DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lib/librte_port: add PCAP file support to source port
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:54:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56AA0161.30308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453916363-26709-2-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>

On 01/27/2016 07:39 PM, Fan Zhang wrote:
> Originally, source ports in librte_port is an input port used as packet
> generator. Similar to Linux kernel /dev/zero character device, it
> generates null packets. This patch adds optional PCAP file support to
> source port: instead of sending NULL packets, the source port generates
> packets copied from a PCAP file. To increase the performance, the packets
> in the file are loaded to memory initially, and copied to mbufs in circular
> manner. Users can enable or disable this feature by setting
> CONFIG_RTE_PORT_PCAP compiler option "y" or "n".
>
> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> ---
>   config/common_bsdapp                   |   1 +
>   config/common_linuxapp                 |   1 +
>   lib/librte_port/Makefile               |   4 +
>   lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h |   7 ++
>   mk/rte.app.mk                          |   1 +
>   6 files changed, 204 insertions(+)
>
[...]
> +#ifdef RTE_PORT_PCAP
> +
> +/**
> + * Load PCAP file, allocate and copy packets in the file to memory
> + *
> + * @param p
> + *   Parameters for source port
> + * @param port
> + *   Handle to source port
> + * @param socket_id
> + *   Socket id where the memory is created
> + * @return
> + *   0 on SUCCESS
> + *   error code otherwise
> + */
> +static int
> +pcap_source_load(struct rte_port_source_params *p,
> +		struct rte_port_source *port,
> +		int socket_id)
> +{
[...]
> +#else
> +static int
> +pcap_source_load(__rte_unused struct rte_port_source_params *p,
> +		struct rte_port_source *port,
> +		__rte_unused int socket_id)
> +{
> +	port->pkt_buff = NULL;
> +	port->pkt_len = NULL;
> +	port->pkts = NULL;
> +	port->pkt_index = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif

Same as in patch 3/4, shouldn't this return -ENOTSUP when pcap support 
is not built in, instead of success?

[...]

> diff --git a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h
> index 0f9be79..6f39bec 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,13 @@ extern "C" {
>   struct rte_port_source_params {
>   	/** Pre-initialized buffer pool */
>   	struct rte_mempool *mempool;
> +	/** The full path of the pcap file to read packets from */
> +	char *file_name;
> +	/** The number of bytes to be read from each packet in the
> +	 *  pcap file. If this value is 0, the whole packet is read;
> +	 *  if it is bigger than packet size, the generated packets
> +	 *  will contain the whole packet */
> +	uint32_t n_bytes_per_pkt;
>   };

This is a likely ABI-break. It "only" appends to the struct, which might 
in some cases be okay but only when there's no sensible use for the 
struct within arrays or embedded in structs. The ip_pipeline example for 
example embeds struct rte_port_source_params within another struct which 
is could be thought of as an indication that other applications might be 
doing this as well.

An ABI break for librte_port has not been announced for 2.3 so you'd 
need to announce the intent to do so in 2.4 now, and then either wait 
till post 2.3 or wrap this in CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI.

	- Panu -

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-27 17:39 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add PCAP support to source and sink port Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lib/librte_port: add PCAP file support to source port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:54   ` Panu Matilainen [this message]
2016-01-29 15:10     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add PCAP file support Fan Zhang
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] lib/librte_port: add packet dumping to PCAP file support in sink port Fan Zhang
2016-01-28 11:43   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-29 15:34     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2016-01-27 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/ip_pipeline: add packets dumping to PCAP file support Fan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56AA0161.30308@redhat.com \
    --to=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).