DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gajdzica, MaciejX T" <maciejx.t.gajdzica@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] ip_pipeline: added master pipeline
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:58:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9CC680510C0AC140A846FED2EF7F96281384BDE9@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2556845.B31QGe61c9@xps13>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gajdzica, MaciejX T
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:03 AM
> To: 'Thomas Monjalon'; Singh, Jasvinder
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] ip_pipeline: added master pipeline
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:33 AM
> > To: Gajdzica, MaciejX T; Singh, Jasvinder
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] ip_pipeline: added master
> > pipeline
> >
> > 2015-07-07 10:09, Maciej Gajdzica:
> > > From: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Master pipeline is responsible for command line handling and
> > > communicationg with all other pipelines via message queues. Removed
> > > cmdline.c file, as its functionality will be split over multiple
> > > pipeline files.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> >
> > In this v6, it builds well until patch 05 which uses some not exported symbols:
> > pipeline_common_be.c:(.text+0x51): undefined reference to
> > `rte_pipeline_port_in_stats_read'
> > pipeline_common_be.c:(.text+0x91): undefined reference to
> > `rte_pipeline_port_out_stats_read'
> > pipeline_common_be.c:(.text+0xd4): undefined reference to
> > `rte_pipeline_table_stats_read'
> >
> > Please check build with shared libraries.
> 
> There are missing symbols in map file for librte_port and librte_pipeline. I will
> send separate patch for that.

This compilation problem with shared libraries is not because something with this
patchset is wrong, but because exported symbols in map file in earlier patchsets are
missing. So after separate patches with fix will be applied, could you restore this patchset?

Best Regards
Maciek

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-07  8:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] ip_pipeline: ip_pipeline application enhancements Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/11] ip_pipeline: add parsing for config files with new syntax Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] ip_pipeline: added config checks Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/11] ip_pipeline: modified init to match new params struct Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/11] ip_pipeline: moved pipelines to separate folder Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] ip_pipeline: added master pipeline Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-08 22:33   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-09  8:03     ` Gajdzica, MaciejX T
2015-07-09  9:58     ` Gajdzica, MaciejX T [this message]
2015-07-09 10:00       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-07-09 10:06         ` Gajdzica, MaciejX T
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/11] ip_pipeline: added application thread Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/11] ip_pipeline: moved config files to separate folder Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/11] ip_pipeline: added new implementation of passthrough pipeline Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/11] ip_pipeline: added new implementation of firewall pipeline Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/11] ip_pipeline: added new implementation of routing pipeline Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/11] ip_pipeline: added new implementation of flow classification pipeline Maciej Gajdzica
2015-07-07  8:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] ip_pipeline: ip_pipeline application enhancements Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 11:33   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-07-07  9:23 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-07-09 15:27   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9CC680510C0AC140A846FED2EF7F96281384BDE9@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=maciejx.t.gajdzica@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).