include/rte_common.h:350:37: warning: ISO C++17 does not allow ‘register’ storage class specifier [-Wregister]
> >   rte_combine32ms1b(register uint32_t x)
> > 
> > C++ pickier than standard C and flags this antique usage.
> > 
> > This is a bugfix please apply to 20.05.
> > The register keyword is an old K&R legacy and should be removed
> > everywhere in DPDK. For now, fix it where it hurts.
> > Checkpatch should also be able to flag use of register keyword.
> > 
> > Fixes: 08f683174e94 ("eal: add functions for previous power of 2 alignment")
> > Cc: pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> 
> I remember similar patches already being submitted, and the community has
> decided that 'register' keyword was worth keeping (although i don't recall
> the reasoning). Has something changed since then?
> 
I'm not sure anything has changed - and I don't see the need for register
keyword myself - but all headers must be includable in C++ code. Therefore
we need to remove register from rte_common.h

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-11  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08 23:25 Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-11  8:56 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-11  9:04   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2020-05-18 16:30     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200511090438.GB1957@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).