DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Tao, Zhe" <zhe.tao@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e:Fix the Descriptor Done check mechanism for i40e
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 03:31:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8C6473D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436410688-663-1-git-send-email-zhe.tao@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tao, Zhe
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:58 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Tao, Zhe; Wu, Jingjing
> Subject: [PATCH v3] i40e:Fix the Descriptor Done check mechanism for i40e
> 
> If a descriptor the device drive is handling is the context descriptor, its type
> value will be 0x1.
> When using the not operator ! to do the conditional check, if the expression
> value is zero, the device driver will consider the transaction for this descriptor
> has been completed, even its DD field is still 0x1 which means NIC has not
> finished the operation on this descriptor.
> Use the 0xF to check the DD status to avoid the above issue happens.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhe Tao <zhe.tao@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Patch v3 changes:
> -Fix typo for the patch
> 
> Patch v2 changes:
> -Fix the DD check mechanism for other functions (besides the
> i40e_xmit_cleanup) which use the DD bits to do conditional check
> 
> changes:
> -Fix the DD check mechanism for i40e_xmit_cleanup
> 
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c |  3 ++-
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 10 ++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c index
> 4bf98d0..f3cb757 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> @@ -1110,7 +1110,8 @@ i40e_fdir_filter_programming(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < I40E_FDIR_WAIT_COUNT; i++) {
>  		rte_delay_us(I40E_FDIR_WAIT_INTERVAL_US);
> -		if (txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +		if ((txdp->cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) ==
> 
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
>  			break;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 2de0ac4..7c0c684 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -574,8 +574,9 @@ i40e_xmit_cleanup(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
>  		desc_to_clean_to = (uint16_t)(desc_to_clean_to -
> nb_tx_desc);
> 
>  	desc_to_clean_to = sw_ring[desc_to_clean_to].last_id;
> -	if (!(txd[desc_to_clean_to].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> -		rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))) {
> +	if ((txd[desc_to_clean_to].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)) {
>  		PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG, "TX descriptor %4u is not done
> "
>  			"(port=%d queue=%d)", desc_to_clean_to,
>  				txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> @@ -1431,8 +1432,9 @@ i40e_tx_free_bufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)
>  	struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
>  	uint16_t i;
> 
> -	if (!(txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> -
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)))
> +	if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	txep = &(txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1)]);
> --
> 1.8.4.2

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-03 17:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: Fix the clean up function for i40e, the DD bits are multiplex with descriptor type field. so cannot use "not zero" as the rule for the completion of Tx descriptor Zhe Tao
2015-07-08  9:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] i40e:Fix the Description Done check mechanism for i40e Zhe Tao
2015-07-09  2:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e:Fix the Descriptor " Zhe Tao
2015-07-09  3:31     ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2015-07-10 16:56       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-16 19:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: Fix the clean up function for i40e, the DD bits are multiplex with descriptor type field. so cannot use "not zero" as the rule for the completion of Tx descriptor Zhang, Helin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8C6473D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=zhe.tao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).