DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: do not return defer queue handle to the user
@ 2020-07-11  7:41 Ruifeng Wang
  2020-07-11 13:37 ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ruifeng Wang @ 2020-07-11  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson, Vladimir Medvedkin
  Cc: dev, david.marchand, nd, honnappa.nagarahalli, Ruifeng Wang

There is no need to return defer queue handle in rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add API,
since enough flexibility has been provided to configure the defer queue.

Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
---
This is a followup patch of LPM RCU reclamation series [1].
[1] http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/73673/

 app/test/test_lpm.c      | 10 +++++-----
 app/test/test_lpm_perf.c |  4 ++--
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c |  5 +----
 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h |  5 +----
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm.c b/app/test/test_lpm.c
index 8330501f0..258b2f67c 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm.c
@@ -1308,12 +1308,12 @@ test19(void)
 	rcu_cfg.v = qsv;
 	/* Invalid QSBR mode */
 	rcu_cfg.mode = 2;
-	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg);
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
 
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;
 	/* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
-	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg);
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
 
 	/* Create and attach another RCU QSBR to LPM table */
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ test19(void)
 
 	rcu_cfg.v = qsv2;
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
-	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg);
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status != 0);
 
 	rte_lpm_free(lpm);
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ test20(void)
 	rcu_cfg.v = qsv;
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ;
 	/* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
-	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg);
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
 
 	ip = RTE_IPV4(192, 0, 2, 100);
@@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ test21(void)
 	rcu_cfg.v = g_v;
 	rcu_cfg.mode = RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC;
 	/* Attach RCU QSBR to LPM table */
-	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(g_lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL);
+	status = rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(g_lpm, &rcu_cfg);
 	TEST_LPM_ASSERT(status == 0);
 
 	writer_done = 0;
diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
index dfe186426..58076795e 100644
--- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
 
 	rcu_cfg.v = rv;
 	/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
-	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL) != 0) {
+	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg) != 0) {
 		printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
 		goto error;
 	}
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
 
 	rcu_cfg.v = rv;
 	/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */
-	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg, NULL) != 0) {
+	if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm, &rcu_cfg) != 0) {
 		printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
 		goto error;
 	}
diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
index 126fc5a82..2db9e16a2 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
@@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ __lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource(void *p, void *data, unsigned int n)
 /* Associate QSBR variable with an LPM object.
  */
 int
-rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
-	struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq)
+rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg)
 {
 	struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_parameters params = {0};
 	char rcu_dq_name[RTE_RCU_QSBR_DQ_NAMESIZE];
@@ -329,8 +328,6 @@ rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
 			RTE_LOG(ERR, LPM, "LPM defer queue creation failed\n");
 			return 1;
 		}
-		if (dq != NULL)
-			*dq = internal_lpm->dq;
 	} else {
 		rte_errno = EINVAL;
 		return 1;
diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
index a9568fcdd..03da2d37e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
@@ -218,8 +218,6 @@ rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm);
  *   the lpm object to add RCU QSBR
  * @param cfg
  *   RCU QSBR configuration
- * @param dq
- *   handler of created RCU QSBR defer queue
  * @return
  *   On success - 0
  *   On error - 1 with error code set in rte_errno.
@@ -229,8 +227,7 @@ rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm);
  *   - ENOMEM - memory allocation failure
  */
 __rte_experimental
-int rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
-	struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq);
+int rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg);
 
 /**
  * Add a rule to the LPM table.
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: do not return defer queue handle to the user
  2020-07-11  7:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: do not return defer queue handle to the user Ruifeng Wang
@ 2020-07-11 13:37 ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-07-11 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ruifeng Wang
  Cc: Bruce Richardson, Vladimir Medvedkin, dev, nd, Honnappa Nagarahalli

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 9:42 AM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> There is no need to return defer queue handle in rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add API,
> since enough flexibility has been provided to configure the defer queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
> This is a followup patch of LPM RCU reclamation series [1].
> [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/73673/

Applied, thanks Ruifeng.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-11 13:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-11  7:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lpm: do not return defer queue handle to the user Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-11 13:37 ` David Marchand

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).