DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] devtools: increase default line length to 100
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:00:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3301FF86A6F83E02E5CA36FA9A820@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200609092949.GA1565@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>


> 
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:17:23PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon,  8 Jun 2020 17:46:40 +0100
> > Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Rather than continuing to recommend an 80-char line limit, let's take a hint
> > > from the Linux kernel[1] and aim for an 100-char recommended limit instead.
> > >
> > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bdc48fa11e46f867ea4d75fa59ee87a7f48be144
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  devtools/checkpatches.sh                 | 2 +-
> > >  doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst | 2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/devtools/checkpatches.sh b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > > index 158087f1c..4970ed830 100755
> > > --- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > > +++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ VALIDATE_NEW_API=$(dirname $(readlink -f $0))/check-symbol-change.sh
> > >  # Codespell can also be enabled by setting DPDK_CHECKPATCH_CODESPELL to a valid path
> > >  # to a dictionary.txt file if dictionary.txt is not in the default location.
> > >  codespell=${DPDK_CHECKPATCH_CODESPELL:-enable}
> > > -length=${DPDK_CHECKPATCH_LINE_LENGTH:-80}
> > > +length=${DPDK_CHECKPATCH_LINE_LENGTH:-100}
> > >
> > >  # override default Linux options
> > >  options="--no-tree"
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
> > > index 4efde93f6..1db3a7bbe 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
> > > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ The rules and guidelines given in this document cannot cover every situation, so
> > >  * In the case of creating new files, the style should be consistent within each file in a given directory or module.
> > >  * The primary reason for coding standards is to increase code readability and comprehensibility, therefore always use whatever option
> will make the code easiest to read.
> > >
> > > -Line length is recommended to be not more than 80 characters, including comments.
> > > +Line length is recommended to be not more than 100 characters, including comments.
> > >  [Tab stop size should be assumed to be 8-characters wide].
> > >
> > >  .. note::
> >
> > I would even support going to 120 characters.
> >
> > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> 
> I think 100 is enough.
> 
> In my case, I have a 1080p 24" monitor, and with two terminals side-by-side
> 100 characters just fits inside each vim window. Going to 120 would be fine
> for single terminal at a time, but I would find awkward for e.g.
> side-by-side diff comparison in meld etc.

My preference would be to keep things as it is - 80 chars per line.
Having multiple different formatting styles in one source file
looks really awkward and make it hard to follow.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-08 16:46 Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-06-09  4:42   ` Jerin Jacob
2020-06-09  9:29   ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-09 10:00     ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2020-06-09 13:40       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-06-09 13:57         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-10  5:22           ` Jerin Jacob
2020-06-10  8:27             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-06-10  8:47               ` Jerin Jacob
2020-06-10  9:28                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-06-10  9:59                   ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-07  0:29 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB3301FF86A6F83E02E5CA36FA9A820@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git