DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
	"Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: using initial-exec model for thread	local	variable
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:22:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E630EF9EF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0401MB1772274CE71E8959117A22B4E3400@HE1PR0401MB1772.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Saxena
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 10:46 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>;
> thomas@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: using initial-exec model for thread
> local variable
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > When building share library, thread-local storage model will be changed
> to
> > global-dynamic. It will add additional cost for reading thread local
> variable.
> > On the other hand, dynamically load share library with static TLS will
> request
> > additional DTV slot which is limited by loader. By now only
> librte_pmd_eal.so
> > contain thread local variable. So that can make TLS model back to
> initial-exec
> > like static library for better performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > index 7e4531bab..19d5e11ef 100644
> > --- a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > +++ b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > @@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ ifeq (,$(findstring -O0,$(EXTRA_CFLAGS)))  endif
> endif
> >
> > +# Initial execution TLS model has better performane compared to dynamic
> > +# global. But this model require for addtional slot on DTV when dlopen
> > +# object with thread local variable.
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
> > +TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS += -ftls-model=initial-exec endif
> > +
> 
> [Sachin Saxena]   Using initial-exec model for shared object is not
> recommended. If you link a shared object containing IE-model, the object
> will have the DF_STATIC_TLS flag set. By the spec, this means that dlopen()
> might refuse to load it if TLS usage is greater than static TLS space.
> This is what happening, when I tried to validate this change on ARM64
> based NXP platform with VPP-dpdk solution. VPP initialization fails with
> following error:
>   "load_one_plugin:145: /usr/lib/vpp_plugins/dpdk_plugin.so: cannot
> allocate memory in static TLS block"
> 
> Note that dpdk dpaa2 driver and VPP both uses TLS variables quite
> significantly. When forced to Initial-exec model in dpdk shared object,
> VPP static TLS space is getting exhausted and dlopen() returns error while
> trying to load the DPDK object.
> For same reason, when we use "-fPIC" the default TLS model changed to
> "global-dynamics" from "Initial-exec".
> 
> In my opinion, this change should not be merged as it is breaking basic
> functionality.

Thanks for your opinion, Sachin. 
IE model may cause problem when using dlopen open share object. On the other hand, it can benefit performance.
It will be better to keep current workable setting and users may change it by themselves.

Regards,
Marvin

> 
> >  WERROR_FLAGS := -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> > WERROR_FLAGS += -Wmissing-declarations -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-
> > arith  WERROR_FLAGS += -Wcast-align -Wnested-externs -Wcast-qual
> > --
> > 2.17.0

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-05 14:13 Marvin Liu
2018-07-05  9:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-05 14:46 ` Sachin Saxena
2018-07-06  2:22   ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2018-07-06 10:02     ` Bruce Richardson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-28  9:54 Marvin Liu
2018-04-28  4:39 ` Yang, Zhiyong
2018-05-18  9:46   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E630EF9EF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).