DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Mike Ximing" <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>
To: "Power, Ciara" <ciara.power@intel.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>,
	"Vedantham, Sundar" <sundar.vedantham@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eventdev: support telemetry with xstats info
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:18:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4431EC2466750E9C440A5C03D93E0@MN2PR11MB4431.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB255535CBE425C7CD161B9AC6E63E0@DM6PR11MB2555.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ciara,

Thanks for identifying the issue. For some reasons, the problem did not show up in my previous tests with telemetry and eventdev.  I will fix the bug as we discussed and upload a v2 patch.

Best Regards,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Power, Ciara <ciara.power@intel.com> 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:05 AM
To: Chen, Mike Ximing <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>; Vedantham, Sundar <sundar.vedantham@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] eventdev: support telemetry with xstats info

Hi Mike,

See comment inline.

Asides from that comment, overall the change looks good from a Telemetry usage point of view, in my opinion.

Thanks,
Ciara


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chen, Mike Ximing <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>
>Sent: Wednesday 9 September 2020 21:55
>To: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Eads, Gage <gage.eads@intel.com>; Vedantham, Sundar 
><sundar.vedantham@intel.com>; Power, Ciara <ciara.power@intel.com>; 
>Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Chen, Mike Ximing 
><mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>
>Subject: [PATCH] eventdev: support telemetry with xstats info
>
>The telemetry library is connected with eventdev xstats and port link 
>info. The following new telemetry commands are added:
>
>/eventdev/dev_list
>/eventdev/port_list,DevID
>/eventdev/queue_list,DevID
>/eventdev/dev_xstats,DevID
>/eventdev/port_xstats,DevID,PortID
>/eventdev/queue_xstats,DevID,PortID
>/eventdev/queue_links,DevID,PortID
>
>queue_links command displays a list of queues linked with a specified 
>eventdev port and a service priority associated with each link.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mike Ximing Chen <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>
>---
>Depends-on: patch-76075 ("lib/telemetry: fix passing full params string 
>to
>command")
>---
> lib/librte_eventdev/meson.build    |   1 +
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 304 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 305 insertions(+)

<snip>

>+
>+static int
>+handle_queue_links(const char *cmd __rte_unused,
>+		   const char *params,
>+		   struct rte_tel_data *d)
>+{
>+	int i, ret, port_id = 0;
>+	char *end_param;
>+	uint8_t dev_id;
>+	uint8_t queues[RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV];
>+	uint8_t priorities[RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV];
>+	const char *p_param;
>+
>+	if (params == NULL || strlen(params) == 0 || !isdigit(*params))
>+		return -1;
>+
>+	/* Get dev ID from parameter string */
>+	dev_id = strtoul(params, &end_param, 10);
>+	RTE_EVENTDEV_VALID_DEVID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, -EINVAL);
>+
>+	p_param = strtok(end_param, ",");
>+	if (p_param == NULL || strlen(p_param) == 0 || !isdigit(*p_param))
>+		return -1;
>+
>+	port_id = strtoul(p_param, &end_param, 10);
>+	p_param = strtok(NULL, "\0");
>+	if (*p_param != '\0')
>+		RTE_EDEV_LOG_DEBUG(
>+			"Extra parameters passed to eventdev telemetry
>command, ignoring");


The code above to parse the parameters doesn't look right to me - I think in the case of valid parameters being passed (e.g. "0,2"), there would be a seg fault at this condition check on p_param. 
This applies to the other handler functions here that follow similar steps also.


>+
>+	ret = rte_event_port_links_get(dev_id, port_id, queues, priorities);
>+	if (ret < 0)
>+		return -1;
>+
>+	rte_tel_data_start_dict(d);
>+	for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
>+		char qid_name[32];
>+
>+		snprintf(qid_name, 31, "qid_%u", queues[i]);
>+		rte_tel_data_add_dict_u64(d, qid_name, priorities[i]);
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}

<snip>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-17 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-09 20:54 Chen, Mike Ximing
2020-09-17  9:04 ` Power, Ciara
2020-09-17 14:18   ` Chen, Mike Ximing [this message]
2020-09-18 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Mike Ximing Chen
2020-09-21 10:16   ` Power, Ciara
2020-09-22 19:04   ` Eads, Gage
2020-10-04  9:32     ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB4431EC2466750E9C440A5C03D93E0@MN2PR11MB4431.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mike.ximing.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=sundar.vedantham@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).