From: jigsaw <jigsaw@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add user defined tag calculation callback to librte_distributor.
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:11:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHVfvh4yAdF-aDnV+sh+PgJpEUW18+aF0=JoZDwJtGHhh=5ZzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141105142743.GB9856@bricha3-MOBL3>
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for reply.
The idea is triggered by real life use case, where the flow id is buried in
L3 payload. Deep packet inspection is one of the scenarios, tunneled pkts
is another.
However, only functionality is verified. Performance impact has not been
checked yet.
To add distributor and another void * as params is nice.
Your advice of extract tags in a row inspired me another solution, which is
to change the union hash inside rte_mbuf:
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
index e8f9bfc..5b13c0b 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
uint16_t id;
} fdir; /**< Filter identifier if FDIR enabled */
uint32_t sched; /**< Hierarchical scheduler */
+ uint32_t user; /**< User defined hash tag */
} hash; /**< hash information */
/* second cache line - fields only used in slow path or on TX */
The new union field user is actually for documentation purpose only, coz
user application can set hash.rss value and have the same result.
Therefore, the user application is free to calculate the tag in burst mode
before calling rte_distributor_process.
Then rte_distributor_process needs to read next_mb->hash.user.
Does it sounds better?
I have another question: why the logical OR 1 is added to new_tag?
thx &
rgds,
-qinglai
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com
> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:30:37PM +0200, Qinglai Xiao wrote:
> > User defined tag calculation has access to mbuf.
> > Default tag is RSS hash result.
> >
>
> Interesting idea.
> Did you investigate was there any performance improvement or regression
> comparing
> whether the callback was called per-packet as packets were dequeued for
> distribution
> (i.e. how you have things now in your patch), compared to calling
> the callback in a loop to extract the tags for all packets initially? I
> suspect
> there probably isn't much performance difference either way, but it may be
> worth
> checking.
> One other point, is that I think the callback to extract the tag should
> have
> additional parameters - at least one, if not two. I would suggest that the
> distributor pointer be passed in, as well as an arbitrary void * pointer.
>
> Regards,
> /Bruce
>
> > Signed-off-by: Qinglai Xiao <jigsaw@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_distributor.c | 6 +++---
> > app/test/test_distributor_perf.c | 2 +-
> > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h | 7 ++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_distributor.c b/app/test/test_distributor.c
> > index ce06436..6ea4943 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_distributor.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_distributor.c
> > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ int test_error_distributor_create_name(void)
> > char *name = NULL;
> >
> > d = rte_distributor_create(name, rte_socket_id(),
> > - rte_lcore_count() - 1);
> > + rte_lcore_count() - 1, NULL);
> > if (d != NULL || rte_errno != EINVAL) {
> > printf("ERROR: No error on create() with NULL name
> param\n");
> > return -1;
> > @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ int test_error_distributor_create_numworkers(void)
> > {
> > struct rte_distributor *d = NULL;
> > d = rte_distributor_create("test_numworkers", rte_socket_id(),
> > - RTE_MAX_LCORE + 10);
> > + RTE_MAX_LCORE + 10, NULL);
> > if (d != NULL || rte_errno != EINVAL) {
> > printf("ERROR: No error on create() with num_workers >
> MAX\n");
> > return -1;
> > @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ test_distributor(void)
> >
> > if (d == NULL) {
> > d = rte_distributor_create("Test_distributor",
> rte_socket_id(),
> > - rte_lcore_count() - 1);
> > + rte_lcore_count() - 1, NULL);
> > if (d == NULL) {
> > printf("Error creating distributor\n");
> > return -1;
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_distributor_perf.c
> b/app/test/test_distributor_perf.c
> > index b04864c..507e446 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_distributor_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_distributor_perf.c
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ test_distributor_perf(void)
> >
> > if (d == NULL) {
> > d = rte_distributor_create("Test_perf", rte_socket_id(),
> > - rte_lcore_count() - 1);
> > + rte_lcore_count() - 1, NULL);
> > if (d == NULL) {
> > printf("Error creating distributor\n");
> > return -1;
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
> b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
> > index 585ff88..78c92bd 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct rte_distributor {
> > union rte_distributor_buffer bufs[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> >
> > struct rte_distributor_returned_pkts returns;
> > + rte_distributor_tag_fn tag_cb;
> > };
> >
> > TAILQ_HEAD(rte_distributor_list, rte_distributor);
> > @@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
> > struct rte_mbuf *next_mb = NULL;
> > int64_t next_value = 0;
> > uint32_t new_tag = 0;
> > + rte_distributor_tag_fn tag_cb = d->tag_cb;
> > unsigned ret_start = d->returns.start,
> > ret_count = d->returns.count;
> >
> > @@ -282,7 +284,11 @@ rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d,
> > next_mb = mbufs[next_idx++];
> > next_value = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)next_mb)
> > << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS);
> > - new_tag = (next_mb->hash.rss | 1);
> > + if (tag_cb) {
> > + new_tag = tag_cb(next_mb);
> > + } else {
> > + new_tag = (next_mb->hash.rss | 1);
> > + }
> >
> > uint32_t match = 0;
> > unsigned i;
> > @@ -401,7 +407,8 @@ rte_distributor_clear_returns(struct rte_distributor
> *d)
> > struct rte_distributor *
> > rte_distributor_create(const char *name,
> > unsigned socket_id,
> > - unsigned num_workers)
> > + unsigned num_workers,
> > + rte_distributor_tag_fn tag_cb)
> > {
> > struct rte_distributor *d;
> > struct rte_distributor_list *distributor_list;
> > @@ -435,6 +442,7 @@ rte_distributor_create(const char *name,
> > d = mz->addr;
> > snprintf(d->name, sizeof(d->name), "%s", name);
> > d->num_workers = num_workers;
> > + d->tag_cb = tag_cb;
> >
> > rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
> > TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(distributor_list, d, next);
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h
> b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h
> > index ec0d74a..844d325 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ extern "C" {
> >
> > struct rte_distributor;
> >
> > +typedef uint32_t (*rte_distributor_tag_fn)(struct rte_mbuf *);
> > +/**< User defined tag calculation function */
> > +
> > /**
> > * Function to create a new distributor instance
> > *
> > @@ -65,12 +68,14 @@ struct rte_distributor;
> > * @param num_workers
> > * The maximum number of workers that will request packets from this
> > * distributor
> > + * @param tag_cb
> > + * The callback function for calculation of user defined tag.
> > * @return
> > * The newly created distributor instance
> > */
> > struct rte_distributor *
> > rte_distributor_create(const char *name, unsigned socket_id,
> > - unsigned num_workers);
> > + unsigned num_workers, rte_distributor_tag_fn tag_cb);
> >
> > /* *** APIS to be called on the distributor lcore *** */
> > /*
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-05 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-05 13:30 Qinglai Xiao
2014-11-05 14:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-05 15:11 ` jigsaw [this message]
2014-11-05 16:36 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-05 17:24 ` jigsaw
2014-11-06 9:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-06 10:14 ` jigsaw
2014-11-06 10:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-06 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: [PATCH] Add user defined tag calculation callback tolibrte_distributor Qinglai Xiao
2014-11-06 13:59 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-06 18:01 ` jigsaw
2014-11-06 19:52 ` jigsaw
2014-11-07 9:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-07 12:38 ` jigsaw
2014-11-07 13:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-07 14:31 ` jigsaw
[not found] ` <20141107144410.GC12092@bricha3-MOBL3>
2014-11-07 14:52 ` jigsaw
2014-11-07 15:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2014-11-07 15:18 ` jigsaw
2014-11-06 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] distributor: add comments to make code more readable Bruce Richardson
2014-11-07 14:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-07 14:31 ` jigsaw
2014-11-06 13:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add user defined tag calculation callback to librte_distributor Bruce Richardson
2014-11-05 15:13 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-05 15:24 ` jigsaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHVfvh4yAdF-aDnV+sh+PgJpEUW18+aF0=JoZDwJtGHhh=5ZzQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jigsaw@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).