Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice

[Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: techboard <techboard-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Maxime
> Coquelin
> 
> On 8/12/20 12:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 12/08/2020 11:52, Bruce Richardson:
> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona:
> >>>> Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner.
> >>>>
> >>>> Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes
> >>>> that are recommended and agreed throughout DPDK do you think an
> >>>> exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even
> without the deprecation notice being in 20.08?
> >>>
> >>> That's a question for techboard.
> >>>
> >>> PS: please avoid top-posting
> >>>
> >> My initial 2c is that we should allow this, and add the required
> >> deprecation notice to the online docs immediately. I would assume
> >> most people use the online docs rather than building their own from
> >> the package, therefore adding in a deprecation notice to the online
> >> versions a few days after a release should not be a major problem IMHO.
> >>
> >> Also, given the fact that we have once-a-year at most to apply ABI
> >> changes, and this is the first time we are going this, so I think a
> >> little latitude should be given! :-)
> >
> > I agree
> >
> > We need more opinions from other techboard members to make it a
> decision.
> >
> >
> 
> I agree too, let's give a bit more flexibility for the deprecation notice.
> 
> Maxime

+1
Hemant