DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] test/event_crypto: fix missing IV value for AES algo
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:36:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5612CB344B05EE4F95FC5B729939F780795E3E51@PGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107090121.3246-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>

For series:
Acked-by: abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com

I noticed that these patches have issue with "Intel-compilation".
Hope, it will be taken care before merging. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 2:31 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: jerinjacobk@gmail.com; Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] test/event_crypto: fix missing IV value for AES algo
> 
> The IV was not set, which was causing HW based SEC on DPAA1 to fail.
> 
> Fixes: ce02103ad072 ("test/event_crypto: change the SEC cipher algo")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
> ---
> Sending only the fixes. dropped the functional changes
> 
>  app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> index 652e458f0..bf83a6357 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ test_op_forward_mode(uint8_t session_less)
>  	struct rte_event ev;
>  	uint32_t cap;
>  	int ret;
> +	uint8_t cipher_key[17];
> 
>  	memset(&m_data, 0, sizeof(m_data));
> 
> @@ -186,6 +187,11 @@ test_op_forward_mode(uint8_t session_less)
>  	cipher_xform.cipher.algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC;
>  	cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
> 
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.key.data = cipher_key;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.key.length = 16;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 16;
> +
>  	op = rte_crypto_op_alloc(params.op_mpool,
>  			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(op,
> @@ -364,6 +370,7 @@ test_op_new_mode(uint8_t session_less)
>  	struct rte_mbuf *m;
>  	uint32_t cap;
>  	int ret;
> +	uint8_t cipher_key[17];
> 
>  	memset(&m_data, 0, sizeof(m_data));
> 
> @@ -379,6 +386,11 @@ test_op_new_mode(uint8_t session_less)
>  	cipher_xform.cipher.algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_AES_CBC;
>  	cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
> 
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.key.data = cipher_key;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.key.length = 16;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.iv.offset = IV_OFFSET;
> +	cipher_xform.cipher.iv.length = 16;
> +
>  	op = rte_crypto_op_alloc(params.op_mpool,
>  			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_SYMMETRIC);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(op, "Failed to allocate crypto_op!\n");
> --
> 2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-19 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-01 11:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] " Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] test/event_crypto: fix check for HW support Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] test/event_crypto: fix to avail the mempool entries Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] test/event_crypto: support to release the atomic ctxt Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] test/event_crypto: use device cap instead of fixed values Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-01 11:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] test/event_crypto: separate the NEW and FWD mode inits Hemant Agrawal
2019-10-03  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] test/event_crypto: fix missing IV value for AES algo Jerin Jacob
2019-10-03  4:52   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2019-10-04  9:35 ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2019-10-16  8:01   ` Jerin Jacob
2019-10-18  5:28   ` Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-07  9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] " Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-07  9:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] test/event_crypto: fix to avail the mempool entries Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-07  9:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] test/event_crypto: fix check for HW support Hemant Agrawal
2019-11-18 15:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] test/event_crypto: fix missing IV value for AES algo Jerin Jacob
2019-11-18 16:02     ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S
2019-11-19 10:36   ` Gujjar, Abhinandan S [this message]
2019-11-20 13:39   ` Jerin Jacob
2019-11-26  5:55     ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5612CB344B05EE4F95FC5B729939F780795E3E51@PGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).