Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance regression in DPDK 1.8/2.0

[Paul Emmerich <emmericp@net.in.tum.de>]

Hi,


De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>:
> Could you tell me which changes you made here? I see you are using simple tx code path on 1.8.0, 
> but with the default values, you should be using vector tx, 
> unless you have changed anything in the tx configuration.

sorry, I might have written that down wrong or read the output wrong.
I did not modify the l2fwd example.


> So, just for clarification, 
> for l2fwd you used E3-1230 v2 (Ivy Bridge), at 1.6 GHz or 3.3 GHz?

At 1.6 GHz as it is simply too fast at 3.3 GHz ;)


I’ll probably write a minimal example that shows my
problem with tx only sometime next week.
I just used the l2fwd example to illustrate my point
with a 'builtin‘ example.

Paul