DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Qiu, Michael" <michael.qiu@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Mata, Jhoanna E" <jhoanna.e.mata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Reduce DPDK initialization time
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:34:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028622F002AE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447817231-10510-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>

On 11/18/2015 6:30 PM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> This RFC patch aims to reduce DPDK initialization time, which is important in cases such as micro service.
>
> Changes are:
>
> 1. Reduce timer initialization time
>
> 2. Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling operations
>
> With this patch:
>
> 1. Timer initialization time can be reduced by 4/10 second
>
> 2. Memory initialization time can be reduced nearly by half
>
> The 2nd topic has been brought up before in this thread:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4219/
>
> Zhihong Wang (2):
>   lib/librte_eal: Reduce timer initialization time
>   lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling
>
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 5 +----
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_timer.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>

As I tested with 8192 hugepages(size 2M), one nic 82599 bind, using time
to get the seconds used:
with this patch:

echo quit | time ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c 0x3 -n 4 -- -i
2.15 user
5.55 system
0:07.82 elapsed

Without patch:
echo quit | time ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c 0x3 -n 4 -- -i
3.18 user
5.63 system
0:09.32 elapsed

1.5s saved,  16% improvement, I don't know if this is good enough, but
indeed save lots of time.

Thanks,
Michael

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-24  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  3:27 Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18  3:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] lib/librte_eal: Reduce timer " Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18  3:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib/librte_eal: Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling Zhihong Wang
2015-11-18 10:39   ` Mcnamara, John
2015-11-18 10:44     ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-18 12:07       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-18 16:00         ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-18 16:13           ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-11-18 19:09             ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-19  2:15               ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-19  6:04                 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-19  6:32                   ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-19  9:18                     ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-23  2:54                     ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23 10:18                       ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-20 12:15               ` Bruce Richardson
2015-11-19  3:54         ` Wang, Zhihong
2015-11-19  6:09           ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-19  9:14         ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-23  3:46           ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23  4:07             ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-23  5:05               ` Xie, Huawei
2015-11-23  6:52                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-25 18:24                   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-24  8:34 ` Qiu, Michael [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E6028622F002AE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=michael.qiu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jhoanna.e.mata@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).