DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/1] distributor test fix
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 04:59:09 +0100
Message-ID: <20210119035910.8324-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CGME20210119035920eucas1p15da5a04b73d19e63287dc14905d765f2@eucas1p1.samsung.com>

According to the discussion in this thread:

I was able to reproduce the distributor test failure in the exactly same
way as described, but on x86_64 machine with 32 cores.
So it does not seem to be the problem related to the ARM architecture.
IMO issue occurs when there are many worker threads returning at the same
time packets.

I was not able to observe the issue on ARM devices, but I used only
machines with 4 cores. So that is max 3 worker cores,
so maximum of 32*3 = 96 packets processed at the same time
which is less than 127 , so the issue cannot occur.

Can anyone verify this patch on a machine similar to one used in CI lab,
on which the issue occurred?

Lukasz Wojciechowski (1):
  test/distributor: prevent return buffer overload

 app/test/test_distributor.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


       reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20210119035920eucas1p15da5a04b73d19e63287dc14905d765f2@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-19  3:59 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CGME20210119035921eucas1p1aaea0d68975ba9481f200912eb10a40e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-19  3:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/1] test/distributor: prevent return buffer overload Lukasz Wojciechowski
2021-01-28 14:10       ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2021-01-29  8:03         ` David Marchand
2021-01-29 12:36           ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2021-01-28 16:46       ` [dpdk-dev] " David Hunt
2021-01-19  8:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/1] distributor test fix David Marchand
2021-01-19 13:06     ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2021-01-28 13:34       ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119035910.8324-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
    --to=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git