DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Yong Wang <yongwang@vmware.com>,  "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] app/testpmd:test VxLAN Tx checksum offload
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:16:06 +0100
Message-ID: <545CFE56.60605@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c654d2c0d304b45a40af6ca38b70adf@EX13-MBX-026.vmware.com>

Hello Yong,

On 11/07/2014 01:43 AM, Yong Wang wrote:
>>> As to HW TX checksum offload, do you have special requirement for implementing TSO?
> 
>> Yes. TSO implies TX TCP and IP checksum offload.
> 
> Is this a general requirement or something specific to ixgbe/i40e? FWIW,
> vmxnet3 device does not support tx IP checksum offload but doe support
> TSO.  In that case, we cannot leave IP checksum field as 0 (the correct
> checksum needs to be filled in the header) before passing it the the NIC
> when TSO is enabled.

This is a good question because we need to define the proper API that
will work on other PMDs in the future.

Indeed, there is a hardware specificity in ixgbe: when TSO is enabled,
the IP checksum flag must also be passed to the driver if it's IPv4.
>From 82599 datasheets (7.2.3.2.4 Advanced Transmit Data Descriptor):

    IXSM (bit 0) — Insert IP Checksum: This field indicates that IP
    checksum must be inserted. In IPv6 mode, it must be reset to 0b.
    If DCMD.TSE and TUCMD.IPV4 are set, IXSM must be set as well.
    If this bit is set, the packet should at least contain an
    IP header.

If we allow the user to give the TSO flag without the IP checksum
flag in mbuf flags, the ixgbe driver would have to set the IP checksum
flag in hardware descriptors if the packet is IPv4. The driver would
have to parse the IP header: this is not a problem as we already need
it for TCP checksum.

To summarize, I think we have 3 options when transmitting a packet to be
segmented using TSO:

- set IP checksum to 0 in the application: in this case, it would
  require additional work in virtual drivers if the peer expects
  to receive a packet with a valid IP checksum. But I'm wondering
  what is the need for calculating a checksum when transmitting on
  a virtual device (the peer receiving the packet knows that the
  packet is not corrupted as it comes from memory). Moreover, if the
  device advertise TSO, I assume it can also advertise IP checksum
  offload.

- calculate the IP checksum in the application. It would take additional
  cycles although it may not be needed as the driver probably knows
  how to calculate it.

- if the driver supports both TSO and IP checksum, the 2 flags MUST
  be given to the driver and the IP checksum must be set to 0 and the
  checksum cannot be calculated in software. If the driver only
  supports TSO, the checksum has to be calculated in software.

Currently, I choosen the first solution, but I'm open to change the
design. Maybe the 3rd one is also a good solution.

By the way, we had the same kind of discussion with Konstantin [1]
about what to do with the TCP checksum. My feeling is that setting it
to the pseudo-header checksum is the best we can do:
 - linux does that
 - many hardware requires that (this is not the case for ixgbe, which
   need a pshdr checksum without the IP len)
 - it can be reused if received by a virtual device and sent to a
   physical device supporting TSO

Best regards,
Olivier


[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002766.html

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-07 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-27  2:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/10] Support VxLAN on Fortville Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 01/10] librte_mbuf:the rte_mbuf structure changes Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 02/10] librte_ether:add the basic data structures of VxLAN Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/10] librte_ether:add VxLAN packet identification API Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 04/10] i40e:support VxLAN packet identification in i40e Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/10] app/test-pmd:test VxLAN packet identification Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 06/10] librte_ether:add data structures of VxLAN filter Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 07/10] i40e:implement the API of VxLAN filter in librte_pmd_i40e Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/10] app/testpmd:test VxLAN packet filter Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/10] i40e:support VxLAN Tx checksum offload Jijiang Liu
2014-10-27  2:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] app/testpmd:test " Jijiang Liu
2014-11-04  8:19   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-05  6:02     ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-05 10:28       ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 11:24         ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-06 13:08           ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 14:27             ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-07  0:43         ` Yong Wang
2014-11-07 17:16           ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2014-11-10 11:39             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-10 15:57               ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-12  9:55                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-12 13:05                   ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-12 13:40                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-12 23:14                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-12 14:39                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-12 14:56                       ` Olivier MATZ
     [not found]             ` <D0868B54.24DBB%yongwang@vmware.com>
2014-11-11  0:07               ` [dpdk-dev] FW: " Yong Wang
2014-11-10  6:03         ` [dpdk-dev] " Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-10 16:17           ` Olivier MATZ
     [not found]             ` <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D8F7A7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-11-12 17:26               ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-13  5:35                 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-13  5:39                   ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-13  6:51                 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-13  9:10                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-14  8:15                     ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-14  9:09                       ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-17  6:52                         ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-17 11:21                           ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-20  7:28                             ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-11-20 16:36                               ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-21  5:40                                 ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-10-27  2:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/10] Support VxLAN on Fortville Liu, Yong
2014-10-27  2:41 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-10-27 13:46   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-27 14:34     ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-10-27 15:15       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=545CFE56.60605@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yongwang@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git