From: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@arm.com>,
Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Jia He <jia.he@hxt-semitech.com>,
kmacy@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:18:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92d5a426-fa1b-cc58-bb8c-ca4dd7487220@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60d7010d-caf8-8ade-a34c-7e284842cded@nxp.com>
Hi hermant
On 1/22/2018 1:15 PM, Hemant Agrawal Wrote:
> Hi Jia,
>
> On 1/22/2018 7:23 AM, Jia He wrote:
>>>>> This is BSD-2-freebsd, which is not a approved license for DPDK.
>>>>> Can you ask Kip Macy, if he/she is ok to re-license it with BSD-3?
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check with legal, if you can just keep the copyright of Kip
>>>>> Macy and re license it with BSD-3.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see the BSD-3 license to be permissive enough to be re-licensed as
>>>>> BSD-3.
>>>>> But I am not a lawyer.
>>>>>
>>>> I agree this is something we should do, as a maintainer of
>>>> librte_ring, I can
>>>> do it.
>>>>
>>>> But here, Jia is just moving code in a new file. I don't think this
>>>> should block
>>>> his patchset from beeing included.
>>> [Hemant] I thought of blocking this kind of moves, so that we get
>>> the license complaint of DPDK faster 😊
>>>
>>> Jia, shall keep the original copyrights and headers in this file (i.e.
>>> No SPDX). You need to fix it along with rte_ring.h in near future.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hemant
>>>
>> Ok, I will
>> Besides ,I got the allowance from Kip Macy just now. He/She allowed dpdk
>> to license librte_ring.h as BSD-3.
>>
>> My question:
>>> Would you mind allowing dpdk librte_ring.h to be licensed as BSD 3
>> instead of BSD 2?
>> His/her reply:
>>
>> "I think that's fine. If you're using it be careful I think there's a
>> fix to memory barrier usage needed more relaxed memory models such as
>> ARM. I'll check reviews to see if it made it in or not."
>>
>
> That is good. Your Patch v9 looks ok.
>
> Will you please also add another patch for following:
> (all files in librte_ring - having BSD-2 license)
>
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> *
> * Copyright ..... (Intel or your company)
> * Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Kip Macy kmacy@freebsd.org
> * All rights reserved.
> * Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
> * Used as BSD-3 Licensed with permission from Kip Macy.
> */
>
>
With pleasure, thanks
--
Cheers,
Jia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-22 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 4:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Jia He
2018-01-17 4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/arm64: remove the braces {} for dmb() and dsb() Jia He
2018-01-17 4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions Jia He
2018-01-19 14:15 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-19 16:38 ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-19 16:47 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-22 1:53 ` Jia He
[not found] ` <60d7010d-caf8-8ade-a34c-7e284842cded@nxp.com>
2018-01-22 6:18 ` Jia He [this message]
2018-01-22 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-17 4:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] ring: introduce new header file to support C11 memory model Jia He
2018-01-17 8:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-17 8:47 ` Jia He
2018-01-17 9:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-18 23:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19 2:22 ` Jia He
2018-01-19 15:04 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-19 14:25 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-22 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Jia He
2018-01-22 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] eal/arm64: remove the braces {} for dmb() and dsb() Jia He
2018-01-22 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] ring: introduce new header file to include common functions Jia He
2018-01-22 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] ring: introduce new header file to support C11 memory model Jia He
2018-01-22 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] support c11 memory model barrier in librte_ring Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-22 8:26 ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-22 8:29 ` Olivier Matz
2018-01-22 8:40 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-29 15:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92d5a426-fa1b-cc58-bb8c-ca4dd7487220@gmail.com \
--to=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=jia.he@hxt-semitech.com \
--cc=jianbo.liu@arm.com \
--cc=kmacy@freebsd.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).