From: Don Provan <dprovan@bivio.net>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] removing mbuf error flags
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:16:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY1PR0101MB09876E56089113A751EDD381A0660@CY1PR0101MB0987.prod.exchangelabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572352A3.6030400@6wind.com>
>From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] removing mbuf error flags
>
>My opinion is that invalid packets should not be given to the application and only a statistic counter should be incremented.
The idea of an application that handles bad packets is perfectly valid. Most applications don't want to see them, of course, but, conceptually, some applications would want to ask for bad packets because they are specifically designed to handle various networking problems including those that result in bad packets that the application can look at and report. Furthermore, it makes technical sense for DPDK to support such applications.
Having said that, I have no idea if that's why that field was added, and I don’t myself care if DPDK provides that feature in the future. I just thought I'd put the idea out there in case it makes any difference to you. If it were me, I'd probably decide it isn't hurting anything and not bother to remove it in case some day someone wants to implement that feature in one driver or another.
-don provan
dprovan@bivio.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 12:25 Olivier Matz
2016-04-29 17:47 ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-04-29 18:16 ` Don Provan [this message]
2016-04-29 18:24 ` Jay Rolette
2016-04-29 20:00 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2016-04-29 20:57 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-04-30 1:41 ` Don Provan
2016-05-10 8:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] mbuf: remove unused rx " Olivier Matz
2016-05-12 1:32 ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-05-12 9:25 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-05-23 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused Rx " Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 11:39 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 12:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 14:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 12:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 12:49 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 13:25 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 13:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY1PR0101MB09876E56089113A751EDD381A0660@CY1PR0101MB0987.prod.exchangelabs.com \
--to=dprovan@bivio.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).