DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix comments of packet integrity flow item
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 18:27:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210519162725.2179226-1-thomas@monjalon.net> (raw)

The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
but the markers were /**< instead of /**

Fixes: b10a421a1f3b ("ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules")

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
index 94c8c1ccc8..d7e0082dc7 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
@@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ rte_flow_item_geneve_opt_mask = {
 #endif
 
 struct rte_flow_item_integrity {
-	/**< Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to.
+	/** Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to.
 	 * @see rte_flow_action_rss
 	 */
 	uint32_t level;
@@ -1716,21 +1716,21 @@ struct rte_flow_item_integrity {
 	union {
 		__extension__
 		struct {
-			/**< The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */
+			/** The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */
 			uint64_t packet_ok:1;
-			/**< L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
+			/** L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
 			uint64_t l2_ok:1;
-			/**< L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
+			/** L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
 			uint64_t l3_ok:1;
-			/**< L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
+			/** L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
 			uint64_t l4_ok:1;
-			/**< L2 layer CRC is valid. */
+			/** L2 layer CRC is valid. */
 			uint64_t l2_crc_ok:1;
-			/**< IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */
+			/** IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */
 			uint64_t ipv4_csum_ok:1;
-			/**< L4 layer checksum is valid. */
+			/** L4 layer checksum is valid. */
 			uint64_t l4_csum_ok:1;
-			/**< The l3 length is smaller than the frame length. */
+			/** L3 length is smaller than frame length. */
 			uint64_t l3_len_ok:1;
 			uint64_t reserved:56;
 		};
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 16:27 Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-05-19 16:30 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-05-19 16:31   ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-05-19 16:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 17:23   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-19 17:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-19 17:47   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 17:59     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-19 18:02       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 20:35     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210519162725.2179226-1-thomas@monjalon.net \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).