From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] devtools: avoid installing static binaries
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:37:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yWe0WzLE6febVPe--Dir303=o_qxzcV6k0KQg=pWSCvw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207173319.1397740-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 6:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> When testing compilation and checking ABI compatibility,
> there is no real need of static binaries eating disks.
> The static linkage of applications are tested with GCC and Clang,
> plus some examples are statically linked.
> The after-installation build test is limited to "helloworld" example.
> Note the meson static build test was already limited to "l3fwd" example.
>
> The ABI compatibility is checked on shared libraries, so no need
> running this test a second time on builds intended for static linking.
> However, limiting ABI check to "shared builds" means all test cases
> must have a "shared build" occurence.
> As a consequence the 32-bit build test is switched to shared linking.
I see no reason to tie the ABI check to default-library.
What about the mingw target?
What you want is to avoid doing duplicate ABI checks.
This happens for the gcc/clang x86 builds, so I'd rather control the
ABI checks out of the build() function (passing a new parameter?).
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 17:33 Thomas Monjalon
2020-12-07 17:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-12-07 18:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-12-08 9:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-12-08 15:37 ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-12-08 15:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-13 19:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-13 22:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-15 15:24 ` David Marchand
2021-01-15 16:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8yWe0WzLE6febVPe--Dir303=o_qxzcV6k0KQg=pWSCvw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).