DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>,
	"Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	 Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	dingxiaoxiong@huawei.com,
	Renata Saiakhova <Renata.Saiakhova@ekinops.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] delete HW rings when releasing queues for some drivers
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:25:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xLF7yXvt-0GOVLdjgEOk_tUC-RhN0jPbUQfAdBUW=25A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1631953295.git.wangyunjian@huawei.com>

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:34 AM Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> This series for deleting HW rings when releasing queues for
> igb, ixgbe, i40e, ice & em drivers.
>
> ---
> v2:
>    * Update commit log
>
> Yunjian Wang (4):
>   net/e1000: delete HW rings when releasing queues
>   net/ice: delete HW rings when releasing queues
>   net/i40e: delete HW rings when releasing queues
>   net/ixgbe: delete HW rings when releasing queues
>
>  drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c    | 8 ++++++--
>  drivers/net/e1000/igb_rxtx.c   | 9 +++++++--
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c   | 3 ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c   | 8 ++++++--
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h   | 2 ++
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c     | 6 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.h     | 2 ++
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 6 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 2 ++
>  9 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>

- In net/ice (at least), the fdir rxq/txq memzones can be aligned on
the same scheme.
Looking at the remaining drivers (net/cnxk, net/cxgbe and
net/octeontx2), we could apply the same principle of keeping a
reference to mz in internal driver structures.
Afterwards, I see no need to keep rte_eth_dma_zone_free() (it's
internal, so we can remove and it's easy to re-add if a need arises).

Wdyt?


- Is this worth backporting to stable branches?


-- 
David Marchand


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 11:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] delete HW rings when releasing queues Yunjian Wang
2021-09-17 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/e1000: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-17 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/ice: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-17 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/i40e: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-17 11:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-17 15:46   ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-18  3:10     ` wangyunjian
2021-09-18  3:19       ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-18  8:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] delete HW rings when releasing queues for some drivers Yunjian Wang
2021-09-18  8:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/e1000: delete HW rings when releasing queues Yunjian Wang
2021-09-18  8:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/ice: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-18  8:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/i40e: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-18  8:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22  6:22     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22  6:58       ` wangyunjian
2021-09-22  7:04         ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22 11:13           ` wangyunjian
2021-09-22 11:43             ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-20  7:25   ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-09-21  9:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] delete HW rings when releasing queues for some drivers Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22 13:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fixes for intel drivers Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22 13:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/e1000: fix memzone leak when re-configure the RX/TX queues Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22 13:51     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22 13:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ice: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22 13:51     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22 13:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/i40e: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22 13:51     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-09-22 13:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Yunjian Wang
2021-09-22 13:51     ` Wang, Haiyue
2021-10-07 11:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fixes for intel drivers Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xLF7yXvt-0GOVLdjgEOk_tUC-RhN0jPbUQfAdBUW=25A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=Renata.Saiakhova@ekinops.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dingxiaoxiong@huawei.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=haiyue.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=wangyunjian@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).