DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	"Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	"Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Byrne, Stephen1" <stephen1.byrne@intel.com>,
	"Tamboli, Amit S" <amit.tamboli@intel.com>,
	"Padubidri, Sanjay A" <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>,
	 "Patel, Amol" <amol.patel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:30:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D328FFD@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190402153024.AC1m2Giwv4OYCDUA5lXVTgMDbTEme2ZKAgaGZ6GfhfY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wkP_9o0yrGHbxvYGMThiUqVFTNdOV1p6GW9mS=osd1zQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi David,

snipped
 #define CMD_LINE_OPT_PDUMP "pdump"
+#define CMD_LINE_OPT_PDUMP_NUM 1
+#define CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI "multi"
+#define CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI_NUM 2
 #define PDUMP_PORT_ARG "port"
 #define PDUMP_PCI_ARG "device_id"
 #define PDUMP_QUEUE_ARG "queue"

You'd better map to integers that do not collide with ascii characters (even if non printable).
So values >= 256 are better.
This is the reason for the comment here:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_options.h#n19

In case of dpdk-pdump; there are 2 options ‘multi’ and ‘pdump’. But in case of eal_option there are multiple options which has same fist character. Hence the comment 'first long only option value must be >= 256, so that we won't conflict with short options' is true.

In my humble opinion, I think it need not change. But please let me know otherwise.
Snipped
+       printf("usage: %s [EAL options] -- [--%s] "
+                       "--%s "
                        "'(port=<port id> | device_id=<pci id or vdev name>),"
                        "(queue=<queue_id>),"
                        "(rx-dev=<iface or pcap file> |"
@@ -152,7 +157,7 @@ pdump_usage(const char *prgname)
                        "[ring-size=<ring size>default:16384],"
                        "[mbuf-size=<mbuf data size>default:2176],"
                        "[total-num-mbufs=<number of mbufs>default:65535]'\n",
-                       prgname);
+                       prgname, CMD_LINE_OPT_MULTI, CMD_LINE_OPT_PDUMP);
 }

 static int

You can concatenate the macro.

Thank you for the suggestion,

#define OPT(X) #X
#define STR_REPLACE "\n[--"OPT(multi)"]\n --"OPT(pdump)

prgname, STR_REPLACE);

should we change to this or skip this as we are using this once?

snipped

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-28  6:00 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28  6:00 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 14:57   ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:04     ` Vipin Varghese
2019-03-28 15:34     ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-28 15:34       ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-29 10:08     ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:08       ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:22       ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:22         ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-03-29 10:52         ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 10:52           ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-03-29 17:03         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-29 17:03           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-01  4:05           ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-01  4:05             ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02  4:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33         ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  4:33         ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  7:05         ` David Marchand
2019-04-02  7:05           ` David Marchand
2019-04-02  8:06           ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02  8:06             ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-02  9:18         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18             ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02  9:18             ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-02 10:01             ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 10:01               ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 15:30               ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2019-04-02 15:30                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04  7:39                 ` David Marchand
2019-04-04  7:39                   ` David Marchand
2019-04-02 16:13             ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-02 16:13               ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-03  3:53               ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-03  3:53                 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-05 17:10                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:10                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08  3:03                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08  3:03                     ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-04  8:55             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55               ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] app/pdump: remove core restriction Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55                 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-09  9:04                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09  9:04                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-04  8:55               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/pdump: enhance to support multi-core capture Vipin Varghese
2019-04-04  8:55                 ` Vipin Varghese
2019-04-05 17:09                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-05 17:09                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-08  3:01                   ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-08  3:01                     ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-04-09  9:05                 ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-09  9:05                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2019-04-22 19:49               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] app/pdump: enhance to support unique cores Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-22 19:49                 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D328FFD@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
    --cc=amit.tamboli@intel.com \
    --cc=amol.patel@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=sanjay.padubidri@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen1.byrne@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).