DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
To: Kalesh A P <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Cc: dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/bnxt: fix unsupported handling in PTP
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:16:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACZ4nhvFu0+-+HxS-N6BbR+amV+UKiwc24ZR7pdavWAjJ5HzXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318093523.1689-2-kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3326 bytes --]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 2:13 AM Kalesh A P
<kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
>
> Fixed to return error when PTP support is not supported on the port.
> Also, removed an unnecessary check inside bnxt_get_rx_ts().
>
> Fixes: b11cceb83a34 ("net/bnxt: support timesync")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ajit Kumar Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm.

> ---
>  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> index 3665f31..4fd9653 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> @@ -3395,9 +3395,6 @@ static int bnxt_get_rx_ts(struct bnxt *bp, uint64_t *ts)
>         uint16_t port_id;
>         uint32_t fifo;
>
> -       if (!ptp)
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -
>         fifo = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rte_read32((uint8_t *)bp->bar0 +
>                                 ptp->rx_mapped_regs[BNXT_PTP_RX_FIFO]));
>         if (!(fifo & BNXT_PTP_RX_FIFO_PENDING))
> @@ -3430,7 +3427,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_write_time(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct timespec *ts)
>         struct bnxt_ptp_cfg *ptp = bp->ptp_cfg;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         ns = rte_timespec_to_ns(ts);
>         /* Set the timecounters to a new value. */
> @@ -3450,7 +3447,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_read_time(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct timespec *ts)
>         int rc = 0;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         if (BNXT_CHIP_P5(bp))
>                 rc = bnxt_hwrm_port_ts_query(bp, BNXT_PTP_FLAGS_CURRENT_TIME,
> @@ -3472,7 +3469,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_enable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>         int rc;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         ptp->rx_filter = 1;
>         ptp->tx_tstamp_en = 1;
> @@ -3513,7 +3510,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_disable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>         struct bnxt_ptp_cfg *ptp = bp->ptp_cfg;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         ptp->rx_filter = 0;
>         ptp->tx_tstamp_en = 0;
> @@ -3540,7 +3537,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_read_rx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>         uint64_t ns;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         if (BNXT_CHIP_P5(bp))
>                 rx_tstamp_cycles = ptp->rx_timestamp;
> @@ -3563,7 +3560,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>         int rc = 0;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         if (BNXT_CHIP_P5(bp))
>                 rc = bnxt_hwrm_port_ts_query(bp, BNXT_PTP_FLAGS_PATH_TX,
> @@ -3584,7 +3581,7 @@ bnxt_timesync_adjust_time(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int64_t delta)
>         struct bnxt_ptp_cfg *ptp = bp->ptp_cfg;
>
>         if (!ptp)
> -               return 0;
> +               return -ENOTSUP;
>
>         ptp->tc.nsec += delta;
>         ptp->tx_tstamp_tc.nsec += delta;
> --
> 2.10.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-19  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18  9:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/bnxt: fix link state operations Kalesh A P
2021-03-18  9:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/bnxt: fix unsupported handling in PTP Kalesh A P
2021-03-19  0:16   ` Ajit Khaparde [this message]
2021-03-19  0:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/bnxt: fix link state operations Ajit Khaparde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACZ4nhvFu0+-+HxS-N6BbR+amV+UKiwc24ZR7pdavWAjJ5HzXg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).