From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/qos_sched: fix flow pause after 2M packets
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:07:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2283B0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404377976-9231-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yong Liu
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 5:00 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/qos_sched: fix flow pause after 2M
> packets
>
> After enable vector pmd, qos_sched only send 32 packets every burst.
> That will cause some packets not transmitted and therefore mempool
> will be drain after a while.
> App qos_sched now will re-send the packets which failed to send out in
> previous tx function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Waterman Cao <waterman.cao@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> b/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> index 7501147..59c4014 100755
> --- a/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> +++ b/examples/qos_sched/app_thread.c
> @@ -139,17 +139,11 @@ app_send_burst(struct thread_conf *qconf)
>
> do {
> ret = rte_eth_tx_burst(qconf->tx_port, qconf->tx_queue, mbufs,
> (uint16_t)n);
> - if (unlikely(ret < n)) { /* we cannot drop the packets, so re-send
> */
> - /* update number of packets to be sent */
> - n -= ret;
> - mbufs = (struct rte_mbuf **)&mbufs[ret];
> - /* limit number of retries to avoid endless loop */
> - /* reset retry counter if some packets were sent */
> - if (likely(ret != 0)) {
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
> - } while (ret != n);
> + /* we cannot drop the packets, so re-send */
> + /* update number of packets to be sent */
> + n -= ret;
> + mbufs = (struct rte_mbuf **)&mbufs[ret];
> + } while (n);
> }
>
>
> --
> 1.7.7.6
How about "mbufs += ret" rather than "mbufs = (struct rte_mbuf **)&mbufs[ret]"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 8:59 Yong Liu
2014-07-03 10:07 ` Xie, Huawei [this message]
2014-07-03 10:54 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2014-07-03 10:55 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2014-07-03 14:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2283B0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).