DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Kulasek, TomaszX" <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: fix the way how L4 checksum choice is tested
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:52:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801689E3F22@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190529173337.31157-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>


> The API to prepare checksum offloads mistreats L4
> checksum type enum values as self-contained flags.
> 
> Turning these flag checks into enum checks causes
> warnings by GCC about possibly uninitialised IPv4
> header pointer. The issue was found to show up in
> the case of GCC versions 4.8.5 and 5.4.0, however,
> it might be the case for a wider variety of other
> versions. As GCC version 7.4.0 is not susceptible
> to the said false positive assessment, this patch
> maintains a compiler barrier for earlier versions.
> 
> Fixes: 4fb7e803eb1a ("ethdev: add Tx preparation")
> Cc: Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
> ---
>  lib/librte_net/rte_net.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> index 7088584..fb09431 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_net.h
> @@ -151,7 +151,19 @@ uint32_t rte_net_get_ptype(const struct rte_mbuf *m,
>  			ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
>  	}
> 

As I remember, saw something similar before...
Probably the eaiser way to overcome it, is just to always initialize ipv4_hdr above,
something like:

+ipv4_hdr = NULL;
if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_IPV4) {
                ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
                                inner_l3_offset);

                if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM)
                        ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
 }


> -	if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM) {
> +#ifdef GCC_VERSION
> +#if GCC_VERSION < 70400
> +	/*
> +	 * Earlier versions of GCC suspect access to possibly
> +	 * uninitialised ipv4_hdr in the code below, although
> +	 * the said variable is properly initialised above.
> +	 * Use compiler barrier to cope with the problem.
> +	 */
> +	rte_compiler_barrier();
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> +	if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM) {
>  		if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_IPV4) {
>  			udp_hdr = (struct rte_udp_hdr *)((char *)ipv4_hdr +
>  					m->l3_len);
> @@ -167,7 +179,7 @@ uint32_t rte_net_get_ptype(const struct rte_mbuf *m,
>  			udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = rte_ipv6_phdr_cksum(ipv6_hdr,
>  					ol_flags);
>  		}
> -	} else if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM) ||
> +	} else if ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_L4_MASK) == PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM ||
>  			(ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)) {
>  		if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_IPV4) {
>  			/* non-TSO tcp or TSO */
> --
> 1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29 17:33 Ivan Malov
2019-06-24 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-06-24 12:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-06-24 12:16   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-06-27 13:26     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-06-27 21:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ivan Malov
2019-06-28  0:10   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-28  3:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ivan Malov
2019-06-28  4:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-06-28 10:47   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-06-28 16:24     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801689E3F22@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).