DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [dpdk-dev] About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User
       [not found] <D9CE3E0C-76CD-42E5-A716-D5F9D336BAD6@corp.netease.com>
@ 2018-01-23 10:46 ` Loftus, Ciara
  2018-01-23 11:49   ` Chen, Junjie J
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Loftus, Ciara @ 2018-01-23 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: liyang07; +Cc: dev, dev

Hi,

For the meantime this feature is proposed as ‘experimental’ for OVS DPDK.
Unless you are transmitting to a NIC, you don’t need to set the n_txq_desc.
My testing has been only with a DPDK driver in the guest. Have you tried that option?

Thanks,
Ciara

From: liyang07 [mailto:liyang07@corp.netease.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 10:41 AM
To: Loftus, Ciara <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User


Hi Ciara,

    I am tesing the function of "vHost dequeue zero copy" for vm2vm on a host, and I have some problems:

    1. The networking is OK before run iperf, I can ping successed from vm1 to vm2,but after run iperf, the networking between vm1 and vm2 is down;(I think n_txq_desc cause the problem)

    2. I know the limitation about n_txq_desc, but I cannot set the n_txq_desc for dpdkport while the vms on the same host, because there is no dpdkports work fow my testing;



    Thus, how can I resolve it, thanks.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User
  2018-01-23 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User Loftus, Ciara
@ 2018-01-23 11:49   ` Chen, Junjie J
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chen, Junjie J @ 2018-01-23 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Loftus, Ciara, liyang07; +Cc: dev, dev

Hi
Which version of dpdk you are using? I have some fixes for dequeue zero copy and now in 18.02-rc1, you can try 18.02-r1.

Cheers
JJ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Loftus, Ciara
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:46 PM
> To: liyang07 <liyang07@corp.netease.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost
> User
> 
> Hi,
> 
> For the meantime this feature is proposed as ‘experimental’ for OVS DPDK.
> Unless you are transmitting to a NIC, you don’t need to set the n_txq_desc.
> My testing has been only with a DPDK driver in the guest. Have you tried that
> option?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ciara
> 
> From: liyang07 [mailto:liyang07@corp.netease.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 10:41 AM
> To: Loftus, Ciara <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User
> 
> 
> Hi Ciara,
> 
>     I am tesing the function of "vHost dequeue zero copy" for vm2vm on a
> host, and I have some problems:
> 
>     1. The networking is OK before run iperf, I can ping successed from vm1
> to vm2,but after run iperf, the networking between vm1 and vm2 is down;(I
> think n_txq_desc cause the problem)
> 
>     2. I know the limitation about n_txq_desc, but I cannot set the
> n_txq_desc for dpdkport while the vms on the same host, because there is
> no dpdkports work fow my testing;
> 
> 
> 
>     Thus, how can I resolve it, thanks.
> 
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-23 11:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <D9CE3E0C-76CD-42E5-A716-D5F9D336BAD6@corp.netease.com>
2018-01-23 10:46 ` [dpdk-dev] About : Enable optional dequeue zero copy for vHost User Loftus, Ciara
2018-01-23 11:49   ` Chen, Junjie J

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).