DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Somalapuram, Amaranath" <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/axgbe: support sfp module EEPROM
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:31:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB28213D54D2E3AF71CD11E6C1F8D00@BYAPR12MB2821.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0466be3c-1017-4416-b737-11f603ede7e2@intel.com>



-----Original Message-----
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 7:54 PM
To: Somalapuram, Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/axgbe: support sfp module EEPROM

[CAUTION: External Email]

On 12/22/2020 7:01 AM, asomalap@amd.com wrote:
> From: Amaranath Somalapuram <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
>
> Adding API for get_module_eeprom and get_module_info.wq
>
> Signed-off-by: Amaranath Somalapuram <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini |   1 +
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c   |   2 +
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h      |   4 ++
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini 
> b/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> index 34df0d1ee..3a090183e 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/axgbe.ini
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ CRC offload          = Y
>   L3 checksum offload  = Y
>   L4 checksum offload  = Y
>   Basic stats          = Y
> +Module EEPROM dump   = Y
>   Linux UIO            = Y
>   x86-32               = Y
>   x86-64               = Y
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c 
> b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> index cfe6aba73..22e05e8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops axgbe_eth_dev_ops = {
>       .timesync_adjust_time         = axgbe_timesync_adjust_time,
>       .timesync_read_time           = axgbe_timesync_read_time,
>       .timesync_write_time          = axgbe_timesync_write_time,
> +     .get_module_info              = axgbe_get_module_info,
> +     .get_module_eeprom            = axgbe_get_module_eeprom,
>   };
>
>   static int axgbe_phy_reset(struct axgbe_port *pdata) diff --git 
> a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h index 
> 77ee20a31..d9d7fde41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy.h
> @@ -188,5 +188,9 @@
>   #define DUPLEX_FULL             0x01
>   #define DUPLEX_UNKNOWN          0xff
>
> +int axgbe_get_module_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +                             struct rte_eth_dev_module_info 
> +*modinfo); int axgbe_get_module_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +                               struct rte_dev_eeprom_info *info);
>   #endif
>   /* PHY */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c 
> b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> index 02236ec19..af18a8d51 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_phy_impl.c
> @@ -141,12 +141,18 @@ enum axgbe_sfp_speed {
>
>   #define AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_CC                   31
>
> +#define AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE           256
> +
>   struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom {
>       u8 base[64];
>       u8 extd[32];
>       u8 vendor[32];
>   };
>
> +struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom_module {
> +     u8 base[AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE]; };
> +
>   #define AXGBE_BEL_FUSE_VENDOR       "BEL-FUSE"
>   #define AXGBE_BEL_FUSE_PARTNO       "1GBT-SFP06"
>
> @@ -734,6 +740,108 @@ static int axgbe_phy_sfp_read_eeprom(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
>       return ret;
>   }
>
> +int axgbe_get_module_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +                             struct rte_eth_dev_module_info *modinfo) 
> +{
> +     struct axgbe_port *pdata = dev->data->dev_private;
> +     struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom sfp_eeprom;
> +     uint8_t eeprom_addr;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_get_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +
> +     if (ret)
> +             return -EIO;
> +
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_sfp_get_mux(pdata);
> +
> +     if (ret) {
> +             PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error setting SFP MUX\n");
> +             goto put;
> +     }
> +
> +     eeprom_addr = 0;
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS,
> +                     &eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +                      &sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +
> +     if (ret) {
> +             PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error reading SFP EEPROM\n");
> +             goto put;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (sfp_eeprom.extd[AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_SFF_8472] != 0xff) {

The 'else' case of this check seems wrong, which returns success but doesn't set modinfo correctly.

I have used the reference code from i40e_ethdev.c and ixgbe_ethdev.c. let me know your inputs.

> +             if (sfp_eeprom.extd[AXGBE_SFP_EXTD_SFF_8472] == 0) {
> +                     modinfo->type = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
> +                     modinfo->eeprom_len = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
> +             } else {
> +                     modinfo->type = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472;
> +                     modinfo->eeprom_len = RTE_ETH_MODULE_SFF_8472_LEN;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +put:
> +     axgbe_phy_sfp_put_mux(pdata);
> +     axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int axgbe_get_module_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> +                             struct rte_dev_eeprom_info *info) {
> +     struct axgbe_port *pdata = dev->data->dev_private;
> +     struct axgbe_sfp_eeprom_module sfp_eeprom;
> +     uint8_t eeprom_addr;
> +     uint8_t *data;
> +     uint32_t i;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_get_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +
> +     if (ret)
> +             return -EIO;
> +
> +     if (!info || !info->length || !info->data) {

Up to you but it may be easier to verify the input and fail before taking the ownership of the device first.
Agreed.
> +             axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_sfp_get_mux(pdata);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error setting SFP MUX\n");
> +             goto put;
> +     }

Just a syntax issue, some lines has an empty line between 'ret' assignment and 'ret' check, but some does not (as above), can you please make it consistent.
Agreed.
> +
> +     eeprom_addr = 0;
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS,
> +                     &eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +                     &sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +     if (ret) {
> +             PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "I2C error reading SFP EEPROM\n");
> +             goto put;
> +     }
> +     data = info->data;
> +
> +     /* for AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS */
> +     for (i = 0; i < AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> +             data[i] = sfp_eeprom.base[i];

Should check if 'info->length' > 'AXGBE_SFP_SERIAL_ID_ADDRESS' before above assignment.
Agreed.
> +
> +     eeprom_addr = 0;
> +     ret = axgbe_phy_i2c_read(pdata, AXGBE_SFP_DIAG_INFO_ADDRESS,
> +                     &eeprom_addr, sizeof(eeprom_addr),
> +                     &sfp_eeprom, sizeof(sfp_eeprom));
> +
> +     /* for AXGBE_SFP_DIAG_INFO_ADDRESS */
> +     for (i = 0; i < info->length - AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> +             data[i + AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE] = 
> + sfp_eeprom.base[i];
> +

Will it be acceptable if the loop break in the middle because of missing space, "i < info->length - AXGBE_SFP_EEPROM_PAGE_SIZE"? If not, size needs to be checked before the loop.
Agreed.
> +put:
> +     axgbe_phy_sfp_put_mux(pdata);
> +     axgbe_phy_put_comm_ownership(pdata);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
>   static void axgbe_phy_sfp_signals(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
>   {
>       struct axgbe_phy_data *phy_data = pdata->phy_data;
>

Please reply for the else case issue. I can resubmit. Other I will fix.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14 13:43 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " asomalap
2020-05-14 16:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-12-22  7:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " asomalap
2021-01-04 14:23     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-06 12:31       ` Somalapuram, Amaranath [this message]
2021-01-06 14:02         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-01-12  5:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " asomalap
2021-01-18 15:17       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR12MB28213D54D2E3AF71CD11E6C1F8D00@BYAPR12MB2821.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).