DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Xu, HailinX" <hailinx.xu@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:28:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN7PR11MB7139B94FAE9744676399844CE5B8A@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZVdLsCu17W7cYcA+@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi, 

Thanks for the ack. would like to change the state of the patch, which will be merged into the dpdk.

Change: The "--allow" parameter is added when the number of allow is greater than zero.

Thanks,
Mingjin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 7:17 PM
> To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org; Xu, HailinX <hailinx.xu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] app/test: secondary process passes allow
> parameters
> 
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:24:41AM +0000, Ye, MingjinX wrote:
> > Hi Richardson,
> >
> > can you please take a look at this patch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mingjin
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I acked v6. If nothing major has changed in the patch, then the ack can be
> kept for v7. If there is something that has changed that you think I should
> look at, please include it in the change-log, so I can check it out.
> 
> For now, assuming no major changes:
> 
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> /Bruce
> 
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 6:28 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Ye, MingjinX
> > > <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH v7] app/test: secondary process passes allow
> > > parameters
> > >
> > > In EAL related test cases, the allow parameters are not passed to
> > > the secondary process, resulting in unexpected NICs being loaded.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes this issue by appending the allow parameters to the
> > > secondary process.
> > >
> > > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v5: Optimized.
> > > ---
> > > v6: Optimized.
> > > ---
> > > v7: Fix CI errors.
> > > ---
> > >  app/test/process.h | 46
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test/process.h b/app/test/process.h index
> > > af7bc3e0de..06b2f8b192 100644
> > > --- a/app/test/process.h
> > > +++ b/app/test/process.h
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > >  #include <dirent.h>
> > >
> > >  #include <rte_string_fns.h> /* strlcpy */
> > > +#include <rte_devargs.h>
> > >
> > >  #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_FREEBSD
> > >  #define self "curproc"
> > > @@ -34,6 +35,34 @@ extern uint16_t flag_for_send_pkts;  #endif
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +#define PREFIX_ALLOW "--allow="
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +add_parameter_allow(char **argv, int max_capacity) {
> > > +	struct rte_devargs *devargs;
> > > +	int count = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	RTE_EAL_DEVARGS_FOREACH(NULL, devargs) {
> > > +		if (strlen(devargs->name) == 0)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		if (devargs->data == NULL || strlen(devargs->data) == 0) {
> > > +			if (asprintf(&argv[count], PREFIX_ALLOW"%s",
> > > devargs->name) < 0)
> > > +				break;
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			if (asprintf(&argv[count], PREFIX_ALLOW"%s,%s",
> > > +					 devargs->name, devargs->data) < 0)
> > > +				break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		if (++count == max_capacity)
> > > +			break;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return count;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * launches a second copy of the test process using the given argv
> > > parameters,
> > >   * which should include argv[0] as the process name. To identify in
> > > the @@ -
> > > 43,8 +72,10 @@ extern uint16_t flag_for_send_pkts;  static inline
> > > int process_dup(const char *const argv[], int numargs, const char
> *env_value)  {
> > > -	int num;
> > > -	char *argv_cpy[numargs + 1];
> > > +	int num = 0;
> > > +	char **argv_cpy;
> > > +	int allow_num;
> > > +	int argv_num;
> > >  	int i, status;
> > >  	char path[32];
> > >  #ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> > > @@ -58,11 +89,18 @@ process_dup(const char *const argv[], int
> > > numargs, const char *env_value)
> > >  	if (pid < 0)
> > >  		return -1;
> > >  	else if (pid == 0) {
> > > +		allow_num =
> > > rte_devargs_type_count(RTE_DEVTYPE_ALLOWED);
> > > +		argv_num = numargs + allow_num + 1;
> > > +		argv_cpy = calloc(argv_num, sizeof(char *));
> > > +		if (!argv_cpy)
> > > +			rte_panic("Memory allocation failed\n");
> > > +
> > >  		/* make a copy of the arguments to be passed to exec */
> > >  		for (i = 0; i < numargs; i++)
> > >  			argv_cpy[i] = strdup(argv[i]);
> > > -		argv_cpy[i] = NULL;
> > > -		num = numargs;
> > > +		if (allow_num > 0)
> > > +			num = add_parameter_allow(&argv_cpy[i],
> > > allow_num);
> > > +		num += numargs;
> > >
> > >  #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUX
> > >  		{
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-24 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-05  9:35 [PATCH] child process synchronization NIC startup parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-06  2:16 ` Yang, Qiming
2023-07-07  1:21   ` You, KaisenX
2023-07-06 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-14  5:59 ` [PATCH v2] app/test:subprocess synchronization of parameters Kaisen You
2023-07-17  1:47 ` Kaisen You
2023-07-26  2:39 ` Kaisen You
2023-09-25  9:42   ` [PATCH v3] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-09-25  9:58     ` David Marchand
2023-09-25 10:09       ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-09-25 10:19         ` David Marchand
2023-09-27  3:42     ` [PATCH v4] app/test: append 'allow' parameters to secondary processes Mingjin Ye
2023-10-13  2:47       ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-09 11:13       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-10 10:30       ` [PATCH v5] app/test: secondary process passes allow parameters Mingjin Ye
2023-11-10 11:18         ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-13 10:42         ` [PATCH v6] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-13 11:11           ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-14 10:28           ` [PATCH v7] " Mingjin Ye
2023-11-17 10:05             ` Huang, ZhiminX
2023-11-17 10:24             ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-11-17 11:17               ` Bruce Richardson
2023-11-24 10:28                 ` Ye, MingjinX [this message]
2024-03-06 13:50             ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-10-03 16:00   ` [PATCH v2] app/test:subprocess synchronization of parameters Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH] child process synchronization NIC startup parameters Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN7PR11MB7139B94FAE9744676399844CE5B8A@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hailinx.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).