From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:19:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zFXEtBBbcVLU2Y6GY_ZX8_V7-OcJHqoW2cZB6F=iDttw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY8PR11MB7136F6E5A127B6825472E4B2E5FCA@CY8PR11MB7136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:09 PM Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com> wrote:
> > > In EAL related test cases, the allow parameters are not passed to the
> > > secondary process, resulting in unexpected NICs being loaded.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes this issue by appending the allow parameters to the
> > > secondary process.
> >
> > This patch looks wrong.
> >
> > Can you provide a description of the issue?
>
> CI/Checkpatch a warning has appeared. Marked as Superseded.
> The new patch will replace it.
Rather than a new patch because of some compilation issue on the
implementation, please explain what you are trying to fix.
It may avoid wasting time.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-25 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 9:35 [PATCH] child process synchronization NIC startup parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-06 2:16 ` Yang, Qiming
2023-07-07 1:21 ` You, KaisenX
2023-07-06 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-14 5:59 ` [PATCH v2] app/test:subprocess synchronization of parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-17 1:47 ` Kaisen You
2023-07-26 2:39 ` Kaisen You
2023-09-25 9:42 ` [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-09-25 9:58 ` David Marchand
2023-09-25 10:09 ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-09-25 10:19 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-09-27 3:42 ` [PATCH v4] app/test: append 'allow' parameters to secondary processes Mingjin Ye
2023-10-13 2:47 ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-09 11:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-10 10:30 ` [PATCH v5] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-11-10 11:18 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-13 10:42 ` [PATCH v6] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-13 11:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-14 10:28 ` [PATCH v7] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-17 10:05 ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-17 10:24 ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-11-17 11:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-24 10:28 ` Ye, MingjinX
2024-03-06 13:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-10-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v2] app/test:subprocess synchronization of parameters Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH] child process synchronization NIC startup parameters Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zFXEtBBbcVLU2Y6GY_ZX8_V7-OcJHqoW2cZB6F=iDttw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).