DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	"Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	"Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Byrne, Stephen1" <stephen1.byrne@intel.com>,
	"Tamboli, Amit S" <amit.tamboli@intel.com>,
	"Padubidri, Sanjay A" <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>,
	 "Patel, Amol" <amol.patel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:06:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D328CD4@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x8ttTPOsAtTvxhb8JBpj3ZmeqBke8crea7xf3UQGKCXA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi David,

Thanks for the inputs, these are useful. Let me work on these and share v5 ASAP.

Thanks
Vipin Varghese

From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 12:35 PM
To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan@intel.com>; Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Byrne, Stephen1 <stephen1.byrne@intel.com>; Tamboli, Amit S <amit.tamboli@intel.com>; Padubidri, Sanjay A <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>; Patel, Amol <amol.patel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture


On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:33 AM Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@intel.com<mailto:vipin.varghese@intel.com>> wrote:
Add option --multi, to enhance the pdump application to allow capture
on unique cores for each --pdump option. If option --multi is ignored
the default capture occurs on a single core for all --pdump options.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@intel.com<mailto:vipin.varghese@intel.com>>
---
 app/pdump/main.c           | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 doc/guides/tools/pdump.rst |  8 +++-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/pdump/main.c b/app/pdump/main.c
index c1db2eb8d..997c8942f 100644
--- a/app/pdump/main.c
+++ b/app/pdump/main.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <rte_pdump.h>

 #define CMD_LINE_OPT_PDUMP "pdump"
+#define CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI "multi"
 #define PDUMP_PORT_ARG "port"
 #define PDUMP_PCI_ARG "device_id"
 #define PDUMP_QUEUE_ARG "queue"
@@ -139,12 +140,14 @@ struct parse_val {
 static int num_tuples;
 static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf_default;
 static volatile uint8_t quit_signal;
+static uint8_t multiple_core_capture;

 /**< display usage */
 static void
 pdump_usage(const char *prgname)
 {
-       printf("usage: %s [EAL options] -- --pdump "
+       printf("usage: %s [EAL options] -- [--multi] "
+                       "--pdump "
                        "'(port=<port id> | device_id=<pci id or vdev name>),"
                        "(queue=<queue_id>),"
                        "(rx-dev=<iface or pcap file> |"

Rather than hardcode the usage, reuse the macro you introduced: CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI.


@@ -376,6 +379,7 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char **argv, char *prgname)
        int option_index;
        static struct option long_option[] = {
                {"pdump", 1, 0, 0},
+               {"multi", 0, 0, 0},
                {NULL, 0, 0, 0}
        };

Idem reuse the macro.

Besides look at lib/librte_eal/common/eal_options.h and lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c.
Define an enum for long only options and map "multi" to an integer that has no printable character associated.

This way, you can avoid (see below)...

@@ -395,6 +399,10 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char **argv, char *prgname)
                                        pdump_usage(prgname);
                                        return -1;
                                }
+                       } else if (!strncmp(long_option[option_index].name,
+                                       CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI,
+                                       sizeof(CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI))) {
+                               multiple_core_capture = 1;
                        }
                        break;
                default:

... this strncmp.
getopt_long already matched the input option for you.


--
David Marchand

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-28  6:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28  6:00 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57   ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04     ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:34     ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-28 15:34       ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-29 10:08     ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:08       ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:22       ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:22         ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:52         ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:52           ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 17:03         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-29 17:03           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01  4:05           ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-01  4:05             ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02  4:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33         ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33         ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  7:05         ` David Marchand
2019-04-02  7:05           ` David Marchand
2019-04-02  8:06           ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2019-04-02  8:06             ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02  9:18         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18             ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18             ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 10:01             ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 10:01               ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 15:30               ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02 15:30                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04  7:39                 ` David Marchand
2019-04-04  7:39                   ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 16:13             ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-02 16:13               ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-03  3:53               ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-03  3:53                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-05 17:10                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:10                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08  3:03                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08  3:03                     ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04  8:55             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55               ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55                 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-09  9:04                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09  9:04                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-04  8:55               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55                 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-05 17:09                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:09                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08  3:01                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08  3:01                     ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-09  9:05                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09  9:05                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-22 19:49               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-22 19:49                 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D328CD4@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
    --cc=amit.tamboli@intel.com \
    --cc=amol.patel@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=sanjay.padubidri@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen1.byrne@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).