DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: standard c++ forbids defining the keyword asm as a macro
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:16:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210417011605.GA13677@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3365684.9AJlD7vKmA@thomas>

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:35:53PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/03/2021 05:26, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_common.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/include/rte_common.h
> > @@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ extern "C" {
> >  #define typeof __typeof__
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +#ifndef __cplusplus
> >  #ifndef asm
> >  #define asm __asm__
> >  #endif
> > +#endif
> 
> Applied with this explanation:
> 
>     eal: do not redefine asm keyword in C++
>     
>     C++ forbids redefining a keyword as a macro.
>     The keyword asm is conditionally-supported and implementation defined,
>     but it seems our best guess.
>     
>     In C, if asm does not exist, it is defined as __asm__
>     which is a GNU extension.
> 
> 
> One more question:

> Can we have a similar issue with typeof?
> I guess it works because typeof is not a keyword?

typeof isn't a keyword though don't fully understand the benefit of
#define typeof __typeof__ since it just pollutes the application
namespace. extensions and intrinsics generally should stay in the
namespace reserved for use by the compiler `__'.

i would say we will have a similar issue with any keyword defined in the
c++ standard if we are defining any of them.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-17  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24  4:26 Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24  8:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 16:45   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 17:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 17:28       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 17:52         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-24 19:52           ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-24 21:58             ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 21:55           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-24 22:41             ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-03-25  0:09               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-03-25  8:00                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-25 18:50                   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2021-04-13 13:10                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13 13:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-17  1:16   ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210417011605.GA13677@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).