From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.02 v2] mem: don't warn about base addr if not requested
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:29:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8ySCZH6F1nbLC3k+QA2kyFMnB3LnekUvH4QLpbb580RBQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f49e252a7be2d8561f4b32193e5800f98c40b0e.1604936860.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:48 PM Anatoly Burakov
<anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Any EAL memory allocation often goes through eal_get_virtual_area()
> function, which will print a warning whenever the resulting allocation
> didn't match the specified address requirements. This is useful for
> when we have requested a specific base virtual address, to let the user
> know that the mapping has deviated from that address.
>
> However, on Linux, we also have a default base address that's there to
> ensure better chances of successful secondary process initialization,
> as well as higher likelihood of the virtual areas to fit inside the
> IOMMU address width. Because of this default base address, there are
> warnings printed even when no base address was explicitly requested,
> which can be confusing to the user.
>
> Emit this warning with debug level unless base address was explicitly
> requested by the user.
>
> Cc: Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Fix the condition to not update the address incorrectly
> - Instead of removing the warning, let it have debug level unless base address
> was explicitly specified by the user
>
> I'm not entirely sure the trade off between user confusion and helpful debug
> information is worth it, but in my experience, i've stopped getting any emails
> about secondary processes a long time ago and this isn't a widely used feature,
> so i believe this is worth it.
>
> lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> index 33917fa835..1b50c2099d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c
> @@ -140,9 +140,19 @@ eal_get_virtual_area(void *requested_addr, size_t *size,
> return NULL;
> } else if (requested_addr != NULL && addr_is_hint &&
> aligned_addr != requested_addr) {
> - RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "WARNING! Base virtual address hint (%p != %p) not respected!\n",
> - requested_addr, aligned_addr);
> - RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, " This may cause issues with mapping memory into secondary processes\n");
> + /*
> + * demote this warning to debug if we did not explicitly request
> + * a base virtual address.
> + */
> + if (internal_conf->base_virtaddr != 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "WARNING! Base virtual address hint (%p != %p) not respected!\n",
> + requested_addr, aligned_addr);
> + RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, " This may cause issues with mapping memory into secondary processes\n");
> + } else {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "WARNING! Base virtual address hint (%p != %p) not respected!\n",
> + requested_addr, aligned_addr);
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, " This may cause issues with mapping memory into secondary processes\n");
> + }
> } else if (next_baseaddr != NULL) {
> next_baseaddr = RTE_PTR_ADD(aligned_addr, *size);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
EAL options like --in-memory or --no-shconf makes MP unusable.
If we add a rte_mp_disable() for them, we could check here for MP
status here and display nothing at all.
WDYT?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 15:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.02] " Anatoly Burakov
2020-11-09 15:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.02 v2] " Anatoly Burakov
2021-01-12 10:29 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-01-22 17:21 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-01-28 11:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8ySCZH6F1nbLC3k+QA2kyFMnB3LnekUvH4QLpbb580RBQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=damarion@cisco.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).