DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@arm.com>,
	Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>,
	kmacy@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:18:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92d5a426-fa1b-cc58-bb8c-ca4dd7487220@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60d7010d-caf8-8ade-a34c-7e284842cded@nxp.com>

Hi hermant


On 1/22/2018 1:15 PM, Hemant Agrawal Wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> On 1/22/2018 7:23 AM, Jia He wrote:
>>>>> This is BSD-2-freebsd, which is not a approved license for DPDK.
>>>>> Can you ask Kip Macy, if he/she is ok to re-license it with BSD-3?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check with legal, if you can just keep the copyright of Kip
>>>>> Macy and re license it with BSD-3.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see the BSD-3 license to be permissive enough to be re-licensed as
>>>>> BSD-3.
>>>>> But I am not a lawyer.
>>>>>
>>>> I agree this is something we should do, as a maintainer of
>>>> librte_ring, I can
>>>> do it.
>>>>
>>>> But here, Jia is just moving code in a new file. I don't think this
>>>> should block
>>>> his patchset from beeing included.
>>>   [Hemant]   I thought of blocking this kind of moves, so that we get
>>> the license complaint of DPDK faster 😊
>>>
>>> Jia, shall keep the original copyrights and headers in this file (i.e.
>>> No SPDX).   You need to fix it along with rte_ring.h in near future.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hemant
>>>
>> Ok, I will
>> Besides ,I got the allowance from Kip Macy just now. He/She allowed dpdk
>> to license librte_ring.h as BSD-3.
>>
>> My question:
>>> Would you mind allowing dpdk librte_ring.h to be licensed as BSD 3
>> instead of BSD 2?
>> His/her reply:
>>
>> "I think that's fine. If you're using it be careful I think there's a
>> fix to memory barrier usage needed more relaxed memory models such as
>> ARM. I'll check reviews to see if it made it in or not."
>>
>
> That is good. Your Patch v9 looks ok.
>
> Will you please also add another patch for following:
> (all files in librte_ring - having BSD-2 license)
>
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>  *
>  * Copyright ..... (Intel or your company)
>  * Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Kip Macy kmacy@freebsd.org
>  * All rights reserved.
>  * Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
>  * Used as BSD-3 Licensed with permission from Kip Macy.
>  */
>
>
With pleasure, thanks

-- 
Cheers,
Jia

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-22  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17  4:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Jia He
2018-01-17  4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/arm64: remove the braces {} for dmb() and dsb() Jia He
2018-01-17  4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions Jia He
2018-01-19 14:15   ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-19 16:38     ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-19 16:47       ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-22  1:53         ` Jia He
     [not found]           ` <60d7010d-caf8-8ade-a34c-7e284842cded@nxp.com>
2018-01-22  6:18             ` Jia He [this message]
2018-01-22 16:54         ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-17  4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ring: introduce new header file to support C11 memory model Jia He
2018-01-17  8:24   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-17  8:47     ` Jia He
2018-01-17  9:09       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-18 23:52         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19  2:22           ` Jia He
2018-01-19 15:04           ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-19 14:25       ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-22  4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Jia He
2018-01-22  4:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] eal/arm64: remove the braces {} for dmb() and dsb() Jia He
2018-01-22  4:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions Jia He
2018-01-22  4:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] ring: introduce new header file to support C11 memory model Jia He
2018-01-22  7:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-22  8:26     ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-22  8:29       ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-22  8:40     ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-29 15:11   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92d5a426-fa1b-cc58-bb8c-ca4dd7487220@gmail.com \
    --to=hejianet@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
    --cc=jianbo.liu@arm.com \
    --cc=kmacy@freebsd.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).