DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andriy Berestovskyy <aber@semihalf.com>
To: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: ierrors counter spuriously increasing in DPDK 2.1
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:53:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOysbxporsT==wR5DxO7gAima77Xe9+FWnfa4ys0DFabOV5+Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56274EFE.5040706@allegro-packets.com>

Yes Marcin,
The issue was discussed here:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023229.html

You can either fix the ierrors in ixgbe_dev_stats_get() or implement a
workaround in your app getting the extended statistics and counting
out some of extended counters from the ierrors.

Here is an example:
https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-vrouter/commit/72f6ca05ac81d0ca5e7eb93c6ffe7a93648c2b00#diff-99c1f65a00658c7d38b3d1b64cb5fd93R1306

Regards,
Andriy

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Martin Weiser
<martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with DPDK 2.1 we are seeing the ierrors counter increasing for 82599ES
> ports without reason. Even directly after starting test-pmd the error
> counter immediately is 1 without even a single packet being sent to the
> device:
>
> ./testpmd -c 0xfe -n 4 -- --portmask 0x3 --interactive
> ...
> testpmd> show port stats all
>
>   ######################## NIC statistics for port 0  ########################
>   RX-packets: 0          RX-missed: 0          RX-bytes:  0
>   RX-badcrc:  0          RX-badlen: 0          RX-errors: 1
>   RX-nombuf:  0
>   TX-packets: 0          TX-errors: 0          TX-bytes:  0
>   ############################################################################
>
>   ######################## NIC statistics for port 1  ########################
>   RX-packets: 0          RX-missed: 0          RX-bytes:  0
>   RX-badcrc:  0          RX-badlen: 0          RX-errors: 1
>   RX-nombuf:  0
>   TX-packets: 0          TX-errors: 0          TX-bytes:  0
>   ############################################################################
>
>
> When packet forwarding is started the ports perform normally and
> properly forward all packets but a huge number of ierrors is counted:
>
> testpmd> start
> ...
> testpmd> show port stats all
>
>   ######################## NIC statistics for port 0  ########################
>   RX-packets: 9011857    RX-missed: 0          RX-bytes:  5020932992
>   RX-badcrc:  0          RX-badlen: 0          RX-errors: 9011753
>   RX-nombuf:  0
>   TX-packets: 9026250    TX-errors: 0          TX-bytes:  2922375542
>   ############################################################################
>
>   ######################## NIC statistics for port 1  ########################
>   RX-packets: 9026250    RX-missed: 0          RX-bytes:  2922375542
>   RX-badcrc:  0          RX-badlen: 0          RX-errors: 9026138
>   RX-nombuf:  0
>   TX-packets: 9011857    TX-errors: 0          TX-bytes:  5020932992
>   ############################################################################
>
>
> When running the exact same test with DPDK version 2.0 no ierrors are
> reported.
> Is anyone else seeing strange ierrors being reported for Intel Niantic
> cards with DPDK 2.1?
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>



-- 
Andriy Berestovskyy

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-21  8:38 Martin Weiser
2015-10-21 15:53 ` Andriy Berestovskyy [this message]
2015-10-22  7:46   ` Martin Weiser
2015-10-22 10:56     ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2015-11-02 17:32 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2015-11-04  9:10   ` Martin Weiser
2015-11-04 15:50     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: remove l3_l4_xsum_errors from rx errors Harry van Haaren
2015-11-04 16:08       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-04 15:54     ` [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: ierrors counter spuriously increasing in DPDK 2.1 Van Haaren, Harry
2015-11-04 16:29       ` Martin Weiser
2015-11-04 16:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: remove l3_l4_xsum_errors from rx errors Harry van Haaren
2015-11-04 16:57       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOysbxporsT==wR5DxO7gAima77Xe9+FWnfa4ys0DFabOV5+Xw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aber@semihalf.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).